Marianne Williamson defends leadership, pushes back on claim of ‘uncontrollable rage’

Marianne Williamson defends leadership, pushes back on claim of ‘uncontrollable rage’
Marianne Williamson defends leadership, pushes back on claim of ‘uncontrollable rage’
ABC News

(WASHINGTON) — Marianne Williamson, the Democratic presidential candidate, popular speaker and bestselling author of self-help books who is mounting a dark horse primary challenge to President Joe Biden, is returning to her campaign in earnest after a monthlong stay in England for the birth of her first grandchild.

“Now that I’m back, I’m going to be hitting the ground running,” Williamson told ABC News.

It’s a campaign trail that is markedly different. In that time, Williamson lost a second campaign manager, former President Donald Trump was indicted on federal charges that he denies, the president’s son Hunter reached a plea deal with prosecutors and six major candidates entered the Republican primary.

As Williamson reappears on the trail, with a slew of events scheduled in New Hampshire, Michigan, Massachusetts and Illinois, she addressed some of those topics in an interview with ABC News.

This month, Roza Calderón departed Williamson’s team as campaign manager just weeks after acting campaign manager Peter Daou left. It’s a shake-up that comes after some staffers on Williamson’s 2020 campaign detailed their experiences working with a candidate who allegedly exhibited “uncontrollable rage” and made staff cry, according to Politico.

“Somebody doesn’t like my blunt personality, my directness, then I’m sorry. Then, obviously, this wasn’t the right campaign for them,” Williamson said in response to these staffers’ accounts. “There are a lot of people who have worked for me who had nice things to say and with whom I get along very well.”

Williamson’s campaign argues the kinds of criticism she is facing usually only plagues other women. When ABC News asked Williamson what the fairest criticism of her is, she seemed to embrace her bluntness.

“Probably that I can be tough, but not tough like they say,” she said, adding, “I’m running for president after all. I think you need somebody who’s tough.”

However, the spiritual adviser said the reported comments attributed to her by former staff, and the top-level turnover plaguing her campaign, are not a reflection of her leadership abilities.

“We’ve got a good team,” she maintained. “And it takes time to get all that. Abraham Lincoln went through 12 generals to get to Ulysses S. Grant, and I don’t think anybody would say he wasn’t a good manager.”

Williamson faces an uphill battle against Biden, who has brushed off her calls for primary debates, something incumbent presidents have not participated in since the modern debate circuit began 75 years ago.

Biden continues to outpace her in polling by a yawning margin, according to FiveThirtyEight; and he is expected to easily lap her in the money race, too, having held eight big-dollar fundraisers this month, with two more planned in New York on Thursday. Notably, a lack of money troubled Williamson’s campaign in 2020, forcing her to lay off her entire staff before the first primary contest, as ABC affiliate WMUR reported at the time.

But she is holding out hope.

“American politics is very, very unpredictable,” she said.

Williamson said she’s not going to make the race personal. For her, that includes not weaponizing the agreement that Hunter Biden struck with prosecutors — still awaiting a judge’s approval — in which he would plead guilty to two misdemeanor tax charges and enter into a pretrial diversion program to avoid prosecution on a felony gun charge.

“I think what we need to remember is that Hunter Biden is not running for president,” Williamson said. “Hunter Biden is not his father and so Hunter Biden’s legal problems aren’t my business and they shouldn’t be yours.”

She later added that “it really has nothing to do with this race.”

Instead, Williamson said she will focus on Joe Biden’s job as president and what she criticizes as his administration’s “incremental approach” to addressing issues facing Americans, saying legislation the Biden campaign touts as victories — including the Inflation Reduction Act — don’t go far enough.

Williamson’s platform includes championing “fundamental economic reform,” universal health care, tuition-free college and free child care.

Biden’s reelection bid has received the backing of politicians whom Williamson herself aligns with, including Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Her 2024 campaign website states that Sanders was the only candidate in 2016 who acknowledged there was a “rigged” system and “wanted to do something about it.”

“If Sen. Sanders thinks that the incremental approach getting there that way is enough, I respect that that’s his opinion,” Williamson told ABC News. “But it’s not mine.”

Taking a swipe at a theme of Biden’s 2020 run and one he’s deploying once again in his reelection bid, Williamson said, “We’re not going to repair America until we help people repair their lives, and in order to do that you can’t just say we’re going to heal the soul of America.”

She wouldn’t assign a grade to Biden’s performance, though she said gives him an “A” for defeating Donald Trump in the 2020 election.

The prospect of a second Trump presidency is “really terrifying,” she said, in light of comments he made appearing to acknowledge and show off a sensitive military document after leaving office, according to an audio recording obtained by ABC News and other outlets.

She said she was “not shocked” by what Trump said, who has denied he had classified material in the interaction on the recording.

“What was, I think, most stunning about it is his lack of intellectual sobriety, you know, about something so important,” Williamson said. “These documents were about very, very serious military matters. And this man doesn’t even take seriously that democracy itself, the traditions of the presidency, or obviously the responsibilities of the president.”

Williamson also said she feels she should be taken more seriously. She resents her campaign being labeled a “long shot” by those, she said, seeking to delegitimatize her candidacy. She said she believes the biggest misconception of her is that she is a “crazy, crystal lady shrew.”

Williamson, who has never served in elected office, believes her lack of political experience is not an obstacle but rather an asset.

“The problem is not that we don’t have good political car mechanics in Washington,” she said, quoting a part of her pitch to voters. “The problem is that we are on the wrong road. And that’s what I know about.”

But asked if she would pick an elected official to be her vice presidential running mate, Williamson said, “Absolutely.”

“I think that would be a good idea, yes” she said. “Because we do need somebody in the room who knows those political mechanics.”

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Nearly 9,800 extra births occurred in Texas a year after the state’s 2021 abortion ban: Study

Nearly 9,800 extra births occurred in Texas a year after the state’s 2021 abortion ban: Study
Nearly 9,800 extra births occurred in Texas a year after the state’s 2021 abortion ban: Study
thianchai sitthikongsak/Getty Images

(HOUSTON) — Nearly 9,800 extra live births occurred in Texas the year after a strict abortion ban went into effect in 2021, a new analysis found.

In the study, published Thursday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), a team from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health looked at available data of live births from all 50 states and Washington, D.C. between 2016 and 2022.

Next, they used statistical modeling to estimate what birth counts in Texas would have looked like had S.B.8 — the law banning nearly all abortions after 6 weeks — not passed.

Researchers estimated 287,289 live births in Texas would have occurred from April 2022 to December 2022 had the abortion ban not gone into effect in September 2021. The actual number of births during this period was 297,088, meaning there were 9,799 more live births.

In 2021, Texas lawmakers passed, and Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law, S.B.8 , which bans abortion after six weeks gestation, before many women know they are pregnant.

S.B.8 also allows any private citizen to sue anyone who performs an abortion or assists a pregnant person in obtaining the procedure.

After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year, Texas had a trigger law go into effect in August 2022, banning abortion at nearly all stages, and making it a felony, punishable by up to life in prison, with an exception to save the life of a pregnant person.

“There just are a lot of questions around what’s going to happen to actual fertility, whether people are going to be able to get an abortion or not,” co-lead author Alison Gemmill, an assistant professor in the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, told ABC News.

Gemmill said the findings highlight how thousands of people may not have had a choice but to continue an unwanted or unsafe pregnancy due to the ban, and there may be even more who can’t after the Supreme Court decision, known as Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

“At the time that this Texas ban was passed, people could still go out of state to the neighboring states,” Gemmill said. “But since Dobbs, we know that all of those neighboring states have also banned abortion and so there’s the question of whether that impact is going to be larger now that you have fewer states where people can access abortion.”

Although studies have shown there was an increase in abortions provided to Texans in other states, the team said the findings of its analysis suggest not everyone who might have wanted an abortion was able to get one after S.B.8. passed.

This is not the first study to examine the effects of Texas’s abortion ban. A 2022 study found abortions in or around Texas fell by 38% the month after the ban went into effect.

Gemmill said the analysis did not go into the effects of being denied access to abortion, but research has shown it can have a serious impact on physical and mental health.

“Even though we’re not directly measuring the negative consequences of the study, we know from other studies … that people who are denied wanted abortions face a host of negative consequences,” she said. “We need to contextualize what these births mean. It’s nuanced.”

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Ukrainian soldiers say they owe lives to US-supplied Bradley vehicles

Ukrainian soldiers say they owe lives to US-supplied Bradley vehicles
Ukrainian soldiers say they owe lives to US-supplied Bradley vehicles
Artur Widak/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

(KYIV, Ukraine) — As Ukrainian forces continue their counteroffensive against Russia, some soldiers say an American-supplied vehicle is making a key difference in their advances, and more importantly, saving lives.

The U.S. has provided has provided Ukrainian forces with Bradley Fighting Vehicles as part of aid packages since the beginning of the year and they have been heavily used in the counteroffensive Ukraine that launched in early June.

Two Ukrainian soldiers from the 47th brigade, Serhiy and Andriy, told ABC News that they and their crew wouldn’t be alive today if Bradley didn’t protect them from a battle early on in the counteroffensive where they were struck by mines, high caliber guns and attack drones.

“We were hit multiple times,” Andriy, who drove one Bradley, said. “Thanks to it, I am standing here now. If we were using some Soviet armored personnel carrier we would all probably be dead after the first hit. It’s a perfect vehicle.”

The Bradleys are armed with a 25mm automatic cannon, a 7.62mm machine gun, and a TOW missile system that can hit armored targets more than two miles away.

Andriy and Serhiy’s brigade was part of one of the first major assaults using significant amounts of Western-supplied armored, launched against heavily fortified Russian lines in the Zaporizhzhia region in southern Ukraine at the start of June.

As they advanced towards the Russian positions, protected by dense minefields, the Ukrainian troops came almost immediately under heavy fire. The vehicle behind Andriy was struck by an attack drone, killing his unit’s commander.

Andriy’s Bradley was then hit first by a 120mm mortar. Two 150mm shells then struck both sides of the vehicle, he told ABC.

“Almost all of my guys were concussed, and they were really disoriented,” he said. But the squad inside bailed out and managed to safely escape back to cover.

Russia’s defense ministry released a widely video of a nearby area showing four Bradleys and one German Leopard 2A6 tanks damaged and abandoned after a different failed breaching assault by the 47th Brigade

Serhiy, who drove a Bradley during yet another nearby assault, said Russian forces were very well prepared. Despite his vehicle also being badly hit, he said he and his team escaped major injuries while inside during the attack.

“It’s a very good car if you are inside. I’ve checked on myself and on my team. Only one guy had a concussion,” he said.

Ukraine has so far lost at least 24 Bradleys, according to the Oryx open source website, that tracks Ukrainian and Russia equipment losses by visually confirming them in public available imagery.

Serhiy and Andriy said the Ukrainians were often able to recover many of the vehicles disabled in the attacks. One of their vehicles was recovered and used for parts that allowed the repair of two more Bradleys, they said.

Andriy was hospitalised for concussion, but a day later snuck out against his doctors advice, determined to recover his vehicle. He returned to the battlefield where the Bradley was still abandoned and discovering its engine was still functioning succeeded in driving it out.

He said, despite the difficulties in advancing he believed Ukraine’s counteroffensive would be successful.

“I think in the near future we will succeed,” he said.

“We’ll find their weak spot,” Serhiy said.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Man with Jan. 6 warrant arrested near Obama DC home

Man with Jan. 6 warrant arrested near Obama DC home
Man with Jan. 6 warrant arrested near Obama DC home
krisanapong detraphiphat/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — A man with a Jan. 6-related warrant was arrested near former President Barack Obama’s Washington, D.C., house, and he had guns and ammunition in his car, multiple law enforcement sources tell ABC News.

Taylor Taranto, 37, was arrested by the Metropolitan Police Department and charged with Fugitive from Justice, pursuant to an arrest warrant, according to a statement from the agency. The officials did not specify what the warrant was for.

Law enforcement sources told ABC News that they were concerned he was coming to the area and had a Be On the Lookout, or BOLO, order out for his arrest. He was livestreaming just before he was arrested at 1 p.m. Thursday afternoon, according to sources.

Authorities who searched his car found multiple firearms, ammunition and material to make at least one Molotov cocktail, according to law enforcement sources.

Taranto wasn’t in the protective bubble of the former president and had not gotten past any checkpoints, law enforcement sources stressed.

Taranto didn’t make any direct threats to the former president or mention him by name, but he did suggest he had weapons in his comments on his livestream, according to law enforcement sources.

There is no active threat to the community, and the incident remains under investigation, according to MPD’s statement.

The story was first reported by CBS News.

Taranto is a defendant named in a civil lawsuit brought by the widow of MPD officer Jeffrey Smith, who died by suicide following the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol.

The complaint, brought by Smith’s widow in August 2021, identified Taranto as having entered the Capitol and alleged that he aided another rioter, David Walls-Kaufman, in attacking Smith as he was trying to remove rioters from the building.

Walls-Kaufman pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor offense after federal prosecutors acknowledged they couldn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had assaulted Smith, and he was sentenced to two months in jail earlier this month.

It is not clear why Taranto has not been charged. He has claimed in the civil court proceedings, however, that he was in the mob acting as an “established 1st amendment press agent” that covers Antifa and Black Lives Matter “provocateurs.”

He has otherwise denied aiding in Smith’s assault. The civil lawsuit remains active after being assigned to a new judge in February.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Biden slams SCOTUS affirmative action decision: ‘Discrimination still exists in America’

Biden slams SCOTUS affirmative action decision: ‘Discrimination still exists in America’
Biden slams SCOTUS affirmative action decision: ‘Discrimination still exists in America’
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — President Joe Biden on Thursday blasted the Supreme Court ruling setting new limits on affirmative action as a “severe disappointment,” saying, “we cannot let this decision be the last word.”

“The court has effectively ended affirmative action in college admissions and I strongly, strongly disagree with the court’s decision,” Biden said, adding that “the court has once again walked away from decades of precedent.”

Saying “affirmative action is so misunderstood,” Biden said, “I believe our colleges are stronger when they are racially diverse. Our nation is stronger because we use — but because we are tapping into the full range of talent in this nation. I also believe that while talent, creativity and hard work are everywhere across this country, not equal opportunity, it is not everywhere across this country,” he said.

“We cannot let decision be the last word. I want to emphasize we cannot let this decision be the last word. While the court can render a decision, it cannot change what America stands for, ” he said.

“The truth is, we all know it, discrimination still exists in America,” he said. “Discrimination still exists in America. Discrimination still exists in America,” he repeated. “Today’s decision doesn’t change that. We cannot let the decision be a permanent setback for the country.”

Saying the nation needed “a path forward,” he proposed a new standard for colleges and universities, cautioning, “they should not abandon, let me say this again, they should abandon their commitment to ensure student bodies of diverse backgrounds and experience that reflect all of America.”

“What I propose for consideration is a new standard where colleges take into account the adversity a student has overcome when selecting among qualified applicants,” he said.

He said he was “directing the Department of Education to analyze what practices help build a more inclusive and diverse student bodies and what practices hold that back, practices like legacy admissions and other systems that — expand privilege instead of opportunity.”

As he left, when asked by a reporter whether this was a “rogue court,” Biden replied, “this is not a normal court.”

Later Thursday, after traveling to New York for fundraisers, in a rare live interview on MSNBC’s “Deadline: White House,” he explained his comment to anchor Nicole Wallace.

“It’s done more to unravel basic rights and basic decisions than any court in … recent history,” Biden said. “And that’s what I meant by ‘not normal.'”

He pointed not just to the court’s decision on affirmative action ruling but to its decision to overrule Roe v. Wade.

“Take a look at how it’s — how it’s ruled on a number of issues that are — have been precedent for 50, 60 years sometimes,” Biden said, “and that’s what I meant by ‘not normal.'”

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

At least 13 dead in Texas as scorching temps continue

At least 13 dead in Texas as scorching temps continue
At least 13 dead in Texas as scorching temps continue
Brandon Bell/Getty Images

(HOUSTON) — At least 13 people have died from heat-related illness in Texas, The Associated Press reported.

Ten deaths due to heat illness were reported in Webb County and another death occurred in Galveston County in the past two weeks, local officials told ABC News, as the Southern U.S. grapples with a weeks-long heat wave and triple-digit temperatures.

Emergency room visits in Texas between June 18 and June 24 have spiked compared to the same time last year as the state battles an early onset of extreme heat, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The region averaged 837 heat-related visits per 100,000 ER visits compared to 639 visits per 100,000 emergency department visits during the same period in 2022, CDC data shows.

Much of the South is experiencing waves of extreme heat far earlier in the season than normal. This has been particularly true of Texas, where temperatures have regularly exceeded 100 degrees for several weeks.

On Wednesday, temperatures in Texas reached 107 degrees in Corpus Christi, 108 degrees in Austin and 109 degrees in Houston.

On Monday, Laredo and San Angelo tied their all-time recorded hottest temperatures at 115 degrees and 111 degrees, respectively.

This level of heat in Texas isn’t considered novel but it typically isn’t seen until July and August. When Houston exceeded the 100-degree mark on Wednesday for the first time this season, it did so a full month earlier than it usually does, records show.

The death toll is likely to rise as the scorching temperatures continue, officials said.

Across the country, heat indexes are measuring in the triple digits, with states including New Mexico and Oklahoma all under heat alerts on Thursday.

Human-caused climate change is making near-record heat in parts of Texas at least five times more likely, according to an analysis by the nonprofit climate change research organization Climate Central.

Heat is the number-one weather-related killer in the world, with more than 600 people dying from heat-related illnesses every year in the U.S., according to the CDC.

The U.S. could soon be paying an additional $1 billion in healthcare expenses each summer due to forecasts of continuing waves of extreme heat in the near future, according to a new report by Virginia Commonwealth University and the think tank Center for American Progress.

An increase in prolonged periods of high heat has coincided with the increase in heat-related illness, the report found.

If greenhouse gas emissions are not reduced, Americans could experience on average up to 53 days every year in which temperatures exceed 95 degrees, according to a report by the consulting firm ICF International.

ABC News’ Gina Sunseri, Flor Tolentino, Jennifer Watts and Tracy Wholf contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Sarah McBride could be 1st openly trans person in Congress, but her focus is on results for Delaware

Sarah McBride could be 1st openly trans person in Congress, but her focus is on results for Delaware
Sarah McBride could be 1st openly trans person in Congress, but her focus is on results for Delaware
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images for Tribeca Film Festival

(DOVER, Del.) — Sarah McBride is used to being first. She was the first openly transgender person to work in the White House, the first to speak at the Democratic National Convention and the first to become a state senator, in Delaware.

If the campaign she announced on Monday is successful, she will be the first transgender person to serve in Congress — representing Delaware’s sole congressional district — and the first openly transgender person to be elected at the federal level.

Because Delaware’s at-large district is solidly Democratic, competition in the race will likely play out during the primary next fall. The seat is currently held by Rep. Lisa Blunt Rochester, who announced last week that she is running for the U.S. Senate to fill the seat held by retiring Tom Carper.

McBride, 32, enters the race with endorsements from high-ranking Delaware lawmakers, support from LGBTQ advocacy groups and relationships with the Biden family. President Joe Biden wrote the foreword to her 2018 memoir, and she has called his late son, Beau, one of her mentors.

“I’m incredibly confident and optimistic going into this campaign that we will win in September of 2024 [during the primary] and then win in November of 2024,” McBride said. “I believe that Delaware is ready. We’ve shown that small states can do big things, and it’s time for us to do that again.”

On the day she launched her campaign, she told ABC News that she has been happy to answer questions about her trans identity. But, she said with a smile, gender is not at the core of her job description as an elected official and she didn’t seek office to be “the trans senator.”

“My day-to-day focus is not explaining gender identity to people,” she said. “My day-to-day focus is delivering tangible results for the constituents that I serve.”

McBride is aware that trans candidates face increased scrutiny of their electability at the same time that the number of trans officeholders is growing, she said. She’s also running at a time of rising anti-LGBTQ extremism across the U.S., according to recent assessments from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, the Anti-Defamation League and GLAAD.

Conservative lawmakers have backed a wave of trans-related restrictions across the country, particularly around gender-affirming care for minors, which many Republicans say is inappropriate.

McBride sees in these trends a theme that cuts across civil rights movements in the U.S., she said: the “dual story of progress and pain.”

“This is absolutely a difficult moment for many in our country, including trans people,” she said. “But as has been the case before, we can turn that pain into progress as long as we summon the hope necessary to see this fight through.”

Electoral window widens for trans candidates

When she became a state senator in 2021, McBride joined the so-called “rainbow wave” of LGBTQ public officials who have taken office in recent years. There are currently 57 sitting U.S. elected officials who are openly transgender or nonbinary, up from 25 in 2019, according to the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, an advocacy group.

Albert Fujii, a spokesperson for the Victory Fund, believes that as LGBTQ issues have become more and more mainstream, a candidate’s queer identity can be an asset. He pointed to the increasing number of trans and nonbinary elected officials as evidence that voters in blue and purple districts believe these candidates bring an important perspective to the table.

“Being LGBTQ+ is a strength,” Fujii said. “Not only are they running in record numbers, but they’re also winning in record numbers.”

Polling appears to back this up. About eight in 10 Americans say they are willing to vote for a well-qualified gay or lesbian candidate, up from 55% in 2007, Gallup polling in 2020 found.

But favorability varies widely across partisan lines, with Democrats significantly more likely to support the social acceptance of transgender people, according to Pew Research Center data from 2021.

In McBride’s ideal world, her candidacy — and other identity “firsts” — wouldn’t be historic.

“Ultimately, we should have a world where it’s not noteworthy that a person of any particular identity is able to fully participate in our democracy, including running for office and winning,” she said.

McBride’s vision of progress

“I think of myself as a Delawarean. I think of myself as a doer. I think of myself as someone who believes very deeply that we have to make government work better for people, both because they need it and also because it’s the only way to save our democracy,” she said.

She also mentioned her role as a caregiver in her personal life, telling ABC News that she helped care for her late husband, Andy Cray, who died in 2014 from cancer.

“And yes, I think of myself as a trans person. But that is just one aspect of who I am,” she said.

McBride expects her record on the issues is what would get her elected. Although there is more than a year until her primary, she has emerged as a strong contender in the race with a series of high-profile endorsements, including from state Attorney General Kathy Jennings and in the Delaware Legislature — from state Senate Majority Leader Bryan Townsend and 11 of her 14 Democratic colleagues.

She is also backed by the Human Rights Campaign, where she previously worked as national press secretary, the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund and the Equality political action committee.

Another candidate, Alexander Geise, has filed paperwork to run against McBride in the Democratic primary. So far, no Republicans have announced a bid for the seat.

While McBride avoids questions about specific political labels within the Democratic Party, her time in office indicates progressive bona fides. She played a leading role in passing laws for statewide family and medical leave and to ban housing discrimination for trans people.

She has named a host of progressive priorities on the campaign trail — including on health care, climate change and gun restrictions — and though she did not directly respond to questions about proposals like Medicare for All or a “Green New Deal” to address the warming climate, she said: “I will support any measure that expands access to health care. And I support any measure that’s going to reduce the threat of climate change in our society.”

“Voters are judging candidates based on their ideas and not their identities,” she said. “And I think it fundamentally undersells and undervalues Delaware voters to think that they care more about my gender than they do who’s going to deliver for them.”

ABC News’ Sherby Perez contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Grand jury declines to indict Travis Scott, 5 others in deadly Astroworld crowd crush

Grand jury declines to indict Travis Scott, 5 others in deadly Astroworld crowd crush
Grand jury declines to indict Travis Scott, 5 others in deadly Astroworld crowd crush
Laurent KOFFEL/Gamma-Rapho via Getty Images

(HOUSTON) — A grand jury has declined to indict rapper Travis Scott and five others in connection with the deadly crowd crush at the 2021 Astroworld Festival in Houston, prosecutors said.

Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg said the grand jury on Thursday returned no bills on all criminal charges related to the deaths of the 10 spectators.

“The grand jury found that no crime did occur, that no single individual was criminally responsible,” Ogg said during a press briefing.

Ten people died, including a 9-year-old boy, after the crowd rushed toward the stage during headline and festival founder Travis Scott’s set. Thousands were injured, according to attorneys representing people suing Scott, promoter Live Nation and dozens of other companies.

According to Houston Police and witness accounts, a wave of tens of thousands of people moved toward the stage when Scott — and later rapper Drake — appeared. Concert attendees said they were pushed into one another from all sides. As the crowd pressed its way forward, some began to fall, pass out and get trampled by others in the audience. The 10 victims died from compression asphyxia and were located in the same general area, police said.

“One of the key contributing factors to the deaths was the overpopulation and resulting compaction in this quadrant,” Houston Detective Michael Barrow told reporters during the press briefing. “This was not a crowd stampede, this was not a stage rush, this was not a crowd surge. This was a slow compaction or constriction into this quadrant, resulting in collapses within the crowd.”

Houston Police Chief Troy Finner said police completed their criminal investigation into the incident last week, calling it a “very complex investigation.” The investigation will be publicly released, he said.

In addition to Scott, the grand jury weighed whether any criminal charges should be filed against festival manager Brent Silberstein; John Junell, with Live Nation; Shawna Boardman and Seyth Boardman, with crowd management company Contemporary Services Corporation; and Emily Ockenden with production company BWG, according to court documents.

Alycia Harvey, a prosecutor with the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, said possible charges under consideration were limited to crimes that can be committed by omission, such as child endangerment. Charges of manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide would have needed an “act of causation” to be sustained in front of the grand jury, she said.

An attorney for Scott called the 19-month investigation “one of the most exhaustive investigations in the history of the Houston Police Department” in remarks to reporters Thursday.

The case has “had a huge impact” on Scott’s career, the attorney, Kent Schaffer, said, including lost sponsorships and endorsements.

“As long as there was a pending criminal investigation, it makes it extremely difficult to get insured,” Schaffer said. “Now he’s going to be able to pick back up where he left off, which is great because, you know, in this country everybody’s presumed innocent.”

Following the concert, Scott released a statement on Twitter, saying, “I’m absolutely devastated by what took place last night. My prayers go out to the families and all those impacted by what happened at Astroworld festival.”

In an extensive interview with radio host Charlamagne Tha God in December 2021, the rapper said he was unaware of the injuries and fatalities among fans until after his performance was over.

When asked at the time if he feels responsible for the tragedy, Scott said, “I have a responsibility to figure out what happened here. I have a responsibility to figure out the solution.”

In a statement to ABC News in the days after the concert, Live Nation said it was working with law enforcement to get answers.

“We continue to support and assist local authorities in their ongoing investigation so that both the fans who attended and their families can get the answers they want and deserve, and we will address all legal matters at the appropriate time,” Live Nation said.

Scott and event organizers have been hit with litigation in the wake of the tragedy.

Hundreds of lawsuits filed against the event organizers, managers and performers were consolidated and are being handled by one judge.

A case brought by the family of Axel Acosta, a 21-year-old who was killed in the crush, settled last year under undisclosed terms.

The family of Ezra Blount, the 9-year-old killed, have also sued Scott and other event organizers.

The attorney for his family, Robert C. Hilliard, said in a statement Thursday that “criminal and civil accountability are critical to be sure that those responsible for the loss of innocent lives are made to not only understand the permanent devastation they caused these families — but to show the rule of law applies to the powerful, to the well connected.”

The grand jury’s decision “has no impact on the many civil lawsuits pending,” Ogg said.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Judge denies Trump’s request to dismiss E. Jean Carroll’s remaining defamation claim

Judge denies Trump’s request to dismiss E. Jean Carroll’s remaining defamation claim
Judge denies Trump’s request to dismiss E. Jean Carroll’s remaining defamation claim
Scott Eisen/Getty Images

(NEW YORK) — A federal judge in New York on Thursday denied former President Donald Trump’s request to dismiss E. Jean Carroll’s original defamation claim against him, ruling his arguments lacked merit.

Carroll, a former Elle magazine columnist, sued Trump in November 2019 over comments he made shortly after Carroll publicly accused him of raping her in a Manhattan department store dressing room in the 1990s. In those statements Trump denied the accusation, said Carroll was “not my type,” and suggested she fabricated her accusation for ulterior and improper purposes, including to increase sales of her then-forthcoming book.

“Regarding the ‘story’ by E. Jean Carroll, claiming she once encountered me at Bergdorf Goodman 23 years ago. I’ve never met this person in my life. She is trying to sell a new book — that should indicate her motivation. It should be sold in the fiction section,” Trump posted on Twitter.

Trump argued the case should be dismissed because he is immune from her claim since he was president at the time.

“His theory fails for two reasons,” Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote Thursday. “First, absolute presidential immunity is not the only type of absolute immunity that raises separation of powers concerns. Second, and more importantly, ‘separation of powers’ is not a magic phrase that automatically transforms any issue it touches into an impediment to the exercise of subject matter jurisdiction.”

Kaplan also rejected Trump’s claim that his denials were part of his official duties as president.

“Mr. Trump did not merely deny Ms. Carroll’s accusation of sexual assault. Instead, he accused Ms. Carroll of lying about him sexually assaulting her in order to increase sales of her book, gain publicity, and/or carry out a political agenda,” Kaplan wrote. “Even assuming that the president’s decision publicly to deny an accusation of personal wrongdoing comes within the outer perimeter of his official duties, it does not follow that the president’s own personal attacks on his or her accuser equally fall within that boundary.”

The civil trial is scheduled for January.

In May, Carroll prevailed in a second lawsuit that alleged defamation and battery. A jury found Trump liable for both and awarded Carroll $5 million in damages.

In a separate filing Thursday, Trump’s attorneys argued he deserved either a new trial or a downward modification of the damage payment.

“Consequently, the Jury’s $2 million award was clearly motivated by sympathy rather than by evidence of harm, and the Court should grant a new trial as to compensatory damages for the battery claim, or grant a remittitur of such award to an amount no more than $400,000,” defense attorney Joe Tacopina wrote.

Trump has also filed a defamation suit against Carroll for continuing to accuse him of rape after the jury in May ruled that he was liable for sexually assaulting her but not raping her as she claimed.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Former Parkland school cop Scot Peterson, who allegedly fled shooting, found not guilty on all counts

Former Parkland school cop Scot Peterson, who allegedly fled shooting, found not guilty on all counts
Former Parkland school cop Scot Peterson, who allegedly fled shooting, found not guilty on all counts
Amy Beth Bennett/South Florida Sun Sentinel/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

(PARKLAND, Fla.) — The former Parkland, Florida, resource officer accused of failing to confront the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooter who killed 14 students and three staff members in 2018 has been found not guilty on all counts.

Scot Peterson, 60, was charged in 2019 with multiple counts of child neglect after an internal investigation found that he retreated while students were under attack. Prosecutors accused Peterson, a 30-year veteran of the Broward Sheriff’s Office, of making a false statement, claiming that he did not hear gunshots.

Peterson could be seen sobbing with his head on the table after the verdicts were read by the judge.

Peterson, who was fired after the probe report was released, had pleaded not guilty.

After the verdict, Peterson told reporters the only one person to blame for the tragedy was “that monster,” referring to the gunman.

“In any type of incident, do your due diligence and look at the facts,” Peterson said.

Kristen Gomes, an assistant state attorney at the Broward County State Attorney’s Office, said during closing arguments that Peterson didn’t do anything to search for the shooter and confront him.

“When the defendant ran, he left behind an unrestricted killer who spent the next four minutes and 15 seconds wandering the halls at his leisure. Because when Scot Peterson ran, he left them in a building with a predator unchecked,” she said.

Mark Eiglarsh, Peterson’s attorney, argued that his client was being made a “sacrificial lamb.” Eiglarsh said in closing arguments that Peterson couldn’t accurately detect where the gunshots came from and neither could several other students and teachers.

“He did everything he could,” Eiglarsh told reporters after the verdict.

Peterson faced up to 95 years in state prison and the loss of his pension if convicted on all charges.

When asked if Peterson was considering a civil case against the police, Eiglarsh declined to answer.

“We’ll look into everything after the fact,” he said.

Linda Beigel Schulman,, the mother of slain Parkland teacher Scott Beigel, slammed Peterson for telling reporters that he got his life back following the verdict.

“Well bravo for getting your life back, I cannot get my son’s life back,” she told ABC News Live.

Beigel Schulman said that even though the jury found Peterson not legally responsible for the deaths, she found him morally responsible for her son’s killing.

Peterson told reporters that he was open to talking to the victim’s family members, but Beigel Schulman said that was one offer she wouldn’t accept.

“I am not going to speak to him and absolve him of his moral guilt,” she said. “No way.”

The gunman, Nikolas Cruz, a former student at the high school, was sentenced to life in prison last year after pleading guilty to 17 counts of first-degree murder and 17 counts of attempted first-degree murder.

ABC News’ Meredith Deliso contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.