Kids and the COVID-19 vaccine: Five questions from parents answered by pediatricians

Kids and the COVID-19 vaccine: Five questions from parents answered by pediatricians
Kids and the COVID-19 vaccine: Five questions from parents answered by pediatricians
VioletaStoimenova/iStock

(NEW YORK) — Children 5 to 11 may be able to start getting vaccines as early as Wednesday, marking a major milestone in the ongoing fight against COVID-19 in the United States.

An advisory panel with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is scheduled to meet Nov. 2 and vote on whether to recommend the Pfizer vaccine for the approximately 28 million U.S. children aged 5 to 11.

It will then be up to CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky to make the final decision, one she’s expected to make quickly.

That potentially quick turnaround has left many parents scrambling to answer vaccine-related questions about how it could affect their kids.

The nation’s top health experts though have said that getting more kids vaccinated will be key to managing the pandemic in the U.S.

“If we can create a situation where more of these kids are not getting infected, we should be able to drive this pandemic down, which is what we really hope to do, even as we face the cold [weather] and other concerns about whether we might see another surge,” Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, said Tuesday on Good Morning America. “We don’t want that, and this would be one significant step forward in getting our country really in a better place.”

GMA spoke with leading pediatricians from across the country, and here are some of their answers to five questions about vaccines for children 5 to 11.

1. Why does a child need a COVID vaccine?

Getting kids vaccinated against COVID-19 helps protect them against serious illness, according to Dr. Mark Kline, physician-in-chief at Children’s Hospital New Orleans.

“The idea that children don’t get very sick from COVID was a myth,” he said. “The delta variant that hit us so hard over the summer really disabused us of that myth once and for all.”

Over 1 million children were diagnosed with COVID-19 in the past six weeks, adding to the total of more than 6 million children who have tested positive since start of the pandemic, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.

While it’s true kids often have more mild cases of COVID-19, they can still get “very sick” from the virus, according to Dr. Mobeen Rathore, division chief of pediatric infectious diseases at the University of Florida College of Medicine.

“Many children, as we saw this last surge, do get very sick,” he said. “They do get in the hospital, they do get into the ICU, and they can be on a breathing machine — and, unfortunately, they can die.”

More than 700 children and teens under 18 have died of COVID-19 in the U.S. since the start of the pandemic, according to the CDC.

2. How do we know a vaccine is safe for kids under 12?

Pfizer has conducted clinical trials with its COVID-19 vaccine on kids ages 5 to 11 since last year, and the company’s most recent data shows that it was nearly 91% effective against symptomatic illness.

The vaccine also appeared safe. None of the children in the clinical trials experienced a rare heart inflammation side effect known as myocarditis, which has been associated with the mRNA vaccines in very rare cases, mostly among young men.

“We learned a lot from the vaccination of 12-to-18-year-olds, especially about rare side effects like myocarditis,” said Dr. Andrew Nowalk, a clinical specialist in pediatric infectious diseases at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. “The vaccine trials that were done in the 5-to-11-year-olds looked at a range of doses, including the higher dose that we used in the adolescents and adults and then lower doses, and the lower dose was found to be very effective with fewer side effects and that’s what the vaccine is being based on.”

“I think this is a tribute to our dedication to vaccine safety throughout all of these trials,” he said.

3. Is the vaccine dose for kids different than for adults

For kids, the Pfizer vaccine will be smaller, one-third of the adolescent and adult dose.

Like adults and adolescents, kids ages 5 to 11 will be fully vaccinated after two shots. Their vaccine is proposed to be given in two 10-microgram doses administered 21 days apart.

The smaller doses will allow kids to develop a strong immunity while minimizing possible side effects, according to Dr. Alok Patel, a pediatric hospitalist at University of California, San Francisco.

“The thought there is, this will actually give those young robust immune systems enough information to tank up those antibody levels,” he said. “But also at a smaller dose, it’s going to reduce the chances of immune reactogenicity. It’s going to make it a safer vaccine.”

When it comes to dosing, differing immune systems among people of different ages help explain why the cutoffs for vaccine eligibility rest on age and not body size.

“You don’t need to worry that your 11-year-old is going to be under-dosed if they get the the smaller pediatric dose,” said Dr. Allison Bartlett, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at the University of Chicago Comer Children’s Hospital. “Conversely, we’ve had plenty of small 12 and 13 and 75-year-old people get the full adult dose and are doing just fine.”

In addition to the COVID-19 vaccine, other immunizations are also scheduled and administered based on age and not weight. This is partially due to the fact that the body’s immune responses to vaccinations and infection are known to be different based on age.

4. Will the vaccine affect kids’ development?

“There’s no evidence that this vaccine has any effect on the development,” said Rathore. “There’s also no biologically plausible reason that it would affect the development of your child, and the reason for that it is a protein that, once it does its job in the body, it goes away.”

There is also currently no clinical evidence to suggest any of the COVID-19 vaccines can have long-term effects on puberty or fertility.

Both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines use mRNA technology, which doesn’t enter the nucleus of the cells and doesn’t alter human DNA. Instead, it provides a genetic “instruction manual” that prompts cells to create proteins that look like the outside of the virus — a way for the body to learn and develop defenses against infection.

5. Why should I get my child vaccinated now?

The pediatricians GMA spoke with collectively agreed it is important for parents to get their child ages 5 to 11 vaccinated as soon as they are eligible in order to help protect their child’s health, and to help protect the health of others.

“I would say that the most important reason not to wait is kids are dying from COVID right now in the United States,” said Nowalk. “We’ve actually had more pediatric deaths in the last couple of months than at any other time during this epidemic.”

Kline, of Children’s Hospital New Orleans, said he hopes his grandchildren will be among the first in line for a vaccine once eligible.

“I don’t see any virtue in waiting and putting children further at risk for preventable illness or even death,” Kline added. “The advice that I’m giving to parents that I counsel in the clinic, and the advice that I have given to my own daughters about my grandchildren is, the moment those vaccines are available at the pharmacy or at the pediatricians office, they should avail themselves of the opportunity to get the vaccine.”

If parents have questions and concerns, they should talk with their health care provider, advised Dr. Robert Frenck, lead investigator of the pediatric COVID-19 vaccine trials at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.

“What every parent is trying to do is to protect their child and to make sure their child is healthy and happy,” said Frenck. “And while doing something new or different can be scary, we have a lot of information around the COVID-19 vaccines that we have a good safety profile.”

Parents should reach out to health care providers and ask questions to make sure they’re comfortable, Frenck added.

“I hope that you’ll find that the right decision is to vaccinate your children,” he said, “because this is really what we need to get things back to normal.”

Copyright © 2021, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Ed Sheeran sings about fatherhood, love and loss in emotionally vulnerable new album, ‘=’

Ed Sheeran sings about fatherhood, love and loss in emotionally vulnerable new album, ‘=’
Ed Sheeran sings about fatherhood, love and loss in emotionally vulnerable new album, ‘=’
Yui Mok – WPA Pool/Getty Images

= (equals,) Ed Sheeran‘s fourth studio album, has finally arrived!

The English singer-songwriter released the 14-track album at the stroke of midnight on Friday, after over two months of teasing. 

In classic Sheeran form, the studio effort delivers the perfect mix of pop hits and ballads, providing an easy straight though listen for fans. And, that’s exactly what he wants people to do. 

While chatting with Apple Music, he said, “Please just listen to it once in order, that’s all I ask. I don’t care what you do after your first listen. Put songs on a playlist, put the album on shuffle—whatever you want. But you should listen the way it’s intended to be listened to at least once.”

As for the overall meaning of the album, the singer revealed, “The theme of the record is me turning 30, becoming a dad, losing a friend, trying to balance work and marriage.” 

The lyrics from “First Times” prove just that as Sheeran sings of different moments from his relationship with wife Cherry Seaborn, whom he shares daughter Lyra Antarctica.

“The greatest thing that I have achieved/ Is four little words down on one knee/ You said, ‘Darling are you joking?’/ And I just said, ‘Please,'” he sings. 

Again on “2Step,” he expresses his love for Seaborn singing in the chorus, “2 steppin with the woman I love/ All we need is us.”

= is the follow up to 2017’s ÷ (divide) and includes his previously released tracks “Shivers,” “Bad Habits,” and “Visiting Hours.”

The album is available to stream now.

Copyright © 2021, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Two adults charged with assaulting minors at youth football game in Maryland

Two adults charged with assaulting minors at youth football game in Maryland
Two adults charged with assaulting minors at youth football game in Maryland
fstop123/iStock

(MANCHESTER, Md.) — A recreational youth football game in Maryland that devolved into a brawl among at least 30 people has resulted in accusations of racism and charges against two white adults are accused of assaulting two Black minors from the opposing team.

The game between the Olney Bears, a team with predominantly Black and Hispanic children, and the North Carroll Colts, which predominantly was composed of white children, took place in Christmas Tree Park in Manchester, Maryland, on Sept. 25.

Police and North Carroll Rec Council officials say they have so far found no evidence that racism played a part in the scuffle.

Multiple parents who spoke with ABC News described a tense environment that was heightened because parents from both teams were on the same sideline.

Olney was winning when a heated disagreement over a referee’s call exacerbated tensions and referees called off the game early, according to police and multiple witnesses who added that the brawl broke out as coaches, parents and players walked off the field.

“[The game] disgustingly ended with approximately 30 persons in a melee, which is a very rare occurrence,” Manchester Police Chief John Hess told ABC News on Sunday. “The single officer on scene at the start was forced to use pepper spray to defuse the situation because his clear verbal commands were ignored, and the melee was escalating as he was waiting for multiple support units to arrive.”
NAACP calls on athletes not to sign with Texas teams over voting, abortion laws

Criminal charges and disciplinary action

According to court documents and police, Nicole Starr Ellis, 31 and Keith Gregory Lockner, 32, each were charged with second-degree assault against two 13-year-old Black players.

According to the District Court of Maryland for Carroll County, a trial is scheduled for Dec. 7. Joseph Ashley, an attorney representing Ellis, told ABC News on Wednesday that his client denies “all allegation of uttering racial epitaphs and of assaulting anyone.” Attorney Frank Turney, who’s representing Lockner, declined to comment to ABC News on Thursday.

According to court documents obtained by ABC News, a 13-year-old Olney player whose name was withheld to protect his identity, allegedly was punched by Lockner. Ellis is accused of assaulting KC Robinson, the son of Olney head coach Kirk Robinson.

The Carroll County Youth Football League to which both teams belong told ABC News that the executive board launched an investigation last month that’s so far led to the expulsion or suspension of several individuals associated with both teams.

“As additional details emerge the CCYFL will continue to evaluate and take further actions as necessary,” the executive board said in a statement to ABC News. “The League has a zero-tolerance policy for any physical altercations on its sidelines and unfortunately the decisions made by a few adults has impacted the season.”

The league would not disclose the names of those who faced disciplinary action, but Kirk Robinson confirmed that he was one of them.

According to Robinson, he initially was suspended for two games for using foul language during the game after he disagreed with a refereeing decision, but later he was banned for life from coaching in the league or attending games.

Robinson told ABC News he thinks that decision is unfair because he was defending his family.

“My job is to protect the kids that are on the field … and I’m paying the consequences for it,” he added. “You can’t tell me that any adult is going to be OK with — whether their child’s Black or white — being assaulted by another adult.”

Robinson’s wife, Amanda Robinson, told ABC News she witnessed the alleged assault against the first child.

LaTasha Robinson, KC Robinson’s mother, said that following confrontations involving Ellis, Lockner and parents of Olney players, there was pushing and shoving as they walked through the crowd. Amid the commotion, she said KC fell to the ground after he was allegedly assaulted by Ellis.

“He was upset, he was hurt,” LaTasha Robinson said. “You don’t just swing into a crowd and there’s kids there.”

Allegations of racism

Several individuals associated with the Olney team who were present at the game, including family members of the two 13-year-olds who were allegedly assaulted, claimed that their children were subjected to racial slurs by North Carroll players and parents.

Tamisha, the sister of the first child who was allegedly assaulted, told ABC News that her brother was crying so hard afterward that he “couldn’t even catch his breath.”

Tamisha said that her brother scored two touchdowns, and as tensions were getting high before the scuffle broke out, he and his teammates were being taunted throughout the game by individuals associated with North Carroll.

“I went over to him originally … and I just asked him if he was OK, and he said, ‘They’re calling me the N-word, they’re calling us the N-word, They’re taunting us.’ And I said, don’t worry about that, go to your coaches, just stay with them,” she said.

Hess told ABC News there is no evidence of racial slurs on various spectator videos obtained by police, but it’s unclear how much footage is out there and the criminal case is still open.

North Carroll Rec Council President Andy Kiler told ABC News on Sunday that the North Carroll Colts executive board took disciplinary action against several individuals, but “racist remarks have not been found, which includes an investigation by police that included video and conversations with those at the event.”

“NCRC takes all accusations of any type of discrimination very seriously, and we do not tolerate that type of behavior within our programs,” he added. “Our review has concluded unless new information is brought to our attention.”

Copyright © 2021, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Go-Go’s drummer Gina Schock happy the whole band will attend, perform at Rock Hall Induction Ceremony

Go-Go’s drummer Gina Schock happy the whole band will attend, perform at Rock Hall Induction Ceremony
Go-Go’s drummer Gina Schock happy the whole band will attend, perform at Rock Hall Induction Ceremony
Courtesy of Rock & Roll Hall of Fame

The Go-Go’s are among the artists being inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame on Saturday in Cleveland, and drummer Gina Schock says she’s excited that the whole band will be taking part in the ceremony.

Schock tells ABC Audio that at one point, singer Belinda Carlisle wasn’t sure if she was going to make the event because of a scheduling conflict, which really upset Gina.

“When I heard she might not be able to make it, I was like, ‘You’re f***ing kidding me!'” Schock recalls. “[T]hen I just thought, ‘I’m gonna let it go. It’s gonna work out the way it’s supposed to.’ Belinda was freaked out, you know. Called me up in tears…[But] it all worked out…[A]ll five of us are gonna be on that stage playing Go-Go’s songs.”

Schock says the band will be performing three songs at the ceremony.

Drew Barrymore will be inducting The Go-Go’s at the event, and while Gina notes that the actress wasn’t necessarily the band’s choice to do the honors, she’s happy about it.

“[I]t couldn’t be better, because [Drew] is a real fan, and has been forever,” Schock says.

Meanwhile, Gina shared how she felt about some of the other artists being inducted alongside her group.

“I’m a huge fan of the Foo Fighters…What can I say? I love them,” she declares. “And Tina Turner, she’s an icon…[And] I was a Todd Rundgren fan for years…[H]e’s iconic in the business as a producer, songwriter, musician.”

As previously reported, this year’s other inductees include Carole King and Jay-Z in the main Performers category; Kraftwerk, Charley Patton and Gil Scott-Heron for Early Influence; and Randy Rhoads, Billy Preston and LL Cool J for Musical Excellence.

Copyright © 2021, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Alice Cooper says he’s spending this Halloween recording a new studio album

Alice Cooper says he’s spending this Halloween recording a new studio album
Alice Cooper says he’s spending this Halloween recording a new studio album
Scott Legato/Getty Images

With Halloween taking place this Sunday, we checked in with shock rocker Alice Cooper to find out what his plans are for the scary, spooky holiday, and found out some exciting news.

Cooper, who wrapped up his 2021 U.S. tour in support of his latest studio album, Detroit Stories, last week, tells ABC Audio, “I would love to be home with my grandkids, taking ’em trick or treating, except I’m gonna be in the studio in Nashville recording the next album.”

The 73-year-old Rock & Roll Hall of Famer reveals he’s actually “already working on three different albums,” although he doesn’t share any specifics about the projects.

He adds, “I mean, to me, that’s what I was put on Earth to do, is to make records and entertain audiences, you know, and do my shows.”

Cooper says he has no plans to retire because he still feels he hasn’t come up with his best material, and he still loves performing for his fans.

Alice shares a story about how Bob Dylan responded when someone asked him when he was going to retire.

“[H]e goes, ‘I write songs, I sing songs for an audience. That’s what I do,'” Cooper says with a laugh. “It doesn’t matter how much money or anything like that…It has everything to do with, I haven’t written my best songs yet.”

Cooper adds, “Paul McCartney would tell you the same thing. He’d say, ‘I haven’t written my best songs yet, so I’m gonna go do another album.’ And as long as the audience is still there for me, I will keep going until they don’t show up anymore.”

Alice’s next scheduled performance will be in February 2022 on the Monsters of Rock Cruise, followed by a European tour kicking off in May.

Copyright © 2021, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Will Ferrell explains why he never made an ‘Elf’ sequel

Will Ferrell explains why he never made an ‘Elf’ sequel
Will Ferrell explains why he never made an ‘Elf’ sequel
Michael Loccisano/Getty Images

Elf is considered a holiday staple and fans have long wondered why the popular film doesn’t have a sequel.  Star Will Ferrell revealed in a new interview that he stopped it from being made.

Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, the actor opened up about his decision to table Elf 2, saying it had nothing to do with money.  In fact, he says he was offered a handsome $29 million to reprise the lovable Buddy the Elf.

According to the actor, he hints the only good thing about the potential sequel was the paycheck.

“I would have had to promote the movie from an honest place,” Ferrell reflected, “which would’ve been, like, ‘Oh no, it’s not good. I just couldn’t turn down that much money.'”

Noting of the script’s rehashed premise, he said he mulled over what his motivation would be for doing such a film and confessed, “I thought, ‘Can I actually say those words? I don’t think I can, so I guess I can’t do the movie.'”

Elf, also starring Zooey DeschanelEd Asner and James Caan, danced into theaters in October 2003 and Ferrell admits he once thought the now iconic Christmas film would be the death of his acting career.

There was a moment, he admits, when he was in New York City wearing Buddy’s fashionable yellow tights and thought to himself, “Boy, this could be the end.”

Then the movie charmed its test audience, with the actor gaining hope — especially after one test group of what appeared to be “USC frat boys” also enjoyed the feel-good film.

Elf proved to be a hit and a boon for Ferrell’s career, amassing $222.3 million during its box office run and, according to some critics, is considered one of the greatest Christmas films of all time.

Copyright © 2021, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Facing court deadline, Prince Andrew set to respond to sexual assault complaint

Facing court deadline, Prince Andrew set to respond to sexual assault complaint
Facing court deadline, Prince Andrew set to respond to sexual assault complaint
Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

(NEW YORK) — Britain’s Prince Andrew faces a deadline Friday to file a response to a sexual assault lawsuit filed against him in New York by an alleged victim of deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Virginia Giuffre, 38, claims she was directed by Epstein and his former associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, to have sex with the prince at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion and elsewhere in 2001, before she turned 18.

Prince Andrew and Maxwell have both denied Giuffre’s allegations.

According to a letter filed earlier this week by Andrew Brettler, a California-based attorney for the prince, the second son of Queen Elizabeth II, intends to file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

During a telephonic hearing in the case earlier this month, Brettler assailed Giuffre’s lawsuit as “baseless, non-viable and potentially unlawful.”

Among the royal’s arguments for dismissal is his claim that a settlement agreement Giuffre signed with Epstein in 2009 “releases [the prince] and others from any and all liability, including any purported liability arising from the claims Ms. Giuffre asserted against Prince Andrew here.”

But Giuffre’s attorneys contend that the prince’s attempt to rely on the previous settlement agreement with Epstein to forestall the case is destined to fail.

“There is no evidence from any of the parties to the release, or Prince Andrew, that the release was ever intended to include Prince Andrew, and we believe the evidence will be that it wasn’t,” wrote Giuffre’s lawyer, David Boies, in a court filing earlier this month.

The prince’s legal team recently received a copy of the 2009 settlement from Giuffre’s attorneys, but it will not be filed publicly this week. The deal’s contents have been placed under seal by another judge in a related lawsuit. Any references to the particulars of the agreement are expected to be redacted from the prince’s submissions to the court.

Giuffre’s lawsuit, filed on Aug. 9, seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages and accuses Andrew, 61, of sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

“Twenty years ago, Prince Andrew’s wealth, power, position, and connections enabled him to abuse a frightened, vulnerable child with no one there to protect her. It is long past the time for him to be held to account,” the lawsuit states.

Giuffre, now a 38-year-old mother living in Australia, first accused the prince of sexual abuse in public court filings in December 2014, in a case brought by alleged Epstein victims against the U.S. Department of Justice. That lawsuit challenged Epstein’s lenient deal with federal prosecutors in Florida in 2008.

Her claims were met then with vehement denials from Maxwell and from Buckingham Palace on behalf of the prince.

“It is emphatically denied that [Prince Andrew] had any form of sexual contact or relationship with [Giuffre]. The allegations made are false and without any foundation,” the palace said in a statement.

After Epstein’s death while awaiting trial on child sex-trafficking charges, the prince once again found himself under scrutiny for his prior association with the disgraced financier.

In a 2019 interview with the BBC, Andrew denied having sexual contact with Giuffre and claimed to have no recollection of ever meeting her.

“I’ve said consistently and frequently that we never had any sort of sexual contact whatever,” the prince said, responding to a question about allegations from Giuffre.

U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, who is overseeing Giuffre’s case, has scheduled the next hearing for Nov. 3.

Copyright © 2021, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Turning Back The Clock Is Good For Your Heart

Turning Back The Clock Is Good For Your Heart
Turning Back The Clock Is Good For Your Heart

Daylight Saving Time is ending! And turning back the clock is actually good for your heart! Typically, there are 20% more heart attacks on Mondays, according to the British Medical Journal. It’s a combination of a lack of sleep from the weekend, increased activity, rising blood pressure, and the stress of a starting a work week. But the switch back to Standard Time actually changes that dynamic.

In March, when we “spring forward” and move our clocks ahead one hour, there’s a 5% increase in heart attacks on Monday, and 10% on Tuesday. Researchers figure it’s because we’re already sleep-deprived – and the extra hour of lost sleep pushes those prone to a heart attack over the edge. However, in November when we “fall back” and move our clocks back an hour, there’s actually a 5% drop in heart attacks that week. Again, it’s because a lot of people take advantage of that extra hour and sleep longer. Or do something relaxing, like reading the morning paper until it’s time to get ready.

So, what’s the takeaway on this? It’s simple: Get more sleep! Dr. Lori Mosca, the director of preventive cardiology at New York Presbyterian Hospital, says getting the recommended seven to eight hours of sleep a night improves blood sugar, and reduces your blood pressure, blood clotting, cholesterol, and inflammation of your arteries. All of which reduce your risk for heart disease and heart attack. On the flip side, the disappearance of Daylight Saving Time can make you more tired. Why? Studies show that earlier sunsets, and long, dark evenings make fatigue worse, and can make you feel draggy all day.

The fix: Stop hitting the snooze button and get moving the moment your alarm goes off. Take advantage of the extra morning light by opening your blinds, or taking a walk outside. Sunlight suppresses the sleep hormone melatonin, and helps boost your energy and your mood.

How To Fight Off Seasonal Affective Disorder

How To Fight Off Seasonal Affective Disorder
How To Fight Off Seasonal Affective Disorder

We recently turned the clocks back an hour and even though sleep experts say that the time change is good news – because we typically get more rest – it can also trigger Seasonal Affective Disorder. And it can hit anyone, no matter how healthy you are. The disorder makes you feel tired, have less energy and feel hungrier – and your risk of depression jumps. So, here are a few ways to fight off Seasonal Affective Disorder:

  • Load up on light. The idea is to get your mind out of “it’s getting dark outside, time to sleep mode.” So, go outside during your lunch break to get your daylight fix! And as soon as you get home, turn on the lights so your brain doesn’t get lulled into “sleep zone.”

  • Go for a nighttime workout. Studies show that early evening exercise can help keep you energized during the evening. The key? Work out two hours before bed. That way, your brain has time to come off the dopamine exercise high so you’ll actually be able to fall asleep.

  • Don’t sleep late on weekends. Dr. Michael Terman, a psychologist and SAD specialist, says that oversleeping allows your body clock to drift later. And when you’re out of sync with local time, it can make you sluggish and depressed.

  • Use a light-therapy box. This mimics natural outdoor light. Dr. Terman believes that half the population would benefit from 30 minutes of light box therapy every morning. It’ll help increase your energy by mimicking natural sunlight, so a regular lamp won’t do the trick.

New York City firefighters protest vaccine mandate outside mayor’s residence as deadline nears

New York City firefighters protest vaccine mandate outside mayor’s residence as deadline nears
New York City firefighters protest vaccine mandate outside mayor’s residence as deadline nears
Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images

(NEW YORK) — New York City firefighters and other city workers protested outside the mayor’s residence Thursday, as a COVID-19 vaccination deadline quickly approaches.

Nearly all municipal employees, including police officers, sanitation workers and firefighters, have until 5 p.m. Friday to submit proof of receiving at least one dose of vaccine. Those who don’t get vaccinated will be placed on unpaid leave, starting Monday, for at least 30 days, and their future employment will be resolved in negotiations with individual labor unions. Uniformed correction officers have until Dec. 1 to show proof of vaccination.

The city’s firefighters’ unions organized Thursday’s anti-vaccine mandate rally, which filled the entire block in front of Gracie Mansion, home to Mayor Bill de Blasio. Municipal employees, including FDNY union members, and others gathered, some holding signs that said “My body my choice” and “Coercion is not consent.”

Uniformed Firefighters Association of Greater New York President Andrew Ansbro previously told reporters that “a lot” of the union’s members were “still struggling with making this decision.” James McCarthy, president of the Uniformed Fire Officers Association, has also argued that the deadline, announced on Oct. 20, is “not enough time to make a retirement decision if you are going to retire from this job.”

Ansbro has warned of a “catastrophic manpower shortage” if some 3,500 firefighters who are currently unvaccinated are unable to report to work. The FDNY said Wednesday that 65% of its members were vaccinated.

The mayor stood by his vaccine mandate Thursday, saying there are no plans to change the deadline.

“My job is to keep people safe, my employees, and 8.8 million people, and until we defeat COVID, people are not safe,” de Blasio said during a press briefing. “If we don’t stop COVID, New Yorkers will die. We must, must stop COVID and the way to do that is vaccination. And that must include our public employees.”

On potential shortages in the city’s fire, police and sanitation departments, de Blasio said that the agencies are “confident” about contingency plans, and that the city has anticipated that “a lot of the vaccinations would happen toward the end of the deadline.”

Overall, 86% of the city’s 300,000-plus workforce is vaccinated, de Blasio said. That includes school and hospital employees who faced earlier deadlines.

For outstanding city workers, that number drops to 76%, including 74% of police officers and 67% of sanitation workers, he said.

“We are very confident those numbers are going to go up a lot,” de Blasio said.

Legal challenges to pause the city’s vaccination mandate have so far been unsuccessful.

ABC News’ Aaron Katersky contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2021, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.