News

(ATLANTA) — Fulton County prosecutor Nathan Wade has come to a “temporary agreement” canceling an upcoming hearing in his divorce proceedings that have embroiled Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her Georgia election interference case against former President Donald Trump.

The move comes on the eve of a hearing in the case that had the potential to draw the sworn testimony of Wade, who is alleged to have been involved in an improper relationship with Willis that allegedly resulted in financial gain for both of them.

The development would appear to prevent the release of any records pertaining to the allegations involving Wade and Willis that could have arisen at the hearing.

Andrea Hastings, the attorney for Wade’s wife, told ABC News, “The divorce moves forward.”

“We still have a lot of work to do, preparing for either settlement or trial,” Hastings told ABC News.

“The parties, by and through their counsel of record, have entered into a temporary agreement addressing all issues presently before the Court,” the order said. “Then parties have further agreed that the terms and provisions of this temporary agreement shall not be filed with the court.”

As such, the hearing originally scheduled for Wednesday is canceled, the order said.

Michael Roman, one of Trump’s co-defendants in the Georgia election interference case, is seeking to dismiss the indictment against him and disqualify Willis, alleging she “engaged in a personal, romantic relationship” with Wade, allegedly resulted in financial gain for both.

Trump, Roman, and 17 others pleaded not guilty in August to all charges in a sweeping racketeering indictment for alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in the state of Georgia.

Defendants Kenneth Chesebro, Sidney Powell, Jena Ellis and Scott Hall subsequently took plea deals in exchange for agreeing to testify against other defendants.

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

(NEW YORK) — More than a dozen Harvard University students have filed a civil rights complaint with the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights demanding an investigation into Harvard’s alleged failure to protect pro-Palestinian students from harassment, intimidation and threats, according to the Muslim Legal Fund of America, which filed the complaint.

The Muslim Legal Fund of America alleges that the students have been targeted with “rampant harassment and racist attacks including doxxing, stalking and assault simply for being Palestinian, Muslim, and supporters of Palestinian rights.”

The group alleges that some students have been assaulted for wearing keffiyehs, traditional Palestinian scarves.

“Instead of providing protection or resources, Harvard responded to the students’ requests for help with closed doors, and in some cases threats — by those in positions of power — to limit or retract the students’ future academic opportunities,” the Muslim Legal Fund of America said in a statement.

The students who filed the complaint attend Harvard College, Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard Divinity School and Harvard Law School.

After the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights receives a complaint, it evaluates and determines whether it will open an investigation, according to the agency.

Harvard University told ABC News it did not have a comment regarding the complaint, but pointed to a list of supports and resources the university put in place for students and pointed to last Friday’s announcement of a Presidential Taskforce on Combating Islamophobia and Anti-Arab Bias.

Since the Oct. 7 attack on Israel, college students — including students from Jewish and pro-Israel communities — told ABC News that they do not feel safe on campus and they do not feel supported by their universities, including Harvard.

Three college students of Palestinian descent were shot in Burlington, Vermont, in November. The shooting is being investigated as a possible hate crime.

Earlier this month, a group of Jewish students at Harvard University filed a federal lawsuit claiming the school has “become a bastion of rampant anti-Jewish hatred and harassment” and alleging the administration has failed to protect them.

“Jewish students on campus have been subjected to a really hostile environment in which they have been intimidated, harassed and in some instances physically assaulted because they’re Jewish,” attorney Marc Kasowitz, who is representing the Jewish students in the legal action, told ABC News Thursday. “Right now, the Jewish students on campus at Harvard are afraid for their own physical safety and to express their views about current events.”

A spokesperson for Harvard University issued a statement at the time to ABC News, saying, “We do not comment on pending litigation.”

Palestinian students told ABC News in December that they felt Islamophobia has been treated with less gravity than antisemitism.

After at least 30 student groups at Harvard released a letter in December blaming, in part, the Israeli regime for “all unfolding violence” in the wake of Hamas’ attack. Students in groups that signed onto the letter have faced public outrage and harassment, including doxxing.

Several groups have since retracted their signatures and the authors of the letter later released a statement clarifying that they do not condone violence against civilians.

“Our statement’s purpose was clear: to address the root cause of all the violence unfolding. To state what should be clear: PSC staunchly opposes all violence against all innocent life and laments all human suffering,” the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee said in a subsequent statement.

In the wake of the Hamas attack on Israel, a bus was seen driving through campus streets with a banner that read “Harvard’s Leading Antisemites” and video screens showing the names and faces of students who allegedly signed onto the letter.

Harvard President Claudine Gay resigned earlier this month in part because of criticism of her reaction to alleged antisemitism on campus and her response to questions from lawmakers during a hearing on Capitol Hill in December. Gay has also faced accusations of plagiarism in old academic work.

Provost Alan Garber is now serving as interim president.

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

(WASHINGTON) — A longtime business partner of Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin, said in a closed-door interview Tuesday with members of the House Oversight Committee that he is “not aware of any financial transactions or compensation” that then-Vice President Joe Biden received related to business conducted by this family members, calling the allegations “preposterous,” according to Schwerin’s opening statement obtained by ABC News.

Schwerin was called the appear before the Oversight Committee as part of the Republican-led impeachment inquiry into the President Joe Biden, for whom Schwerin previously worked as a financial adviser before going into business with his son, Hunter Biden.

“I am not aware of any financial transactions or compensation that Vice President Biden received related to business conducted by any of his family members or their associates nor any involvement by him in their businesses. None,” Schwerin told the committee, according to his statement.

“I cannot recall any requests for Vice President Biden to take any official action on behalf of any of Hunter’s clients or his business deals, foreign or domestic,” Schwerin said. “In fact, I am not aware of any role that Vice President Biden, as a public official or a private citizen, had in any of Hunter’s business activities. None.”

Schwerin, who “managed almost every aspect of [Hunter Biden’s] financial life” for years, according to Kathleen Buhle, Hunter Biden’s ex-wife, in her 2022 memoir, “If We Break,” also told committee members that he never asked President Biden to “take any official actions for the benefit of Hunter’s clients or any other client.”

“Furthermore, I have no recollection of any promises or suggestions made by Hunter or myself to any clients or business associates that his father would take any official actions on their behalf. None,” he said.

According to what Schwerin said he previously told Oversight Committee staff, between 2009 and 2017 he performed a number of administrative and bookkeeping tasks for then-Vice President Joe Biden related to his household finances, and helped him and his accountants in their preparation of his taxes and his annual financial disclosure statements.

Schwerin told the Oversight Committee Tuesday that “in my discussions with the Vice President concerning his personal finances, he was always crystal clear that he wanted to take the most transparent and ethical approach consistent with both the spirit and the letter of the law.”

“Given my awareness of his finances and the explicit directions he gave to his financial advisers, the allegation that he would engage in any improper conduct to benefit himself or his family is preposterous to me,” Schwerin said.

Schwerin is the latest associate of Hunter Biden to speak with the committee, following recent appearances by associates Rob Walker and Kevin Morris.

Republicans have accused President Biden of using his office when he was vice president to “coordinate with Hunter Biden’s business partners about Hunter’s role in Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company,” citing an email exchange between Schwerin and the vice president’s then-communications staffer Kate Bedingfield collaborate on a response to questions from the media about Hunter Biden’s appointment to the board of Burisma.

In response to the allegations by House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, White House spokesperson Ian Sams tweeted in September: “More lies by @JamesComer. As Comer tells it, then-VP Biden ‘colluded’ with this business by … saying he doesn’t endorse it and wasn’t involved with it? Total nonsense.”

Hunter Biden was subpoenaed late last year to sit for a closed-door deposition with the Oversight Committee — a move that Hunter Biden initially resisted but ultimately agreed to earlier this month, under threat of a contempt vote. He is now scheduled to sit with lawmakers in late February.

The Biden impeachment inquiry, launched unilaterally by now-ousted House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and then formalized months later by the House in a party-line vote, has yet to yield any concrete evidence to support GOP claims that Joe Biden participated in and profited from his son and family’s foreign business dealings.

President Biden has denied any wrongdoing.

The younger Biden, meanwhile, is facing unrelated gun and tax charges, to which he has pleaded not guilty. On Tuesday his attorney, Abbe Lowell, filed a series of court papers after special counsel David Weiss earlier this month rebutted his efforts to dismiss the gun charges.

“The filings made by the prosecutors provide more evidence that these charges result from a politically motivated attack instigated by former President Trump and his MAGA allies,” Lowell said in a statement.

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

(OXFORD, Mich.) — Jennifer Crumbley’s trial continued on Tuesday with witnesses testifying about the morning of the 2021 Oxford High School shooting in Michigan. Andrew Smith, the CEO of the real estate company where Jennifer Crumbley worked at the time of the shooting, testified that she would have been allowed to leave for the day if she needed to take care of her son.

Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of school shooter Ethan Crumbley, pleaded not guilty to four counts of involuntary manslaughter for her alleged role in the shooting.

Ethan Crumbley, who was 15 at the time of the shooting, was sentenced to life in prison without parole in December for killing four students and injuring seven others in November 2021.

Smith testified that Jennifer Crumbley would have also been allowed to bring her son to the office the day of the shooting if needed. She had told school officials that they couldn’t take Ethan home after a meeting on the day of the shooting because both parents had to work.

He also testified that he saw Jennifer Crumbley racing down the hall, telling him that there was an active shooter at her son’s school.

Jennifer Crumbley texted Smith minutes after leaving the office that “the gun is gone and so are the bullets,” according to evidence of the texts.

Smith testified that he was “taken aback” and “surprised” when he received a text from Jennifer Crumbley after the shooting that said, “I need my job. Please don’t judge me for what my son did.”

Crumbley was terminated from her job days after the shooting, Smith testified.

Video played in court on Tuesday showed Jennifer Crumbley sitting in the back of a police car as detectives searched her house in the hours after the school shooting.

In the video, she could be heard telling Sgt. Matthew Peschke of the Oakland County Sheriff’s Department — who was in the squad car with her — that her son was a “good kid” and she and her husband are “not bad people.”

“This is f—– up. Like, I just, my son just ruined his life. I’ll probably never see him again,” Jennifer Crumbley said as she started to cry.

At other points in the video, she asked Peschke for a cigarette and even took a short phone call while sitting in the back of the squad car.

During the search of the house, Oakland County Sheriff’s Detective Adam Stoyek testified they found an open gun box and an empty box of ammunition for the 9 mm Sig Sauer handgun used in the shooting, as well as gun range targets with bullet holes taped to the shooter’s bedroom wall and an empty bottle of whiskey next to his bed. They also found two more weapons in a locked gun safe that could be opened with the default code of 0-0-0.

Nicholas Ejak, who worked as the dean of students at Oxford High School at the time of the shooting, testified about the morning of the shooting, including meeting with the Crumbley parents when concerns were raised about the Ethan Crumbley.

Ejak testified that the school asked the Crumbley parents to get him counseling that day and informed the parents of resources to get that help, including options that would have allowed them to get him help immediately.

Ejak testified that the parents chose to have their son return to class. He also said he was the one who retrieved Ethan’s backpack from his math class and returned it to him. The backpack contained the gun Ethan used in the shooting, but Ejak said he didn’t search his bag because he “didn’t have reasonable suspicion to do that.”

Ejak testified that if Ethan Crumbley were to go home, his parents said he would have to walk home and remain alone. School officials, who were worried about his mental health, did not think it was a good idea for him to be alone since they were concerned he was considering suicide.

Throughout his testimony, Ejak stressed that Ethan Crumbley’s actions in the days leading up to the shooting — including Googling bullets at school, watching shooting videos in class and drawing violent images on his papers — did not warrant the school taking steps to discipline him. Instead, he said, the school felt Ethan was experiencing mental health issues and were concerned about him, saying that would “supersede” any discipline concerns.

Amanda Holland, a co-worker of Jennifer Crumbley, also testified about speaking with Jennifer the morning of the shooting and the nature of her relationship. Holland testified that the morning of the shooting, Jennifer Crumbley told her she had a rough night and that Ethan Crumbley had been “locked out” of the house. It wasn’t clear to Holland if Ethan had been purposefully locked out by his parents or if he had forgotten his keys.

On Monday, video of police’s first interrogation of the Crumbley parents, just hours after the shooting, was shown in court.

At one point in the video, Jennifer Crumbley is seen scrolling through her phone. The prosecution tried to suggest this was not normal behavior for a mother who had just learned her son had committed a school shooting. The defense tried to counter that by pointing out that Jennifer was sharing messages she had received from her son with police.

At one point in the video, his parents are taken to the room where Ethan Crumbley is being held and Jennifer Crumbley appear to ask the shooter, “Why?”

Oxford High School counselor Shawn Hopkins testified he met with Ethan Crumbley and his parents just hours before the shooting happened after he drew disturbing images on a math worksheet.

Hopkins testified that he previously interacted with Ethan Crumbley on a couple of occasions earlier in 2021, after teachers had reached out to Hopkins to share their concerns over Ethan Crumbley’s behavior.

On the morning of the shooting, Hopkins called Ethan Crumbley to his office over the images he had drawn on his math paper. Ethan Crumbley initially told Hopkins the drawings were related to a video game. Hopkins said he began to ask more pointed questions to get beyond the “video game” idea, and that’s when the shooter’s demeanor shifted and he became sad.

He told Hopkins that his friend moved, his family dog and a grandparent had recently died, he was struggling with COVID-19 and attending school during the pandemic, and that he had argued with his parents about grades the night before.

After this discussion, Hopkins said he called Jennifer Crumbley to come to the school right away. The counselor said he was concerned the shooter was displaying “suicidal ideation,” and that he should seek help immediately.

Hopkins said he did not explicitly ask the parents to remove the shooter from school, however, he testified that he asked the parents to get the shooter therapeutic help that day, if possible. Jennifer Crumbley “made it clear” that they wouldn’t be able to take the shooter for help that day, Hopkins said.

Because the parents weren’t taking the student home that morning, the counselor expressed concern about the shooter being alone, since he was believed to be potentially suicidal. Ethan Crumbley requested to remain in class, and the parents were on board with him staying in class, so the shooter was allowed to return to his normal schedule before the shooting began, according to the counselor’s testimony.

Kira Pennock, who managed the barn where the Crumbleys kept their two horses, walked through messages she exchanged with Jennifer Crumbley on the day of the shooting and the days following where the two women work out a potential deal for Pennock to buy the horses.

ABC News’ Whitney Lloyd contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

(WICHITA, Kan.) — A statue of baseball legend Jackie Robinson stolen from a Kansas park was found dismantled and burned in a trash can fire Tuesday morning in what authorities called a “disgraceful” act, as the search for the perpetrators continues.

The statue was taken from McAdams Park in Wichita last week. Surveillance video captured individuals entering Jackie Robinson Pavilion around midnight on Thursday, removing the statue and placing it in a pickup truck. They cut off the statue at the ankles, leaving behind only Robinson’s feet, with damages estimated to be around $75,000.

Around 8:38 a.m. local time on Tuesday, the Wichita Fire Department responded to a report of a trash can fire at Garvey Park, according to Wichita police spokesperson Andrew Ford.

After extinguishing the fire, they found what appeared to be pieces of the Robinson statue, “which is not salvageable at this time,” Ford told reporters during a press briefing Tuesday.

The Wichita Fire Department is investigating the arson, while police continue to investigate the theft, Ford said.

“It’s really disheartening to see the remnants of the statue, the disgraceful way it’s been disrespected,” Wichita Police Chief Joe Sullivan said during the briefing. “This is a direct indication of the pressure our investigators are putting on the perpetrators that committed this act.”

Sullivan urged those involved in any way to turn themselves in.

“Either way, we will be arresting several people for what they’ve done to our community,” the chief said.

Police said Monday they have recovered the truck they believe was used to haul away the statue. Sullivan did not provide any additional updates on the vehicle Tuesday.

The statue was built by artist John Parsons and donated to the community by League 42, a nonprofit named after Robinson’s number with the Brooklyn Dodgers, which aims to introduce baseball to the youth of Wichita.

“This was a heartbreaking discovery this morning. I hate to see that the statue was not in one piece,” Wichita Council member Brandon Johnson said at the briefing. “But I do want everyone to know that we are undeterred and making sure that that statue gets rebuilt and put back there for our community, for League 42, for the young people.”

“That symbol of hope will only be gone for a short time,” he continued.

League 42 founder and CEO Bob Lutz told reporters that the mold from the original statue is still viable, and that they intend to replace the piece in the coming months.

“It will be a joyous occasion — unlike today, unlike the past five days,” Lutz said. “We’re ready for some joy. We’re ready for some happiness.”

League 42 paid about $50,000 for the sculpture, which was installed in 2021, according to The Associated Press.

Johnson said funds for a new statue are being raised through a GoFundMe campaign and local businesses.

“I’m confident we can get that statue back for our young people and community to enjoy,” Johnson said.

Robinson is known for breaking the color barrier in the modern era of MLB. He played for the Kansas City Monarchs in the Negro Leagues and for the minor league Montreal Royals before being signed to the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1947.

The signing signaled the end of segregated baseball and led to other Black players joining the major leagues. During his time with the Dodgers, Robinson won Rookie of the Year in 1947, was named National League MVP in 1949. He was a six-time All-Star, won the World Series in 1955 and was elected to the Hall of Fame in 1962.

ABC News’ Mary Kekatos contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.