Swing-state Democrats keep their distance from President Biden

Swing-state Democrats keep their distance from President Biden
Swing-state Democrats keep their distance from President Biden
Marilyn Nieves/Getty Images

(NEW ALBANY, Ohio) — After voting for the bipartisan computer chip manufacturing bill earlier this year, Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio, was one of several lawmakers with President Joe Biden on Friday in Licking County, to mark the groundbreaking of Intel’s new semiconductor chip factory.

But as a Democratic candidate in a competitive Senate race, Ryan has kept his distance from Biden — who lost Ohio to former President Donald Trump by eight points in 2020.

The Ryan campaign has not asked Biden or anyone from the White House to campaign with the Senate hopeful, with “no plans to do so,” spokesperson Izzi Levy told ABC News.

Ryan is not alone: In many key states with crucial Senate, House and gubernatorial races, Democrats are carefully managing their association with the president, toeing the line between appearing too friendly with the White House, and breaking with him and a party who have consistently received low marks from voters on their handling of inflation and the economy.

Ryan went as far as to categorize himself as an “independent” during an interview with Youngstown’s WFMJ-TV on Thursday, ahead of the president’s arrival.

“Well, not really asking anybody. Like I just I’m not one of those guys like, ‘Oh, I need someone to come in and help me.’ I’ve been I’ve been doing this I know what I’m doing. I know what I believe in. I know where I’m from. I know who I’m fighting for. I don’t need anyone else to like, you know, gum that message up,” he said.

When pressed by ABC News on whether he’s renouncing his ties with the Democratic Party, Ryan backtracked, saying he’s campaigning as an “independent-minded person.”

“I’m running as an independent-minded person who’s taken on President Obama, who’s taken Nancy Pelosi, has taken on Bernie Sanders but also agreed with Trump on trade and China and General Mattis and other things,” Ryan said. “People want an independent-minded person, they don’t want someone who’s just going to pull the lever with their own party, and I will be capable of saying ‘no’ to my own party.”

During Thursday’s WFMJ interview, Ryan notably highlighted the policy platforms he’d agreed with former President Trump on while pointing out the times he’d delineated from Biden, with whom he has voted with 100% of the time, according to FiveThirtyEight.

“I agree with Biden on CHIPS and infrastructure and some of these things,” Ryan said. “I’ve agreed with, you know, Trump, for example, on China trade. I’ve agreed with Trump on renegotiating NAFTA, strong defense, space force, General Mattis, on those things.”

This isn’t the first time that Ryan has attempted to render a stark divide between himself and the president. When Biden announced his student loan forgiveness plan in August, Congressman Ryan distanced himself from the plan, saying it “sends the wrong message to the millions of Ohioans without a degree working just as hard to make ends meet.”

And when President Biden delivered a prime-time speech last Thursday denouncing “MAGA Republicans” and urging the country to unite against threats to American democracy, none of the Democratic Senate nominees that ABC News initially reached out to for responses reacted to the president’s speech, with Ryan later telling ABC News at an Ohio State University game that “we all have to be extremely vocal about people who stormed the Capitol.”

“I think we absolutely have to be very clear about speaking out about that,” the congressman told ABC News.

Ryan also joins a growing sect of national Democrats who have publicly declared their opposition to something Biden and his administration has confirmed he would do for months — run for a second White House term in 2024. He told WFMJ that “we need new leadership across the board” in response to a question on whether he believes Biden should declare another bid for the slot.

When pressed whether yes or no if he wants to see the president run again in 2024, Ryan told ABC News, “That’s not up to me” and reiterated the need for “generational change.”

“Guys like Mitch McConnell, these people have been there for a very long time,” he added. “As we move out of this age of stupidity that we’ve been in officially long. I think it’s time to hit the reset button and get people that don’t want to focus on us being Americans first.”

In Wisconsin over Labor Day weekend, as President Biden touted the power of union workers at a “Laborfest” in Milwaukee — Democratic Senate nominee and Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes was noticeably absent.

At a presser last week in Tempe, Arizona, Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly told ABC News that on the issue of whether he wanted the president to come join him in the state before the general election, he said, “We welcome anybody to come out. We’ve got a lot of issues we’re dealing with right now. Water, wildfires, being some of the top of my priority list.”

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat running for governor, did not join the president at his second Labor Day stop in Pittsburgh, after appearing with Biden at an official White House event in Wilkes-Barre the previous week.

Shapiro did tell CNN in May that he would “welcome” Biden in Pennsylvania to campaign for him, adding that he is “focused on running a race here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, listening to the people of Washington County, not Washington, D.C.”

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat in a competitive reelection race with Republican businessman Tim Michels, and Barnes marched in a “Laborfest” parade before the president’s arrival in the city, with supporters asking for pictures and opportunities to shake hands with Barnes, the candidate several voters told ABC News will be “the next senator of Wisconsin.”

In Georgia’s Senate race, Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock has also been on record distancing himself from President Biden as he fights for reelection, locked in a tight battle against former football star and GOP nominee Herschel Walker.

When pressed by ABC News at a campaign stop in Union City on Tuesday, Warnock wouldn’t say if he supports Biden coming to Georgia to campaign for him.

“Frankly, I’m not focused on who I’m campaigning with but who I’m campaigning for,” Warnock said. “That’s why I spend time in places like Union City. Before this stop, I was in Newnan — a place that folks don’t expect Democrats to show up — because I’m determined to represent all the people of Georgia.”

That campaign strategy marks a departure from just last year, when Biden campaigned in Georgia for Sens. Warnock and Jon Ossoff during their runoff elections.

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, calling it a ‘political manifesto’

Judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, calling it a ‘political manifesto’
Judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, calling it a ‘political manifesto’
Marilyn Nieves/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — A federal judge in Florida has dismissed former President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against his 2016 presidential challenger Hillary Clinton that accused her of “acting in concert” with top FBI leadership to invent what became known as the Russia investigation.

U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks seemingly mocked the lawsuit in his order of dismissal, calling the suit “difficult to summarize in a concise and cohesive manner.”

“It was certainly not presented that way,” the judge wrote.

Trump had argued that the Russia probe was “prolonged and exacerbated by the presence of a small faction of Clinton loyalists who were well-positioned within the Department of Justice,” a group that included defendants James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Kevin Clinesmith and Bruce Ohr.

The judge said the lawsuit was rife with “glaring problems,” claims that were “not warranted under existing law,” and legal theories that lacked factual support.

“At its core, the problem with Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is that Plaintiff is not attempting to seek redress for any legal harm; instead, he is seeking to flaunt a two-hundred-page political manifesto outlining his grievances against those that have opposed him, and this Court is not the appropriate forum,” the order said.

“We vehemently disagree with the opinion issued by the Court today,” Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, said in a statement following the dismissal. “Not only is it rife with erroneous applications of the law, it disregards the numerous independent governmental investigations which substantiate our claim that the defendants conspired to falsely implicate our client and undermine the 2016 Presidential election.”

Habba said Trump’s legal team would immediately move to appeal the decision.

Trump earlier tried to move the lawsuit to a different judge in the Southern District of Florida, but was unsuccessful. That judge, Aileen Cannon, is the same Trump-appointed judge who this week granted Trump’s motion for a special master to review the Justice Department’s seizure of documents from his Mar-a-Lago estate.

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe, completed in 2019, concluded that Russian interference in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systematic,” and the investigation led to seven guilty pleas and five jail sentences, mostly on charges of lying to investigators — but no charges were ever brought against Trump himself.

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Operations London Bridge, Unicorn, Spring Tide go into effect following Queen Elizabeth II’s death

Operations London Bridge, Unicorn, Spring Tide go into effect following Queen Elizabeth II’s death
Operations London Bridge, Unicorn, Spring Tide go into effect following Queen Elizabeth II’s death
Sylvain Sonnet/Getty Images

(LONDON) — Queen Elizabeth II’s death on Thursday came as a shock to the public.

Planning for what would happen in the days, weeks and months after her death, however, has been years in the making, and started around the time of her coronation 70 years ago.

Immediately upon the queen’s death at Balmoral Castle, a plan known internally among government and royal officials as Operation London Bridge went into effect, detailing the memorializing of the queen and the transition of power to her eldest son Prince Charles, now officially known as King Charles III.

An additional plan known as Operation Unicorn also went into effect Thursday, as the queen died at her castle in Scotland, as opposed to her residences in England.

Operation Unicorn details the process of transporting the queen’s coffin from Scotland to London, where her funeral will take place.

A plan known as Operation Spring Tide, meanwhile, lays out the details of Charles’ accession to the throne.

Here is what to expect with all three plans in effect, detailing — down to the minute — memorial services and the path ahead for the monarchy:

10 days of national mourning

A period of national mourning for Elizabeth began on the day of her death and will last until her funeral, which takes place 10 days after her death.

Described as a “period of time for reflection,” the mourning period will see public services and businesses operating as usual in the U.K., with the option to suspend or pause activities at their own discretion. Flags at royal residences, government buildings and military establishments will fly at half-mast during this time, according to the U.K. government.

Buckingham Palace has also declared a period of royal mourning, which is observed from now until seven days after the queen’s funeral.

During that time, flags will fly at half-mast — except for the Royal Standard — and royal residences will be closed, according to the palace.

Daily remembrances, formalities leading to a state funeral

Operation London Bridge designates the day of the queen’s death as “D-Day,” with each subsequent day known as D-Day+1, D-Day+2, all the way to the day of the queen’s funeral.

On Friday, the first day after the queen’s death, Charles and Camilla, the queen consort, arrived in England under their new titles for the first time, greeting well-wishers outside of Buckingham Palace.

A pre-recorded televised address from Charles, who assumed his title as king immediately upon his mother’s death, will be broadcast across the country at 6 p.m. local time Friday.

Other tributes for the queen on Friday include a national service of thanksgiving at St. Paul’s Cathedral, a gun salute across the U.K. and the tolling of bells across London and in Windsor, where the queen also resided.

On Saturday, the Accession Council — made up of senior government officials, judges and leaders of the Church of England — will meet at St. James’s Palace in London to formally proclaim Charles as king.

After the meeting, which Charles will attend, a proclamation will be read from the palace’s balcony. Later in the day, a second proclamation will be read at the Royal Exchange in London.

On Sunday, proclamations declaring Charles as king will be read in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales.

Over the course of the next week, the queen’s body will be transported to England and “ceremonial and commemorative events” will be held, the details of which have not yet been confirmed by Buckingham Palace.

There will be a public procession to carry the queen’s coffin from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Hall, where it will lie in state for around four days to allow the public to pay their last respects.

Members of the royal family will walk with the coffin in the procession, which will also include a military parade.

In addition to attending memorials for his mother in London, Charles is also expected to travel across the U.K. next week to meet with members of the public and local leaders.

The queen’s funeral is expected to take place at Westminster Abbey, making the queen the first sovereign to have a funeral there since 1760.

Westminster Abbey normally holds 2,200 congregants, but extra seating can be arranged to accommodate more than 8,000 people, as it did at the queen’s coronation.

Following the funeral, members of the royal family will attend the queen’s burial at St. George’s Chapel, on the grounds of Windsor Castle.

The queen will be buried next to her father King George VI, her sister Princess Margaret, and Prince Philip, her beloved late-husband of 73 years.

Charles’ coronation ceremony

Though he is already king, Charles’ coronation — the ceremony during which he is formally crowned — is likely to take place several months from now.

The queen’s coronation, for example, took place on June 2, 1953, 14 months after she ascended the throne upon her father’s death.

Charles is expected to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, where each coronation has taken place for the last 900 years, according to the royal family’s website.

The elaborate ceremony will be broadcast to the world and will see Charles take the coronation oath and have the St. Edward’s Crown placed on his head by the archbishop of Canterbury.

As queen consort, Camilla is expected to be crowned at the same time as her husband.

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Two Georgia sheriff’s deputies killed while serving warrant: Police

Two Georgia sheriff’s deputies killed while serving warrant: Police
Two Georgia sheriff’s deputies killed while serving warrant: Police
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

(COBB COUNTY, Ga.) — Two Cobb County sheriff’s deputies in Georgia have been killed while serving a warrant, officials said Thursday night.

Cobb County Sheriff Craig D. Owens said at a press conference late Thursday that the two were “ambushed” when they went to deliver the warrant.

“What I can tell you in this moment is this — in plain terms, it is simple, my two deputies were ambushed this evening and killed,” Owens said. “The two suspects we believe are the perpetrators of this crime are currently in custody and are being held at the Cobb County Police Department for questioning.”

The deputies were shot after exiting their vehicles, Owens said, with one person opening fire from inside the house and another from a nearby car.

The warrant was being served for failure to appear by theft of deception, the sheriff said.

Earlier in the evening, authorities had said a suspect was barricaded in the home where the warrant was being served. The suspects were taken into custody just after midnight, according to Atlanta ABC affiliate WSB-TV.

“Two @CobbSheriff deputies died tonight in the line of duty while serving a warrant,” the sheriff’s office tweeted. “SWAT and FAST teams are at the scene. The suspect is barricaded.”

“We will release additional information, including the names of the fallen deputies, as it becomes available,” the office added.

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

UK rail, postal workers cancel strikes after Queen’s death

UK rail, postal workers cancel strikes after Queen’s death
UK rail, postal workers cancel strikes after Queen’s death
Justin Tallis/AFP via Getty Images

(LONDON) — British rail and postal workers on Thursday canceled scheduled strikes after Queen Elizabeth II died earlier that day.

The moves pause worker protests that in recent months have involved hundreds of thousands of workers and at times disrupted train and mail services across England.

The Communication Workers Union, or CWU, which represents 115,000 workers at the Royal Mail, called off a 48-hour strike that began on Thursday and was scheduled to continue on Friday.

“Following the very sad news of the passing of the Queen and out of respect for her service to the country and her family, the union has decided to call off tomorrow’s planned strike action,” the Communication Workers Union said in a tweet on Thursday.

A strike by the postal workers late last month across 1,500 locations, the first of several strikes planned for the ensuing weeks, marked the biggest work stoppage in England since 2009.

Postal workers are seeking a wage increase amid the country’s near-historic inflation, which reached a 40-year high of 10.1% in July.

CWU said its members would not accept an “imposed” 2% pay raise, the BBC reported. Royal Mail said that the workers rejected an offer with raises of up to 5.5%.

Meanwhile, roughly 40,000 rail workers with the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers, or RMT, canceled a two-day strike set for Sept. 15 and 17.

“RMT joins the whole nation in paying its respects to Queen Elizabeth,” the union said in a statement. “We express our deepest condolences to her family, friends and the country.”

The rail workers, who work at Network Rail and 14 train operators, have carried out intermittent strikes since June, when it appeared that their employers would reject a demand for a 7% pay raise.

Network Rail made an offer in July with raises worth more than 5%, but it depended on workers accepting “modernising reforms,” the BBC reported. RMT rejected the offer, saying it amounted to a pay cut in inflation-adjusted terms and would require cutting a third of front-line maintenance roles.

In a statement, Network Rail confirmed that RMT had called off the strike, saying it would alert riders “when we receive more information on any confirmed or proposed industrial action.”

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Lawmakers in South Carolina at odds over proposed abortion bans

Lawmakers in South Carolina at odds over proposed abortion bans
Lawmakers in South Carolina at odds over proposed abortion bans
fstop123/Getty Images

(COLUMBIA, S.C.) — The South Carolina State Senate rejected a bill that would ban nearly all abortions just days after House lawmakers approved the ban.

The Senate went on to pass a separate bill that has an exception for fetuses born with a fatal anomaly. Both the House and Senate versions included exceptions for pregnancies that are a result of rape or incest; however, the Senate bill only allowed this exception if the abortion is performed within the first trimester of pregnancy.

When a physician performs an abortion under the rape or incest exceptions, the Senate bill requires the physician to report the allegations to his or her respective county sheriff’s department within 24 hours of performing or inducing the abortion. This includes reporting the name and contact information for the woman making the allegation. The physician would also be required to preserve a DNA sample from the fetal remains and submit the evidence to the country sheriff.

The physician would also be required to add a note to the woman’s medical records that the abortion was performed under the exception.

The Senate bill criminalizes providers who perform abortion services in the state. The bill makes it illegal to perform an abortion or administer, provide or distribute medication or drugs that induce an abortion. A person found guilty of providing an abortion could face a fine of up to $10,000 and jail time of up to two years.

The Senate bill also prevents Planned Parenthood from utilizing state funds for any purposes related to abortions.

South Carolina’s Supreme Court temporarily blocked a six-week abortion ban from going into effect in August. The temporary block was part of a lawsuit brought by Planned Parenthood in July. The organization alleged that the abortion ban is an invasion of privacy and a violation of equal protection under the state constitution.

The ban was signed into law in February 2021 by South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster and took effect June 27 when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Amid book bans, Virginia parents push for more ‘authority’ over what kids can read in school libraries

Amid book bans, Virginia parents push for more ‘authority’ over what kids can read in school libraries
Amid book bans, Virginia parents push for more ‘authority’ over what kids can read in school libraries
Diyosa Carter/Getty Images

(NEW YORK) — As cultural debates over access to books rage on in school districts across the country, a Republican lawmaker in Virginia is hoping to make it easier for parents to control what their children read in public school libraries.

“In school libraries across the Commonwealth, there are books that are in the libraries that are extremely sexual in nature,” Virginia delegate Tim Anderson told ABC News.

“We have to give parents more authority over the schools and what their children have access to while they’re in the schools,” he added.

Anderson, a Republican who represents parts of the cities of Norfolk and Virginia Beach, said that he plans to introduce a bill that would identify titles that contain “sexual content” and implement a rating system for library books that would essentially be based on the Motion Picture Association film rating system. Books would be marked with “Parental Advisory Warning” labels and parents would be able to opt their children out of reading books with a particular rating.

He said titles would be rated from G, appropriate for all audiences, to R, which restricts content to children under 17 years of age. If a child is 17, they can access the content with the supervision of a parent or guardian.

“This puts parents back in the driver’s seat,” Anderson said of his proposed legislation.

Anderson, an attorney, filed a lawsuit in May that attempted to stop Barnes & Noble bookstores from selling books that contain sexual content to children. The lawsuit, which was dismissed last month by a Virginia Beach Circuit Court judge, named graphic novel Gender Queer and A Court of Mist and Fury — two books that have been challenged or banned in various school districts across the country.

According to ABC affiliate in Hampton, Virginia, WVEC-TV, Judge Pamela Baskervill dismissed the case because Virginia law doesn’t grant circuit courts authority to determine if a book is obscene to minors.

Anderson said that since the lawsuit failed, he is now “looking for a legislative fix.”

Virginia state Senator Ghazala Hashmi, a Democrat, told WJLA-TV, an ABC affiliate in Washington, D.C., that the potential bill is “deeply concerning.”

“I’m concerned about this subset of parents who think that they can legislate what children are reading, and whose children get to read these materials,” Hashmi said. “Overwhelmingly, the books that we see targeted are by authors of minority communities or by LGBTQ authors. And it is unfortunate that they continue to push their particular perspective onto other families.”

Yael Levin-Sheldon, a parent in Virginia and chief communications officer of No Left Turn in Education, told ABC News that the nonprofit organization is part of a nationwide coalition advocating for a rating system and “fully supports” Anderson’s proposal.

“We are staunch believers in the First Amendment and the right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children,” Levin-Sheldon said. “Appropriately labeling books based on content, just as is done with movies, is a commonsense way to allow parents to decide what books are acceptable for their own children, without imposing their standards and values on other parents and their children.”

Books have been banned in at least 26 states and 86 school districts, with at least seven in Virginia, according to PEN America, a nonprofit organization working to advance freedom of expression through literature.

A PEN America report documenting book bans in school libraries and classrooms between July 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, shows that the spike in bans reflects a “disproportionate targeting of books by or about people whose identities and stories have traditionally been underrepresented in children’s and young adult literature, such as people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, or persons with disabilities.”

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed into law in April a bill that would give parents the authority to opt their children out of instructional content in classrooms that is deemed “sexually explicit.”

The Republican governor hailed the signing of Senate Bill 656 as delivering on “my Day One promises to give parents a greater say in their children’s education.”

But critics who opposed the legislation argued that what qualifies as “sexually explicit” is too vague and the law would make it easier for conservative advocates and organized groups to target and censor LGBTQ+ content.

“While SB 656 may not explicitly censor what books are taught, it puts teachers and librarians in the unenviable position of having to determine if a book qualifies under the policies,” the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement on April 8. “This will most likely result in censorship due to teacher and librarian’s fear or confusion over what qualifies as ‘sexually explicit content.'”

Anderson, a father of three, argued that the law gave “parents back their rights” by giving them more authority over the material their children are taught in the classroom. Now he hopes that his bill, which he plans to introduce in the coming weeks, would do the same when it comes to books available in public school libraries.

“This isn’t about gay, trans or straight literature,” he said, pushing back on the argument that the bill could lead to censorship. “This is about literature and books that have sexual content in it.”

Anderson’s proposed legislation is one of several initiatives in the state seeking to give parents more control over the material their children have access to in schools.

As children returned to the classroom this fall, Bedford County school libraries in Virginia launched a new notification system that enables parents to receive alerts about the books their children check out of the library.

“In response to some concerns brought up by a community member about the content in the libraries and curriculum, we’ve really had a year-long conversation about how we can be more transparent and inform parents,” said Shawn Trosper, director of curriculum and instruction for the school system, according to ABC affiliate in Lynchburg, WSET-TV.

Levin-Sheldon, who leads the Virginia chapter of No Left Turn in Education, told ABC News that she supports the alert system and hopes it would be implemented in additional counties across the state.

“At the end of the day, we just want the parents to have a choice in what their children are exposed to,” she said. “Because that choice is ours…that right is ours.”

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Miami school board votes against recognizing LGBTQ History Month

Miami school board votes against recognizing LGBTQ History Month
Miami school board votes against recognizing LGBTQ History Month
Chandan Khanna/AFP via Getty Images

(MIAMI) — The Miami-Dade County School board voted against recognizing October as LGBTQ history month in a 1-8 vote, as the effects of the Parental Rights in Education law continue to trickle down.

H-11, a resolution for Miami-Dade schools to formally recognize LGBTQ history month, stated that the month “has been established to remind all cultures within our wider community of the important roles that LGBTQ people have taken in shaping the social, historical, legal, and political worlds we live in today.” It was voted down on Wednesday.

This year, it included providing resources for 12th grade teachers to teach about major Supreme Court cases on same-sex marriage and anti-discrimination protections such as Obergefell v. Hodges and Bostock v. Clayton County.

In 2021, Miami school board members voted overwhelmingly to recognize the month — 7-1. Just one year later, the board took a different route. Board members expressed confusion over whether the initiative would break the classroom restrictions set by the Parental Rights in Education law.

The law, dubbed “Don’t Say Gay” by LGBTQ activists, bans classroom instruction on “sexual orientation or gender identity” in kindergarten through grade 3 or “in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.”

It went into effect in July.

Critics say that the law will silence LGBTQ people, as well as ignore the history of LGBTQ people in the U.S. Supporters say the law gives more power to the parents.

The meeting took a rowdy turn during the public comment portion of the night, with more than 100 people speaking that night, according to School Board vice chair Steve Gallon III. Debate over H-11 lasted more than five hours.

Andrea S. Pita Mendez, the 17-year-old school board’s student advisor, said after weeks of speaking to students, to teachers and others, she hoped the board would pass the initiative.

“Our students want this to pass,” said Mendez, who is not a voting member of the board. In an impassioned speech that stoked both applause and upset, Mendez told the board that LGBTQ history plays an important role in U.S. history.

“I heard many of you speak of the fact that in your generations this wasn’t seen, this wasn’t heard – you grew up in a very different time than we are,” she said.

Though the country is highly polarized, she said it “does not take away from the fact that we are the ones that sit in those classrooms, that we embrace diversity and inclusivity because we do love each other and we do support each other and we do want to see each other go very far in the world.”

Christi Fraga, who represents District 5, voted against the recognition both years, saying that H-11 creates a “hostile” environment.

“If we are going to allow the teachers to decide what will be taught in classrooms during this time, that concerns me,” Fraga said.

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Five things to know about Queen Elizabeth II’s life and legacy

Five things to know about Queen Elizabeth II’s life and legacy
Five things to know about Queen Elizabeth II’s life and legacy
Samir Hussein/WireImage

(LONDON) — Queen Elizabeth II died on Thursday at the age of 96, Buckingham Palace confirmed in a statement.

“The Queen died peacefully at Balmoral this afternoon,” the palace wrote, referencing Balmoral Castle in Scotland, the queen’s traditional summer residence. “The King and The Queen Consort will remain at Balmoral this evening and will return to London tomorrow.”

Elizabeth’s death comes just over two months after her Platinum Jubilee celebration, which marked her 70th year on on the British throne. The queen participated in a limited number of jubilee festivities, with palace officials citing health issues and “discomfort” that prevented her full attendance.

The queen, who was forced to use a walking stick in recent months, was determined to continue working through her health issues and as recently as Tuesday participated in an official appointment ceremony at Balmoral for the country’s new Prime Minister Liz Truss.

During her time on the throne, Elizabeth met countless foreign dignitaries and saw Britain through a number of historic events and landmark moments.

Here are five things to know about the British monarch and her 70-year reign:

She was the longest-reigning monarch in British history

Elizabeth was the longest-serving monarch in British history, surpassing even her great-great-grandmother Queen Victoria for the title in 2015.

She came into power at the age of 25 following her father King George VI’s death in 1952. Her coronation in 1953 was a national spectacle and was broadcast across the globe.

During her reign, Elizabeth was served by 15 British prime ministers, from Winston Churchill to Truss, and she met with 13 of the last 14 U.S. presidents.

The queen had four children, eight grandchildren and 12 great-grandchildren

Elizabeth married Philip Mountbatten, the duke of Edinburgh, on Nov. 20, 1947, at Westminster Abbey in London. In 2017, Prince Philip and the queen celebrated 70 years of marriage, making her the first monarch to celebrate a platinum wedding anniversary. Phillip died on April 9, 2021 at the age of 99.

Together, the couple had four children, their eldest being Prince Charles, who upon his mother’s death Thursday became known as King Charles III.

Elizabeth first became a grandmother in 1977 after her daughter Princess Anne gave birth to son Peter Phillips.

Over the next three decades, the queen welcomed seven more grandchildren: Zara Phillips Tindall, Prince William, Prince Harry, Princess Beatrice, Princess Eugenie, Lady Louise Windsor, and James, Viscount Severn.

Elizabeth was also a great-grandmother to 12 children: Savannah and Isla Phillips; Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis; Mia, Lena, and Lucas Philip Tindall; Archie Harrison and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor; August Philip Hawke Brooksbank; and Sienna Elizabeth Mapelli Mozzi.

Lilibet, whose father is Prince Harry, made history upon her birth in June 2021 as the queen’s first great-grandchild to be born outside of the U.K.

She was an international head of state

Elizabeth, who never technically owned a passport, made more than 270 trips abroad during her time as queen.

She was the head of the Commonwealth of Nations, a political association of 56 member states, composed mostly of former British territories. The queen was recognized as the constitutional monarch of 15 sovereign states in the Commonwealth including Canada, The Bahamas and New Zealand.

A queen of many firsts

During seven decades as head of the royal family, Elizabeth made history time and time again, starting from her very first day on the throne.

Elizabeth’s coronation in 1953 was the first coronation ceremony to be broadcast on TV and it was watched by a record-breaking 27 million people in the U.K. alone.

She also started the royal tradition of greeting the public, known as a “walkabout,” during a tour in Sydney in 1970.

In terms of her stately duties, Elizabeth made many critical diplomatic firsts, including visiting West Germany in 1965, upon which she became the first British monarch to visit Germany in 52 years. She also became the first British monarch to visit China in October 1986.

Elizabeth made her way to the U.S. in 1991 where she to be the first British monarch to address the U.S. Congress.

Her health had been declining in recent months

Elizabeth’s health had been deteriorating in the months leading up to her death.

On May 10, she missed the State Opening of Parliament ceremony, which formally marks the start of a new parliamentary session, for only the third time in her 70-year reign. The two other times she missed the ceremony were due to pregnancies.

The queen tested positive for COVID-19 in February after it was confirmed that Charles and his wife, Camilla, now-queen consort, had also tested positive for the virus. While Buckingham Palace said the queen experienced “mild cold-like symptoms” at the time, she was eventually forced to cancel some of her virtual engagements amid her recovery.

The queen, who previously had surgery in both knees to remove cartilage in 2003, began using a walking stick in late 2021.

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

British PM Liz Truss reveals plan to freeze energy prices. Would it work in US?

British PM Liz Truss reveals plan to freeze energy prices. Would it work in US?
British PM Liz Truss reveals plan to freeze energy prices. Would it work in US?
Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

(LONDON) — New British Prime Minister Liz Truss on Thursday responded to skyrocketing energy prices in dramatic fashion with plans for a freeze on natural gas and electricity bills for millions of households that face massive rate increases as the winter months approach.

The policy could amount to one of the country’s largest government interventions in recent history, costing tens of billions of pounds and reducing prices on a wide scale.

The plan arrives amid an energy shortage brought about by the Russia-Ukraine war, which has worsened Britain’s inflation crisis, helping send price increases in the country soaring to a 40-year high of 10.1%.

Britain is hardly alone with its inflation woes. Sky-high inflation has strained economies and household budgets across the world, including in the United States, where cost hikes have slowed but remain near decades-long highs.

Rather than price controls, U.S. inflation policy has relied on a series of aggressive borrowing cost increases as the Federal Reserve tries to slash price increases by slowing the economy and choking off demand. But the approach risks tipping the U.S. into an economic downturn and putting millions out of work.

Economists who spoke with ABC News acknowledged the potential effectiveness of the British policy as a means of targeting that nation’s energy price spike but they differed sharply on whether the plan offers a blueprint that the U.S. should consider for sectors of high inflation.

Here’s how the British policy will work, and whether experts think it could be implemented in the U.S.:

What does Britain’s energy price cap do?

The plan, which would go into effect next month and last two years, caps the annual cost of natural gas and electricity for a typical British household at £2,500. The plan would do the same for many non-domestic institutions, such as schools; but those price caps only last six months.

The average annual cost for natural gas and electricity was otherwise scheduled to spike next month from £1,971 to £3,549, and thereby take up a sizable proportion of monthly spending for many British households.

Under the plan, the British government will pay energy suppliers the shortfall leftover from the reduction in the retail price. Truss, a member of the Conservative party, has not announced the cost of the measure but some estimates put the cost at roughly £150 billion, making it more than twice the size of the initiative that allowed British companies to keep paying workers amid COVID.

“This is a huge piece of state intervention ironically overseen by a conservative government suspicious of the state,” said Matthew Goodwin, a London-based professor of politics at the University of Kent.

Moreover, energy suppliers will receive the same amount of payment for their goods that they would have if the retail price had jumped, since the government is covering the shortfall.

This payment mechanism causes the large price tag for the British government and differentiates the policy from the price controls imposed in the U.S. during World War II, for instance, in which companies were asked to sacrifice profits for the war effort, said Hal Singer, a managing director at the consulting firm Econ One and adjunct professor at Georgetown’s McDonough School of Business.

“The reason why the U.K. policy is costly is because Truss is insisting that energy suppliers continue to be compensated at market rates,” Singer told ABC News.

Should a policy like this be implemented in the U.S.?

The energy crisis caused by the Russia-Ukraine war has not impacted the U.S. as much as many countries, especially those in Europe.

However, overall inflation in the U.S. remains historically high, with price hikes for goods such such as rent and groceries far worse than cost increases in other areas of the economy. That dynamic raises the question of whether an approach like the one announced by Britain could work to address particularly severe areas of U.S. inflation.

Singer, of Econ One, said the U.S. should pursue such a strategy to bring down costs like skyrocketing rents, which result in part from the outsized market control retained by landlords.

“We absolutely should be pursuing these alternative remedies to address what many of us are starting to see now as the exercise of market power,” he said. “There’s a comparable crisis in the U.S. in terms of rents for apartments and homes.”

But Orazem sharply disagreed, saying that price controls would worsen the root problem behind inflation: a supply shortage. Price controls risk undercutting the incentive that high prices give to companies for increased investment and ramped up supply, which in theory should bring the market to equilibrium, he said.

“Creating supply shortages in the middle of inflation that’s created by supply shortages seems ludicrous to me,” he said. “You’re not solving the problem by exacerbating the problem.”

Copyright © 2022, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.