Iran war costs $38 billion as CBO warns of higher inflation, depleted weapons

Iran war costs  billion as CBO warns of higher inflation, depleted weapons
Iran war costs $38 billion as CBO warns of higher inflation, depleted weapons
Ships are anchored in the Strait of Hormuz on Aug. 10, 2026, off the coast of Bandar Abbas, Iran. (Ali Saeedi/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — The war with Iran has cost the United States at least $38 billion through the end of July and is expected to further push inflation higher for American households, according to a nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) assessment released Tuesday.

The CBO also warned that depleted weapon stocks could take a half decade or longer to rebuild, crippling the Pentagon’s ability to respond to another major conflict.

The assessment describes the financial and military consequences that will persist beyond the fighting, leaving the Pentagon with fewer weapons available for another major conflict while skyrocketing energy prices put pressure on household budgets.

The report notes that the Pentagon did not cooperate with the analysis or provide information requested by the Congressional Budget Office. The Pentagon did not respond to ABC News’ request for comment on the report.

The CBO serves as Congress’ scorekeeper, providing lawmakers with independent estimates of federal spending and the costs of legislation. Its reports noted it relied heavily on public information.

The budget office’s estimate covers direct costs from the U.S. and Israel launching their campaign against Iran on Feb. 28 through Aug. 1, excluding expenses related to U.S. bases devastated by Iranian bombardments.

Munitions account for most of the spending. CBO projects another $2 to $3 billion in monthly costs, but says the bill could climb during sustained fighting.

Americans will also bear what could be mounting costs adding to already inflation rates, with projections estimating the consequences of the war to add roughly a half percentage point to the inflation rate early next year, meaning the costs of goods, housing and food will continue to rise, driven largely by climbing energy prices stemming from supply disruptions in the Middle East.

Depleted weapons stockpiles

The war has significantly depleted U.S. inventories of missiles and anti-air defense weapons, leaving fewer munitions available for another major conflict.

“The shortfall would become especially problematic if a conflict arose with an opponent whose arsenal included large numbers of ballistic and cruise missiles,” the CBO said in its report.

Those concerns predate the Iran war. A congressionally mandated commission warned in 2024 that the U.S. could largely exhaust its munitions inventories within three to four weeks of a conflict with China. Some critical weapons, including anti-ship missiles, could run out within days.

“Missile defense interceptors are in short supply because they have been produced at relatively low rates; thus, DoD’s inventory of such missiles was limited,” the CBO said in its report.

A Pentagon inspector general report on Monday came to the same conclusion that the massive expenditure of munitions against Iran has “resulted in strategic inventory shortfalls,” which revealed significant issues with U.S. force’s ability to resupply, as missiles take years to build. Persistent bottlenecks include the complexity and daunting list of materials and the recruitment of skilled labor to build them.

Patriot and SM-6 interceptors, used to shoot down incoming missiles and drones, cost roughly $4 million each, according to the CBO. THAAD interceptors cost about $12 million apiece, while more advanced SM-3 interceptors can cost roughly $28 million each.

The stark warning on munitions shortages comes just days after Adm. Brad Cooper, the war’s top commander, said in an interview on CBS Sunday that he’s not concerned about munitions depletions.

“We’re armed and ready for any contingency,” he said.

President Donald Trump on Monday dismissed the Pentagon IG’s report. The administration has maintained the Pentagon can continue fighting with the arsenal it has.

Care for casualties, damage to bases will push up costs

The war’s ultimate cost is likely to be far higher once decades of veterans’ disability payments and medical care are included. More than 800 U.S. troops have been wounded, with traumatic brain injuries emerging as the conflict’s signature wound.

“Counting munitions expended while leaving veterans’ care and benefits is not a real war-cost analysis,” Rep. Mark Takano, the ranking Democrat on the House Veterans Affairs Committee said in a statement to ABC News. “It is a bill sent to veterans and taxpayers later.”

CBO’s estimate excludes much of the costs associated with the damage to U.S. bases in the Middle East, including those in Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan, some of which have been devastated by Iranian bombardments. Pentagon planners have long anticipated shrinking the military’s footprint in the region to shift resources to the Pacific.

The analysis comes as Congress has not enacted funding to cover the costs of the Iran war. In July, the House passed a $95 billion budget blueprint to provide up to $60 billion for military funding. The plan would also provide up to $13 billion for intelligence costs, totaling $73 billion to cover the Iran war.

The Senate has no immediate plans to move on the budget blueprint to provide Iran war funding before the midterm elections. Historically, conflicts have had special supplemental funding as to not eat much into the military’s day-to-day operational needs in its $1 trillion budget.

ABC News was first to report that the Army has dramatically scaled down much of its training this year, partly to accommodate the enormous surprise expense of the conflict.

“Well, not before the election. No, I mean that’ll probably be a post-election push,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters on Tuesday.

House Budget Committee ranking Democrat Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania said the report “makes clear that the war has also cost American taxpayers tens of billions of dollars and counting, while continuing to drive up costs.”

“Donald Trump and Republicans have spent years telling Americans that we cannot afford to help families here at home, but apparently they can find tens of billions of dollars, and potentially much more, for a reckless war that is leaving Americans to pay the price,” Boyle said in a statement.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Measles-related deaths in Pennsylvania rise to 4, health officials say

Measles-related deaths in Pennsylvania rise to 4, health officials say
Measles-related deaths in Pennsylvania rise to 4, health officials say
Illustration of measles virus particle. (Getty Images/Kateryna Kon/Science Photo Library)

(NEW YORK) — Pennsylvania health officials confirmed two additional measles-associated deaths in the state on Tuesday, bringing the total number of deaths in 2026 to four.

The health department said it would not share any additional details about the deaths. 

The last time the U.S. reported 4 measles deaths was in 1992. Last year, Texas reported two deaths and New Mexico reported one. 

This is a developing story.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Judge blocks adding Trump tribute to Kennedy Center facade

Judge blocks adding Trump tribute to Kennedy Center facade
Judge blocks adding Trump tribute to Kennedy Center facade
The Kennedy Center on Sept. 2, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Finn Gomez/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — One month after the board of the Kennedy Center voted to add President Donald Trump’s name to the historic building, a judge has blocked the leadership of the performing arts center from adding a tribute to Trump on the facade of the building. 

The ruling came less than an hour before the board was scheduled to meet Tuesday to consider whether to close the center indefinitely.

U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, following a conference Tuesday morning, issued a written order blocking the attempt to add Trump’s name to the building, concluding it violated a previous court order and congressional statute. 

“Simply put, Defendants cannot install memorials for President Trump or anyone or anything else at the Kennedy Center without Congress’s blessing. The board resolution bucks a federal court order and a statute Congress enacted,” Cooper wrote. 

Judge Cooper previously blocked Trump from renaming the Kennedy Center after himself, but the board voted last month to add Trump’s name to the building nonetheless, in order to recognize him as the person who “renovated and restored” the iconic structure. 

“Linguistic gymnastics cannot extricate the Kennedy Center’s Board from an operative judicial order or the governing statute it was designed to enforce,” Cooper wrote in Tuesday’s ruling.

Judge Cooper’s ruling blocks the Trump administration from adding Trump’s name to the building — along the lines of “The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts renovated and restored by President Donald J. Trump” — as well as renaming the site of the center “President Donald J. Trump Plaza.” The judge did not decide about another proposal to say the Kennedy Center is “endowed by the Trump Kennedy Center Fund,” because the money has not yet been raised for the fund. 

Cooper also pushed back on the assertion that the future of the Kennedy Center relies on Trump’s fundraising. He noted that Congress also already appropriated $257 million for the center’s renovation, and suggested that the president’s allies manufactured the Kennedy Center’s financial problems.  

“The renaming of the Center coincided with declines in revenue and contributions, as artists cancelled performances, the Washington National Opera ended its 50-year residency, and ticket sales and viewership of the Kennedy Center Honors broadcast dropped precipitously,” Cooper wrote. 

Judge Cooper also said that the Kennedy Center has failed to provide any evidence to demonstrate that “current or future donations hinge on President Trump’s name being on the building.”

“The Court may not license a violation of those authorities under threat that some unidentified donors will withhold their largesse if the Board is not allowed to have its way. It can even less reward a decision by Board members, including the Chair, to curb the Center’s fundraising efforts because they cannot abide statutory restrictions on displaying his name,” the ruling said. “Predictions of future actions by the Board in response to being told no therefore cannot concern the Court.”

The Board of Trustees was scheduled to meet Tuesday afternoon, though the Trump administration overnight said the meeting would be “focused exclusively on the necessary closure” of the center, and not on additional ways to honor President Trump. Trustees were expected to vote on a measure declaring that the Kennedy Center’s main building is “unsafe for continued occupancy” and must be closed for a two-year renovation. 

Kennedy Center leadership had previously argued that adding the president’s name to the structure would be necessary to save the center from “certain fiscal collapse within weeks.”

“The Board understands that without such appropriate recognition it is unlikely that President Trump will provide the fundamental oversight of the renovation of the main building and lead the fiscal rescue of the Center,” said a resolution initially scheduled to be introduced today before it was delayed for a future meeting. 

In their late-night court filing, Justice Department lawyers included an email sent to the board at 7 p.m. Monday by Kennedy Center official Joe LaFauci, indicating that a separate draft resolution proposing ten new ways to honor Trump would not be considered, and that the board “stands by” its earlier vote to recognize the president.

LaFauci in his email said the update to Tuesday’s agenda was due “to the recently exacerbated structural emergencies” at the center, the court filing said.

Late on Monday night, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick separately posted security video of a partial ceiling collapse that occurred during a rainstorm earlier this month. The video shows a chunk of debris crashing onto an empty red carpet.

“If a performance had been underway, patrons could have been killed,” Lutnick said in his post on social media. “People cannot be allowed to go into this building any longer.”

The center voted in December to add Trump’s name on the outside of the building before a federal judge, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, ordered its removal in May.

The board voted 23-3 last month on a resolution to close the facility for two years as part of a $285 million renovation plan, according to a court filing. The board, members of which were largely appointed by Trump, also voted to add Trump’s name back onto the Kennedy Center building as many as two more times, according to the filing.

While Congress already appropriated $257 million for the project, the board has argued that Trump would raise another $100 million for the center.

The board as it voted last month said it would re-add Trump’s name to the building as the man who “renovated and restored” the center, adding, if a fundraising goal is hit, that it had been endowed by the “Trump Kennedy Center Fund.”

But Cooper is currently weighing whether that would violate a statute prohibiting additional memorials at D.C.’s only memorial to former President John F. Kennedy. Cooper is set to hold a 10 a.m. ET scheduling conference on the future plans for the center and the board is preparing to meet privately at 12:30 p.m. ET. 

Trustees are expected to vote on Tuesday afternoon on a measure declaring the Kennedy Center’s main building “unsafe for continued occupancy,” and ordering that it be “closed to patrons forthwith.”

Cooper is also positioned to eventually decide whether the board can move forward with its latest plans to close the center, plans that have taken on new urgency following the ceiling collapse and the new claim of center officials that the entity is quickly running out of money to remain operational. 

An attorney for Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio), who has filed a lawsuit challenging the planned closure and renaming, praised the decision not to move forward with another resolution honoring the president.

“Trump & cronies back down on HALF of the crazy,” lawyer Norm Eisen wrote on social media on Tuesday. But Eisen added that the plan to immediately close the center amounts to “foolishness” that he said Beatty’s legal team will fight.

Programming at the Kennedy Center, which normally funds its operations, effectively ended in early July. Ticket sales had reportedly been dropping off for months prior, following the board’s vote last December to rename the facility. Cooper ruled that move unlawful in May.

Despite Congress-approve funding that’s already on the table, center officials last weekend again underscored the need to honor Trump so that he might be enticed to lead additional efforts at raising money and oversee the renovation.

“The Board understands that without such appropriate recognition it is unlikely that President Trump will provide the fundamental oversight of the renovation of the main building and lead the fiscal rescue of the Center,” read the text of a draft resolution that is — according to LaFauci — no longer up for consideration today. 

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Former FEMA administrator speaks out about Kristi Noem’s downfall, deadly Texas flooding

Former FEMA administrator speaks out about Kristi Noem’s downfall, deadly Texas flooding
Former FEMA administrator speaks out about Kristi Noem’s downfall, deadly Texas flooding
David Richardson attends the initial meeting of the Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington, May 20, 2025. (Tia Dufour/DHS)

(WASHINGTON) — The former acting Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) administrator said that Texas got the help it needed during the historic and deadly flooding over July Fourth weekend last year, despite criticism heaped on the agency’s response, according to a new book set for release on Tuesday.

In the book, titled “Texas Flood: Power, Money, Politics, History, Bureaucracy and Tragedy,” David Richardson also outlined what he believed to be the source of former Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem’s downfall as well as discussing the Trump administration’s plans to restructure the agency.

“I prepared for the worst from the minute I got to FEMA, and a worst-case scenario did happen and we were able to effectively maneuver around obstacles to make sure that the people of Texas got what they needed in their time of need,” Richardson told ABC News in an interview. He said the agency prepared for worst-case scenarios “though a series of planning efforts and exercises.”

Democrats accused DHS of being slow on the response efforts in Texas. DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Richardson resigned from FEMA abruptly in December 2025.

At the center of that decision was a memo put by Noem requiring that every contract above $100,000 must be personally signed off by her.

“I eventually had to make a decision where I overrode DHS headquarters and sent the support anyhow,” Richardson said, referring to Texas. “I knew the magnitude of the problem when I started looking at the low end of $500 million a day we’re going to have to write contracts for. If I’m going to have to have everyone over $100,000 approved by headquarters, that’s just another layer of bureaucracy.”

In the book, Richardson paints the picture of Department of Homeland Security putting put “spies” at FEMA headquarters, to see what he was doing, and a secretary concerned with her appearance more than actually getting work done. 

Richardson recounts in the book one of his employees saying the memo would “kill” them during a disaster. A former Marine, Richardson said he viewed getting lifesaving support to Texas as essential, regardless of the cost.

“When a Marine or an Army ranger calls for support, they get what they need, regardless of the cost,” he said.  “That’s how I viewed getting support during hurricanes or as it came to be during the flash flood in Texas.”

In practice, the cost saving measures were well intentioned, he said, but “he downstream effects of that memo…were never really considered.” 

“I firmly believe that the 100K memo and the ramifications that it had was the beginning of the end for Secretary Noem,” he said.

Typically, FEMA administrators are on the ground immediately after a natural disaster strikes, but Richardson didn’t go to Texas immediately because he believed the “greatest point of friction” was in DC. 

“I was going to go to Texas once the check was cashed,” he said. “I wasn’t going to Texas and tell them the check is in the mail. I made sure it was cashed before I went there to see the people of Texas.”

Richardson also detailed in the book how he spent one night in Gettysburg, Pa. when the floods hit over July Fourth weekend, and raced back to D.C. the morning after. He took criticism during his testimony by House Democrats, but outlined in his book that he worked throughout the trip. 

In the book, he detailed the exercises FEMA ran to prepare for a disaster, including modeling what would happening during a Category 3 hurricane – which would cost hundreds of millions of dollars to respond to. 

Richardson told ABC News it was “not true” that FEMA withheld essential support from Texas, and that there were already FEMA teams on the ground to respond to the floods, including a FEMA team in Denton and utilizing the Coast Guard for search and rescue.

“The tragedy was, so many people died and the search and rescue teams had to get to Texas so they could recover the bodies,” he told ABC News.

Richardson said he realized that once his plan to reshape the agency wasn’t going to be considered and instead had to be worked through the FEMA review council, set up to recommend the future of the agency, he decided to resign. 

The FEMA Review Council’s recommendations, the body which advised the DHS of reducing the size of the agency in DC don’t go far enough he says, and in the book he argues FEMA should not be under DHS, but report directly to the president. 

“I realized OK, I’m just here for hurricane season,” he said. “And once hurricane season is over, I’m done because I don’t want to be in charge of a bloated Inefficient agency like FEMA that I can’t put on a diet.”

He called the agency “bloated, overweight and unhealthy,” and wanted to put FEMA “on a diet,” by reducing the number of employees at FEMA headquarters. 

Michael Coen, the former FEMA chief of staff in the Biden and Obama administrations told ABC News that FEMA is a critical organization that supports people on their worst days.

“FEMA’s structure has been built to align the necessary resources and staff to address the risks the nation may face,” he said in response to Richardson’s critiques of FEMA being a bloated agency. “The Agency is continuously improving and learning to meet the mission.”

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Kennedy Center board’s meeting to ‘exclusively’ focus on closure, court filing says

Judge blocks adding Trump tribute to Kennedy Center facade
Judge blocks adding Trump tribute to Kennedy Center facade
The Kennedy Center on Sept. 2, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Finn Gomez/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — Tuesday’s meeting of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts’ board will now focus exclusively on the “necessary closure” of the center, and not on additional ways to honor President Donald Trump, the Trump administration said in an overnight federal court filing.

In their late-night court filing, Justice Department lawyers included an email sent to the board at 7 p.m. Monday by Kennedy Center official Joe LaFauci, indicating that a separate draft resolution proposing ten new ways to honor Trump would not be considered, and that the board “stands by” its earlier vote to recognize the president.

LaFauci in his email said the update to Tuesday’s agenda was due “to the recently exacerbated structural emergencies” at the center, the court filing said.

Late on Monday night, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick separately posted security video of a partial ceiling collapse that occurred during a rainstorm earlier this month. The video shows a chunk of debris crashing onto an empty red carpet.

“If a performance had been underway, patrons could have been killed,” Lutnick said in his post on social media. “People cannot be allowed to go into this building any longer.”

The center voted in December to add Trump’s name on the outside of the building before a federal judge, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, ordered its removal in May.

The board voted 23-3 last month on a resolution to close the facility for two years as part of a $285 million renovation plan, according to a court filing. The board, members of which were largely appointed by Trump, also voted to add Trump’s name back onto the Kennedy Center building as many as two more times, according to the filing.

While Congress already appropriated $257 million for the project, the board has argued that Trump would raise another $100 million for the center.

The board as it voted last month said it would re-add Trump’s name to the building as the man who “renovated and restored” the center, adding, if a fundraising goal is hit, that it had been endowed by the “Trump Kennedy Center Fund.”

But Cooper is currently weighing whether that would violate a statute prohibiting additional memorials at D.C.’s only memorial to former President John F. Kennedy. Cooper is set to hold a 10 a.m. ET scheduling conference on the future plans for the center and the board is preparing to meet privately at 12:30 p.m. ET. 

Trustees are expected to vote on Tuesday afternoon on a measure declaring the Kennedy Center’s main building “unsafe for continued occupancy,” and ordering that it be “closed to patrons forthwith.”

Cooper is also positioned to eventually decide whether the board can move forward with its latest plans to close the center, plans that have taken on new urgency following the ceiling collapse and the new claim of center officials that the entity is quickly running out of money to remain operational. 

An attorney for Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio), who has filed a lawsuit challenging the planned closure and renaming, praised the decision not to move forward with another resolution honoring the president.

“Trump & cronies back down on HALF of the crazy,” lawyer Norm Eisen wrote on social media on Tuesday. But Eisen added that the plan to immediately close the center amounts to “foolishness” that he said Beatty’s legal team will fight.

Programming at the Kennedy Center, which normally funds its operations, effectively ended in early July. Ticket sales had reportedly been dropping off for months prior, following the board’s vote last December to rename the facility. Cooper ruled that move unlawful in May.

Despite Congress-approve funding that’s already on the table, center officials last weekend again underscored the need to honor Trump so that he might be enticed to lead additional efforts at raising money and oversee the renovation.  

“The Board understands that without such appropriate recognition it is unlikely that President Trump will provide the fundamental oversight of the renovation of the main building and lead the fiscal rescue of the Center,” read the text of a draft resolution that is — according to LaFauci — no longer up for consideration today. 

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Kash Patel testifies on FBI oversight before Senate committee

Kash Patel testifies on FBI oversight before Senate committee
Kash Patel testifies on FBI oversight before Senate committee
Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel testifies during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Sept. 15, 2026, in Washington, DC. The committee held the oversight hearing to examine the Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — FBI Director Kash Patel is testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday morning for an oversight hearing, the first time Patel is testifying since he clashed with lawmakers over reports of job performance issues more than four months ago.

The hearing comes after the committee’s top Democrat called on Patel to be replaced following a report published in The Atlantic in May that alleged Patel had “bouts of excessive drinking” and job performance issues.

Sen. Dick Durbin, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a statement that Patel lacks “the experience, judgment, and temperament to lead the FBI” and should be “replaced immediately.” Durbin reiterated those comments in his opening statements on Tuesday morning.

The report in The Atlantic was a focus of several lawmakers’ questions when Patel last testified on Capitol Hill in May with several heated exchanges over Patel’s drinking habits and job performance.

Patel said earlier this year that he’s “never been intoxicated on the job,” following the report. Patel sued The Atlantic over the article, demanding $250 million in damages.

During Tuesday’s hearing, Patel is expected to tout decreased crime nationwide, according to a source familiar with his testimony. President Donald Trump has frequently promoted a decrease in crime, saying on Friday that crime is “under control.”

The director will tout the increase in violent crime arrests, which are up 90%, arresting violent gang members are up 31% and he is expected to say it is the “most prolific run of crime reduction in history,” according to a source. 

The FBI says violent crime is down 9.3% from 2024 to 2025.

Patel is also expected to discuss the FBI’s efforts to thwart major terrorist incidents and highlight information sharing among law enforcement partners, according to a source familiar with his testimony.

He is expected to talk about how he has made the FBI more nimble as director, accelerating the reduction of bureaucracy of the agency.

Patel’s time at the helm of the FBI has been marked by several controversies, which lawmakers may question him about. Earlier this year, Patel joined in on Team USA hockey’s locker room celebrations in Italy shortly after the team won the gold medal, which drew scrutiny about his use of FBI resources to attend. He was also grilled during a House hearing late last year about his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Sen. Mitch McConnell returns to Senate floor after hospitalization

Sen. Mitch McConnell returns to Senate floor after hospitalization
Sen. Mitch McConnell returns to Senate floor after hospitalization
U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) arrives for a vote at the U.S. Capitol on September 14, 2026 in Washington, D.C. This is McConnell’s first public appearance in over 90 days after he recovered from a fall and illness. (Finn Gomez/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell returned to the Senate on Monday for the first time since being hospitalized in June following a fall.

“Today, I’ll cast my first Senate vote since I took a bad fall back in June,” McConnell said in a statement. “I’m really looking forward to being back on the Senate floor and seeing my colleagues.”

McConnell, who was in a wheelchair, briefly addressed journalists outside the Senate chamber this afternoon before heading to the floor to cast his first vote since June 11.

“After two years — two decades — of dodging your questions, I wasn’t sure how many of you would be here today,” McConnell joked at the outset. “So I am glad to see you. It is time to get back to work and finish the job for this Congress.” 

McConnell said he would be focused on the farm bill — which previously failed to advance out of committee due to McConnell’s absence. 

“As you know, I have an ongoing interest in NATO and backing up our good friends who are totally in the fight against the Russians,” he said.

McConnell said in his Monday statement that he was not yet fully recovered but that he would try to be present for critical votes.

“My recovery has been a long and often frustrating process, and the lingering effects of childhood polio haven’t made it any easier. I’m still not quite back to 100%, but I’ve assured Leader Thune that, as I continue with physical therapy on the advice of my doctors, I will do my best to be present for tough votes when our Conference needs me,” McConnell said.

McConnell was hospitalized on June 14 for reasons that were initially undisclosed in statements from his office. Subsequent statements from the senator revealed that he had suffered a fall that left him hospitalized. 

After weeks of inpatient rehabilitation treatment, McConnell announced in an Aug. 6 statement that he’d be continuing his recovery at home.

Before Monday, the senator had not been seen publicly since the June 14 fall. McConnell has missed six weeks of Senate business in Washington since his injury.

In statements issued during his recovery, the senator has said he’s keeping up with his work in the Senate.

“On the advice of my doctors, I’ll maintain an intensive regimen of physical therapy from home during the state work period, and I’ll continue to engage with my staff and colleagues on important Senate business,” McConnell said in an Aug. 6 statement.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Mayors and states sue Trump over new green card restrictions

Mayors and states sue Trump over new green card restrictions
Mayors and states sue Trump over new green card restrictions
Zohran Mamdani announces at a news conference that he is suing President Donald Trump’s administration over its policies that he says will drive immigrants and mixed-status families away from public benefits they can legally receive on Sept. 14, 2026, in New York City. The announcement at City Hall included local politicians and immigrant advocates. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

(NEW YORK) — New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and a coalition of Democratic-led cities and states across the country have filed a lawsuit challenging a new rule issued by the Trump administration that’s set to go into effect on Friday. The rule would give immigration officers wider discretion to deny green cards to some applicants.

Immigration officers would be able to deny green cards to people who are “likely at any time to become a public charge,” according to a policy notice published on the US. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) website.

The Trump administration announced the new rule in July.

Under current law, the government can deny a green card to those who become primarily dependent on government cash assistance or long-term medical care paid for by federal agencies. The Trump administration expanded the list to include non-cash, temporary programs like SNAP and WIC.

The government could now prevent someone from gaining permanent legal status if officials believe they’re likely at any point to require such programs.

Opponents say it could prevent U.S. citizens and their family members from obtaining certain benefits. For instance, federal officers could count a child’s participation in a school’s free lunch program against their parent’s application for citizenship.

“This is an undisguised effort to strip New Yorkers of the services they rely on,” Mamdani told reporters. “People could die.”

New York Attorney General Letitia James and 21 other states announced a separate lawsuit challenging the public charge rule.

In a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the cities and states argued the new rule will lead to an increase of homelessness, untreated illnesses, lack of access to education and food insecurity.

USCIS said certain groups would not be affected, such as asylum seekers, refugees, human trafficking victims and others.

At the press conference, James said she and others were filing the lawsuit because “New Yorkers should not have to choose between putting food on the table, getting the health care they need, and pursuing a future in this country.”

A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told ABC News, “Let’s get this straight, sanctuary states are terrified they will lose federal funds because hundreds of thousands of illegals and noncitizens might remove themselves from American welfare programs. We’re shaking in our boots over this supposedly terrible outcome.”

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle’s kids to change schools in UK over security concerns

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle’s kids to change schools in UK over security concerns
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle’s kids to change schools in UK over security concerns
Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, greet members of the public at the Cruising Yacht Club of Australia on April 17, 2026 in Sydney, Australia. (Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

(NEW YORK) — Prince Harry and Meghan’s two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, will move to a new school in the United Kingdom after leaving their previous school due to security concerns.

“The decision for the children to move school was taken following a discussion with the family’s security team about the practicalities of their current arrangements,” a spokesperson for Harry and Meghan said in a statement Monday.

“The parents remain extremely grateful to all the teachers and staff for the love, care and effort they have shown their family,” the spokesperson continued. “This decision should in no way be interpreted as a reflection on the school or the exceptional care the children have received there.”

Harry and Meghan and their two children moved to the U.K. in late August after living in California for six years.

It is not known publicly where the Sussexes are living in the U.K. nor where Archie and Lilibet had been enrolled in school. Many schools in the U.K. began their fall semesters the week of Sept. 7.

While living in the U.K., Harry and Meghan are remaining as “private citizens” and are not working royals, according to a letter released last week under the direction of Harry’s father, King Charles III.

As non-working royals, the Sussexes do not receive the same automatic taxpayer-funded armed police protection as Harry’s royal family members, including his father, the king, and his brother, Prince William.

The Sussexes have relied on a privately funded security team for the past six years since moving to California.

Harry and Meghan have not commented publicly on their security setup while living in the U.K.

ABC News understands that RAVEC, the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures — the independent body tasked with deciding who gets royal and VIP security in the U.K. — plans to review the security status for both Harry and Meghan as soon as possible.

RAVEC ruled in 2020 — when Harry and Meghan stepped away from their roles as senior working roles — that security for the Sussexes would be granted on a case-by-case basis.

Harry lost an appeal last year challenging the British government’s decision in 2020 to reduce his publicly funded security.

While Harry and Meghan have not commented publicly on their move back to the U.K., Meghan on Sunday shared a glimpse of the family’s new life there.

The duchess shared a video on Instagram showing herself walking hand-in-hand with Harry and other family moments, including Lilibet riding a bicycle with Archie running alongside her.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Russian oligarch paid for parts of Donald Trump Jr.’s wedding celebration, report says

Russian oligarch paid for parts of Donald Trump Jr.’s wedding celebration, report says
Russian oligarch paid for parts of Donald Trump Jr.’s wedding celebration, report says
Donald Trump Jr. and his wife Bettina Anderson disembark from Air Force One as they arrive alongside U.S. President Donald Trump at Dublin Airport, September 12, 2026 in Dublin, Ireland. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — A Russian oligarch with ties to President Vladimir Putin allegedly contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars for events around Donald Trump Jr.’s wedding to Bettina Anderson earlier this year, according to a report from ProPublica published Monday, with Anderson not disputing the “gift.”

The president’s son held his May wedding at an exclusive island in the Bahamas, with the oligarch — Umar Kremlev — footing a large portion of the bill for the events later that weekend, according to records reviewed by ProPublica, as well as three people familiar with the event who spoke with the outlet.

ABC News has not independently confirmed the details of the ProPublica report.

Kremlev covered expenses including renting out a private island and paying for a firework show, according to the ProPublica report. Payments for the expenses allegedly came from an entity affiliated with the controversial International Boxing Association — where Kremlev serves as president. 

When ABC News asked about the report, the White House and a spokesperson for Donald Trump Jr. pointed to a recent Instagram post from his new wife, Anderson, which does not dispute that Kremlev paid for part of the post-wedding celebrations, but stressed their wedding ceremony was attended “ONLY by our family.”

“Our dear friend Umar very generously hosted two incredible nights of celebrations for us AFTER our wedding. It was an extraordinarily generous wedding gift from a friend, and something for which we were and remain incredibly grateful,” Anderson wrote in her post.

“It’s unfortunate that something so personal and happy can be recast as something political or sinister simply because of who someone is or where they come from,” Anderson continued.

“So, for anyone determined not to let the facts get in the way of a good story: NO CONSPIRACY, NO MYSTERY,” said Anderson, who added that the weekend celebrations were initially planned to be a “fun weekend with friends,” but when plans “changed,” they decided to get married before the trip and celebrate as newlyweds.

In response to detailed questions from ProPublica, the outlet said that a spokesperson for Trump Jr. also did not dispute the payments from Kremlev.

“Umar is a personal friend of Don,” the spokesperson told ProPublica. 

It’s not clear why Kremlev paid for parts of Trump Jr.’s wedding celebration.

ProPublica reported that Kremlev had recently traveled to China as part of the delegation accompanying Putin, and that Putin had recently awarded him the state honor of the Order of Friendship.

The Russian government and Putin have led coordinated campaigns to interfere in U.S. elections in both 2016 and 2020, according to national security reports.

While Trump Jr. leads the Trump business empire with his brother, Eric Trump, he still has major influence inside his father’s political orbit — including pushing for his friend, JD Vance, to be named as Trump’s running mate for 2024.

The spokesperson told ProPublica that Kremlev is “not someone he has a business relationship with” and that the men met through a mutual friend in the hunting world and bonded over their love of boxing and the outdoors.Kremlev’s press office told ProPublica that “Mr. Kremlev and Mr. Trump Jr have a friendly relationship” and they first met “a couple of years ago.” ABC News has also reached out to Kremlev for comment.

The intimate guest list for the celebration made the presence of Kremlev, among a “large group” of other Russian guests, puzzling for attendees, according to ProPublica.

President Donald Trump notably did not attend Donald Trump Jr.’s wedding, posting on social media that “circumstances pertaining to Government, and my love for the United States of America” prevented him from joining the celebration in the Bahamas. He had also canceled his originally planned travel to his Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club and remained in Washington that weekend. 

The day prior, Trump said he was going to “try and make it” and noted that it was a “small, little private affair” — though he said the event is “not good timing” for him given his responsibilities surrounding the war in Iran.

“I said, ‘You know, this is not good timing for me. I have a thing called Iran and other things,'” Trump had said in the Oval Office in May.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.