Some banned media organizations return to the White House after judge’s order

Some banned media organizations return to the White House after judge’s order
Some banned media organizations return to the White House after judge’s order
Signs of support for AP, CNN, MS NOW and POLITICO hang on the White House grounds on September 21, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Finn Gomez/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — Reporters and producers from news organizations that President Donald Trump barred from the White House were back on the grounds after a federal judge granted a temporary restraining order to restore their passes.

Earlier Thursday, the lawyer for media organizations requested an emergency hearing as early as Thursday, telling a federal judge that the government has “already repeatedly” violated his temporary restraining order after the three news organizations were denied entry into the White House earlier in the day.

“Defendants have already repeatedly violated the Court’s Order. Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court set a hearing by videoconference or teleconference as soon as possible this morning,” Ted Boutrous wrote. 

Judge Timothy Kelly ordered the government to respond to the plaintiffs’ notice of non-compliance by 12:30 p.m. ET Thursday.

In a declaration submitted by the White House in response to Kelly’s order, officials said that access had been restored as of 9:55 a.m. ET.

Around noon on Thursday, the outlets reported that they were beginning to be granted access to the White House grounds.

CNN reporter Betsy Klein, who had her hard pass taken on Saturday, and others, walked through a White House gate shortly after noon after her hard pass was given back to her. MSNOW correspondent Laura Barrón-López was also back on the campus Thursday afternoon.

Politico reported one of its reporters had also been granted access. 

Earlier Thursday, Kelly granted CNN, Politico and MS NOW a temporary restraining order requiring the White House to restore the outlets’ hard-pass press credentials.

The order requires the defendants, excluding President Donald Trump, as well as their agents and representatives, to “immediately return, reinstate, and restore” the White House hard-pass press credentials held by employees of CNN, MS NOW and Politico.

Kelly granted the media organizations’ request in the ongoing case Cable News Networks, Inc. v. Trump after their credentials were revoked on Sept. 18, according to the court order.

Kelly expressed skepticism about the Trump administration’s argument that the stories it cited as justification for revoking the outlets’ press credentials raised national security concerns.

Kelly described the stories identified by the administration as “routine” and said he was “skeptical” that the government’s stated interest in safeguarding national security was the actual motivation for revoking the hard passes. He also noted that Trump did not mention national security concerns when he announced the ban.

“Nothing in the record that predates this suit suggests that the revocation of Plaintiffs’ hard passes was motivated by national security concerns,” Kelly said in the filing. “Certainly, that is not what President Trump said when he announced that he was “banning” Plaintiffs from the White House — instead, he focused on the alleged lack of truthfulness and negativity of Plaintiffs’ reporting.”

In a hearing on Wednesday, Kelly signaled that he believes the White House failed to follow the process established by earlier court cases to terminate a reporter’s credential. 

“I think it is fair to say that the process that the court laid out in those two cases – the circuit laid out in those two cases – wasn’t followed here,” he said. 

Boutrous focused on that due process argument near the end of the hearing, telling the court that the White House’s “Alice in Wonderland process” for terminating the credentials is “arbitrary” and “irrational.” 

“It’s not due process when there’s been a prejudgment of the issue. Clearly, that’s happened,” Boutrous said. “They’re going to keep playing games, moving the ball. That’s not due process.” 

Justice Department lawyer Michael Velchik argued that the notice the White House provided in letters sent after 10 p.m. Tuesday night, days after the ban took effect, was enough. He also suggested the outlets’ responses might convince Trump to change his mind about the ban.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Dr. Heidi Overton appears before Senate committee for confirmation hearing as next FDA commissioner

Dr. Heidi Overton appears before Senate committee for confirmation hearing as next FDA commissioner
Dr. Heidi Overton appears before Senate committee for confirmation hearing as next FDA commissioner
Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy Dr. Heidi Overton speaks in the Oval Office on Aug. 10, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — Dr. Heidi Overton is appearing before a Senate committee on Thursday for her confirmation hearing as the next commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration.

Overton was nominated in August by President Donald Trump, who described her in a post on social media as a “ROCKSTAR in my Administration.”

She is sitting before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) committee, where she is likely to face questions about childhood vaccines and the abortion drug mifepristone.

If confirmed, Overton will be the second person to lead the FDA after the previous commissioner, Marty Makary, resigned following public clashes with lawmakers, major pharmaceutical companies and Trump over fruit-flavored vapes.

Kyle Diamantas has served as acting FDA commissioner since May 2026.

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., chair of the HELP committee, began the hearing by asking Overton if the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine Is lethal. Overton replied it is not.

When asked if the vaccine is safe and effective, Overton reiterated that the vaccine is safe and effective against measles.

“Are there any vaccines on the U.S. market right now which are unsafe?” Cassidy asked.

“Senator, every vaccine on the U.S. market right now is safe and effective, according to the FDA,” Overton said.

Cassidy attempted to press Overton on whether she disagreed with the president on the safety and efficacy of the MMR vaccine, but Overton deflected from answering directly.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wa., asked Overton if she believes mifepristone is safe and effective. Kennedy launched an FDA safety review of the drug last year.

“I know that it has met the safety and efficacy standard according to the FDA review,” Overton replied.

Murray expressed concern over an article she said Overton published three years ago, which she said described medication abortion as dangerous to women.

She also asked if Overton believed an IUD is an abortifacient, which is a substance used to induce an abortion or terminate a pregnancy. Overton did not answer directly.

“If I’m confirmed as FDA commissioner, I’ll be fully briefed on all their prior decisions and make determinations according to the standards of safety and efficacy,” Overton said.

She has espoused anti-abortion views and supported reductions to the childhood immunization schedule. At the executive order signing, she touted the use of what she called “gold-standard science” and restoring vaccination authority to parents.

Overton was nominated for the job, in part, because she is a loyalist of the president, two sources familiar with the nomination tell ABC News.

She’s been described as a loyal staffer, particularly in the presidents’ efforts to overhaul the childhood vaccine schedule, according to a former senior administration official.

“Why would you not want your own loyalist in there?” the source said about Trump’s choice, adding “She [Overton] kind of goes along with things.” The former official supports Overton but has previously acknowledged that, “She’s been in the world of politics for a long time and understands everything’s about loyalty.”

Overton is a physician with a doctor of medicine degree from the University of New Mexico and also holds a doctorate from Johns Hopkins University.

Prior to her role as deputy assistant to the president for domestic policy, she was vice chair of the America First Policy Institute’s (AFPI) Center for a Healthy America, where Overton was also the chief policy officer, a nonprofit that aims to advance policies that it says put the American people first. AFPI was run by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins before Rollins was tapped to join the president’s Cabinet.

Several Trump administration officials held positions there before he was reelected, including Education Secretary Linda McMahon.

Prior to the hearing, Cassidy expressed “strong concerns” about Overton’s nomination because of her participation in the White House executive order overhauling the childhood vaccine schedule.

“That alone is almost disqualifying,” Cassidy wrote in a post on X.

Cassidy, a physician and liver doctor, has long championed the efficacy of vaccines and has grilled Trump’s health officials on their willingness to stand up to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., including recently installed director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Dr. Erica Schwartz.

In a statement to ABC News, Democratic Women’s Caucus Chairwoman Teresa Leger Fernández slammed the nomination.

“I call on my colleagues in the Senate to reject her nomination,” Fernández wrote, adding “Overton has publicly denied scientific fact and repeatedly launched conspiratorial attacks against our right to abortion access, the safety of mifepristone, and Planned Parenthood.”

Fernández added: “She is not qualified to serve as FDA Commissioner, and her extremist beliefs and loyalty to the Trump administration will put the lives of millions of women at risk.”

In a statement, Dr. Amesh Adalja, senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, also criticized her nomination.

“The fact that Dr. Overton played a central role in an executive order that shrinks the childhood vaccine schedule and calls for splitting MMR into shots that don’t exist, all without new evidence, calls into question her scientific judgement,” Adalja said. “The fact that she has garnered the praise of the nation’s chief anti-vaccine propagandist, Secretary Kennedy, is also concerning.”

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Judge orders White House to restore press passes for CNN, Politico and MS NOW

Some banned media organizations return to the White House after judge’s order
Some banned media organizations return to the White House after judge’s order
Signs of support for AP, CNN, MS NOW and POLITICO hang on the White House grounds on September 21, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Finn Gomez/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — A federal judge has granted CNN, Politico and MS NOW a temporary restraining order requiring the White House to restore the outlets’ hard-pass press credentials.

The order requires the defendants, excluding President Donald Trump, as well as their agents and representatives, to “immediately return, reinstate, and restore” the White House hard-pass press credentials held by employees of CNN, MS NOW and Politico.

Judge Timothy Kelly granted the media organizations’ request in the ongoing case Cable News Networks, Inc. v. Trump after their credentials were revoked on Sept. 18, according to the court order.

The temporary restraining order will remain in effect for 14 days, unless otherwise ordered by the court.

Kelly expressed skepticism about the Trump administration’s argument that the stories it cited as justification for revoking the outlets’ press credentials raised national security concerns.

Kelly described the stories identified by the administration as “routine” and said he was “skeptical” that the government’s stated interest in safeguarding national security was the actual motivation for revoking the hard passes. He also noted that Trump did not mention national security concerns when he announced the ban.

“Nothing in the record that predates this suit suggests that the revocation of Plaintiffs’ hard passes was motivated by national security concerns,” Kelly said in the filing. “Certainly, that is not what President Trump said when he announced that he was “banning” Plaintiffs from the White House — instead, he focused on the alleged lack of truthfulness and negativity of Plaintiffs’ reporting.”

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

‘Can’t catch a break’: Shoppers squeezed by surging inflation and higher interest rates

‘Can’t catch a break’: Shoppers squeezed by surging inflation and higher interest rates
‘Can’t catch a break’: Shoppers squeezed by surging inflation and higher interest rates
A customer purchases gas at a station, Sept. 15, 2026, in Chicago. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

(NEW YORK) — Kelsey Benson said she was laid off from a job in sales earlier this month, leaving her without health insurance at a time when price hikes are weighing on the rest of her budget.

The monthly out-of-pocket cost of Benson’s name-brand medication for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder jumped from $120 to $500, she said. That sudden expense came at a time she was already struggling with rising rent and utility costs, she said.

“You should not have to wear yourself down to nothing to be able to live,” said Benson, 32, who lives in Queens, New York.

The financial strain has complicated Benson and her partner’s potential plans for buying a house and having a child, she said.

“The dream, many people have been told, is you get the white picket fence, the house,” Benson said. “It’s not attainable.”

Benson is hardly the only person getting hammered by price hikes. A monthslong surge of inflation set off by the Iran war has driven up costs nationwide for gasoline, groceries and other products, squeezing many household budgets.

Shoppers expect inflation to rise even more over the next year, according to a recent University of Michigan consumer survey, while individuals’ view of their financial outlook has worsened.

In response to rising prices, a key long-term Treasury rate hit its highest level in nearly two decades earlier this month, even before the Federal Reserve raised benchmark borrowing costs. The rise in borrowing costs pushed up rates for loans like credit cards and mortgages, threatening to worsen the financial crunch.

“A lot of people across America have cut the expenses that they can cut,” Ted Rossman, a financial analyst at nonprofit advisory firm Money Management International, told ABC News. “They feel like they can’t catch a break.”

Drew Davis, 26, a law student in New York City, said the recent surge in prices dawned on him in the meat section at his local grocery store.

During a shopping trip this summer, Davis said he noticed prices for his preferred types of beef and chicken had climbed $1 or $2 since he began law school three years ago.

“I’ll buy, like, fattier beef, or I’ll buy chicken instead of beef mostly, just because it’s cheaper a lot of the time,” Davis said.

Davis, who is financing his education with student loans, said his debt factors into spending decisions such as where he lives and what he buys amid an economic environment he described as “intense.”

Prices rose at an annual rate of 3.4% in August, the most recent month on record, federal government data showed. Inflation stands more than a percentage point higher than the Federal Reserve’s target rate of 2%.

The average price of a gallon of gas in the U.S. is $4.47, according to AAA, marking a 50% jump since the war broke out.

Grocery prices have increased more than 20% over the last five years, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data showed.

“People are feeling what’s happened the last several years,” Rossman said. “The accumulated toll is really stacking up.”

Steve Prentice, 70, who is semi-retired and works part-time at a yarn store in Tennessee, said the most noticeable price increase is gas.

“This is the first time I can recall gas being above $4 [a gallon],” Prentice said.

The cost crunch prompted Prentice and his wife to seek out bargains on groceries. Prices at all of the chain supermarkets nearby have “generally gone up,” Prentice said, forcing him and his wife to turn to lower-priced stores.

“Their prices seem a little bit more stable, but even they have gone up,” Prentice said.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Collins denies allegations in corruption report: ‘Absolutely outrageous’

Collins denies allegations in corruption report: ‘Absolutely outrageous’
Collins denies allegations in corruption report: ‘Absolutely outrageous’
U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) walks to the Senate floor on Sept. 23, 2026, in Washington, DC. Collins is in a tight Senate race against Democrat Troy Jackson. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins is vehemently denying a ProPublica report out earlier this week that says the FBI targeted her in a corruption probe, saying “it’s clearly a political hit job.”

The ProPublica report said that a Republican consultant asked defense firm Navatek and its former CEO Martin Kao for big donations to her campaign in exchange for millions in federal contracts. In 2024, the FBI sought to launch an investigation into Collins and the donor, but when President Donald Trump returned to office for his second term, the investigation died after he made cuts to the FBI, the report stated.

ABC News has not independently confirmed the reporting by ProPublica. Kao did not speak with ProPublica for its story.

“The Biden Justice Department found that there was no wrongdoing by any one of my campaign staff, my office, or me,” the five-term Maine senator said on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. “This is absolutely outrageous. It’s clearly a political hit job.”

Annie Clark, Collins’ deputy chief of staff, said that the Biden administration, FBI and Department of Justice had “thoroughly investigated the Navatek matter.”

“The Collins campaign cooperated fully with the FBI throughout the investigation, producing all of the documents it requested and serving as fact witnesses in official settings,” Clark said in a statement on social media, adding that these “issues were resolved in 2021, and the FBI has not contacted us about Martin Kao since then.”

FBI spokesperson Ben Williamson told ProPublica that the agency had investigated the claims against Collins years ago “and ultimately found nothing implicating Senator Collins or Senator Collins’ campaign. Any suggestion otherwise is totally false.”

Williamson did not respond to ProPublica’s questions about the alleged new, separate investigation launched in 2024.

Collins — who is running for reelection in the closely watched Maine Senate race, which could determine the balance of power in the upper chamber — said “it’s very frustrating and unfair to have it brought up this close to the election.”

Collins maintained that she learned the company was doing 3D printing research to build boats and were awarded the defense contracts because the Navy found its developments to be “valuable.”

“I’m telling you that this is completely false,” Collins said Tuesday of the ProPublica report’s allegations.

Clark on Tuesday also called the allegations in the report “categorically false.”

“The seven-year-old allegations made against Senator Collins and her staff in this piece are categorically false. There have never been any allegations of wrongdoing by the Collins for Senator campaign, and the campaign was never the target of the FBI investigation,” Clark wrote in a statement on social media.

Collins’ campaign manager, Steve Abbott, responded to the report and called the allegations false and outrageous.

“Not only false. I would say outrageous,” Abbott said.

Collins’ opponent in the Maine Senate race, Democratic candidate Troy Jackson, reacted to the report, saying “the jig is up.”

“This is corruption of the highest order,” Jackson wrote in a statement on Tuesday.

Asked for comment, PacMar Technologies — formerly known as Navatek — told ABC News that it’s “a victim.”

“The point here is that PacMar is a victim, like others, of Martin Kao’s illegal conduct and we have dedicated great time and expense in prosecuting Martin Kao and his cabal for their damage to our former company’s good name and reputation,” a spokesperson wrote in a statement.

Trump has not commented on the ProPublica report.

ABC News’ Sarah Beth Hensley contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Judge concludes Trump’s White House media ban hearing with no ruling

Judge concludes Trump’s White House media ban hearing with no ruling
Judge concludes Trump’s White House media ban hearing with no ruling
Journalists from CNN depart the White House grounds on Sept. 18, 2026, in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump announced via TruthSocial that he would be banning CNN, MSNOW and Politico from the White House. (Daniel Heuer/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — D.C. District Court Judge Tim Kelly ended a Wednesday hearing on whether President Donald Trump’s move banning three news organization from the White House violates the Constitution with no ruling after hearing arguments from both sides.

“I’ll consider what you’ve told me today and try to get you an answer as soon as I can,” Kelly told the attorneys.

This is a developing story.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Rep. Donalds downplays Trump connection on his governor campaign website

Rep. Donalds downplays Trump connection on his governor campaign website
Rep. Donalds downplays Trump connection on his governor campaign website
Florida Republican gubernatorial candidate U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) on Sept. 9, 2026, in Dallas, Texas. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — When Republican Rep. Bryon Donalds announced his campaign for Florida governor on Fox News in February 2025, he said he was “excited to have the full endorsement of President Trump,” and his campaign website described him as a “Trump-Endorsed Proven Conservative Fighter.”

This week, with Trump’s approval ratings hitting lows in the final stretch of the midterm campaign season, Donalds adjusted his website, removing several mentions of the president. 

His site now features video of Donalds campaigning and appearing on stage in front of supporters with his family — with Trump’s endorsement reduced to one of several from prominent Republicans rolling across the page.

Responding to the attention to his updated site, Donalds shared an updated image of his endorsements page, saying, “I am proud to have President Trump’s endorsement.”

“While everyone is focused on our website, check out our policy proposals to make life more affordable for Floridians,” he added.

The changes, similar to other GOP candidates, come as some Republicans are taking steps to distance themselves from Trump amid voters’ frustrations with the Iran war and rising gas and diesel prices.

Donalds’ home page also no longer features a photo of Donalds and his wife posing with Trump, or a section called “On the Issues,” that says Donalds “is committed to implementing President Trump’s Make America Great Again agenda so that our state and our nation’s best days are still ahead.”

A spokesman for Donalds said the congressman is “proud” to have Trump’s endorsement. Donalds, unlike some Republicans running for re-election, appeared on stage at the GOP midterm convention in Dallas earlier this month, helping the party sell Trump and Republicans’ legislative record. 

“Our campaign website reflects Byron’s focus on the issues that matter most to Floridians — affordability, insurance costs, and government transparency. He’s running to be the next Governor of Florida, is proud to have President Trump’s endorsement, and has real policy proposals to tackle those issues,” Gates McGavick told ABC News in a statement. 

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Possible measles exposure at Busch Stadium, local St. Louis-area businesses, officials warn

Possible measles exposure at Busch Stadium, local St. Louis-area businesses, officials warn
Possible measles exposure at Busch Stadium, local St. Louis-area businesses, officials warn
A general view of Busch Stadium, June 25, 2026, in St Louis, Missouri. (Joe Puetz/Getty Images)

(NEW YORK) — Missouri health officials are warning of a possible measles exposure at Busch Stadium and nearby local businesses in St. Louis and the larger county.

The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (MDHSS) said the possible exposures occurred between Sept. 12 and Sept. 14 and included local bars, a cafe, a restaurant, a sandwich shop, a grocery store and a convenience store.

The health department said exposed individuals should monitor for measles symptoms for 21 days starting from the date of exposure.

If symptoms appear, individuals are recommended to contact their local public health agency. Additionally, those who think they have measles should isolate themselves and call their healthcare provider before arriving to be tested.

The MDHSS did not immediately respond to an ABC News request for comment on the possible exposures.

Earlier this month, MDHSS announced a possible measles exposure at a train station in Sedalia, Missouri, after a vaccinated individual boarded a Chicago-bound train on Aug. 27.

About a week later, the St. Louis County Department of Public Health said a second individual who boarded the train on Aug. 27 was confirmed to have measles. The second individual was fully vaccinated and is the first case of measles in a county resident in 20 years, according to DPH.

The potential measles exposures at Busch Stadium and the St. Louis region is the third case linked to “train exposure in Missouri,” the health department said.

“Vaccination is one of the most effective ways to protect ourselves, our families and our community from measles,” Dr. Kanika Cunningham, director of the Saint Louis County Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We encourage residents to review their vaccination status, monitor for symptoms and contact their healthcare provider before seeking care if they believe they may have been exposed.”

Measles cases in the U.S. have surpassed 3,400 so far in 2026 with cases confirmed in 45 states and Washington, D.C., according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The CDC currently recommends that people receive two doses of the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine, the first at ages 12 to 15 months and the second between 4 and 6 years old. One dose is 93% effective against preventing measles infection and two doses are 97% effective, the CDC says.

However, CDC data shows vaccination rates have been lagging in recent years. During the 2025 to 2026 school year, 92.4% of kindergartners received the MMR vaccine, according to data. This is lower than the 95.2% seen in the 2019 to 2020 school year, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Eating more ultra-processed foods linked to worse health, study finds

Eating more ultra-processed foods linked to worse health, study finds
Eating more ultra-processed foods linked to worse health, study finds
(Getty Images stock photo)

(NEW YORK) — Eating more ultra-processed foods is linked to higher health risks, including death, according to a new study published in Family Medicine and Community Health. 

Researchers found that consuming higher amounts of ultra-processed foods increased the risk of heart disease, strokes, obesity, diabetes, depression and anxiety, digestive issues, and cancer. 

Ultra-processed foods contain “significant amounts of added sugars, salts, fats” and can be hyper-palatable, meaning they are engineered to taste especially appealing, Maya Feller, a registered dietitian, told ABC News. 

Examples include packaged snacks, processed meat products, cookies, cakes, sugary drinks, and many ready-to-eat meals. 

“Ultra-processed food is one of the major problems in public health,” Dr. Xiao Liu, lead author of the study, a physician at Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital and research fellow at Duke-NUS Medical School, told ABC News.

In the study, researchers examined the intake of ultra-processed foods globally, by reviewing over 50 studies that evaluated the diets of nearly 9 million adults worldwide over a timeframe ranging from 2 to 32 years. 

The risk of cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of death in the United States, was found to increase by 24% after consuming higher amounts of ultra-processed foods. 

The more people ate ultra-processed foods, the higher their risk of poor health outcomes. Each additional 100 grams a day was linked to a 14% higher heart risk and an 11% higher blood pressure risk. 

Higher consumption of ultra-processed foods was also linked to a higher risk of metabolic diseases, with the risk of diabetes increasing 24% and the risk of obesity increasing 23%.

More than 100 million Americans in the United States are living with obesity and more than 22 million have severe obesity, according to numbers from the CDC. The agency also found that the average American gets over half their daily calories from ultra-processed foods. 

Not all processed foods are the same,  Feller said, using an apple to explain the difference.

“You have a tree with apples, and the apples on the tree are in their whole form. You take the apple off the tree, and that is a step of processing. You slice the apple. That’s another step of processing. You puree the apple. You haven’t added anything to it. That’s also processing,” she said.

As more ingredients are added, the food becomes more processed, she explained.

Canned vegetables, cheese, and freshly made bread are considered processed because salt, sugar, or oil may have been added to preserve them. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods can include fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables, eggs, milk, beans, grains, meat, and fish that do not have salt, sugar, oils or additives.  

When shopping, Feller said consumers can look at ingredient lists to get a better sense of how processed a food is.

“Flip the package over, and if the front says blueberries, then the ingredient list should say blueberries,” she said.

For people trying to limit ultra-processed foods without significantly increasing their grocery bills, frozen and canned foods can still be useful options.

“Go to the freezer section. Look for frozen vegetables, frozen fruits, frozen grains that have nothing added to them,” Feller added. 

She also recommended lower-sodium canned foods and affordable staples such as pasta, rice and beans.

For parents trying to help children make healthier choices, Feller noted that strict control may be less realistic than education and modeling healthy habits at home.

“We can’t control what they do when they have at lunch,” she said. “Once they’ve left the house, it’s about education, positive modeling and open conversation.”

She added that family meals give parents more control over the foods children are exposed to at home, while conversations about nutrition can help guide the choices they make on their own.

Feller says that people do not need to eliminate all ultra-processed foods from their diets. Instead, the research points to the potential benefits of reducing overall intake as a more reachable goal.

“Don’t expect that you’re going to swap your pantry over or your refrigerator overnight,” Feller said. “Choose two or three things that you eat on a regular basis that are ultra-processed and think about swapping those out for things in their whole or minimally processed form.” 

The researchers noted that people can lower their risk of these health conditions by improving their diets, which include limiting ultra-processed foods and eating more vegetables and fruits. 

“In our modern society, our diet and food is maybe not safe… we should eat more vegetables and reduce the ultra-processed food to make us healthier,” said Liu. 

Dr. Ashley Thomas is board-certified in internal medicine, board-eligible in occupational and environmental medicine, and a member of the ABC News Medical Unit.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

What are the financial benefits of higher interest rates? Experts explain

What are the financial benefits of higher interest rates? Experts explain
What are the financial benefits of higher interest rates? Experts explain
Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh speaks during a news conference following Federal Open Market Committee meetings at Federal Reserve Headquarters, Sept. 16, 2026, in Washington. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

(NEW YORK) — A key long-term Treasury rate hit its highest level in nearly two decades earlier this month, even before the Federal Reserve raised benchmark borrowing costs.

The Fed hiked interest rates a quarter of a percentage point in an effort to battle back a monthslong surge of inflation. The rise in borrowing costs pushed up rates for loans like credit cards and mortgages, threatening to worsen a budget crunch as shoppers weather price hikes for gas and other essentials.

Those dangers, however, come along with potential financial benefits, some experts told ABC News. The hike in borrowing costs directly benefits savers, who stand to gain from an uptick in the interest yielded by accounts held at banks, they said.

Financial products like high-yield savings accounts and certificates of deposit, or CDs, provide options for investors eager to take advantage of the favorable environment for savers, they added, though such products carry limitations of their own.

“Higher interest rates incentivize people to park money in the bank and spend less of it,” James Cox, a financial advisor and managing partner of Virginia-based Harris Financial Group, told ABC News. “If you’re a person who has accumulated assets, higher interest rates can be beneficial.”

Interest rate hikes make it more lucrative for banks to hold money, which in turn puts pressure on financial institutions to pass along some of those earnings to depositors through higher yields.

As a result, some banks have bid up each other’s yield offerings to attract customers.

The average return on a savings account in the U.S. registered at 0.64% annual percentage yield as of Tuesday, marking a slight increase from 0.62% annual percentage yield last month, before the Fed’s rate hike, Bankrate data showed.

An incremental uptick in interest rates for savings accounts or other funds may provide a modicum of financial benefit, but it is unlikely to dramatically improve a household’s income, Cox said.

“It’s not going to materially change the interest-rate picture for a family’s savings,” Cox said.

Even so, analysts said, investors can avail themselves of products that make the most of higher interest rates, such as high-yield savings accounts and CDs.

Financial institutions have not settled on what exactly constitutes a high-yield savings account. But the name indicates the key characteristics of this financial product: a savings account that delivers high returns.

While no specific threshold earns an account the moniker of “high-yield,” the enhanced savings from such accounts can prove substantial, some analysts said.

High-yield savings accounts offer customers as much as 4.2% annual percentage yield, Bankrate data showed, putting interest rates well above the nationwide average of 0.64% for savings accounts.

“As a saver, you can make more money in a high-yield savings account,” Kate Ashford, lead wealth writer at NerdWallet, told ABC News. “There’s no real downside.”

The annual inflation rate currently stands at 3.4%, meaning price increases outpace the average interest yielded by savings accounts at banks. As a result, the purchasing power of money kept in a savings account can drop, even as the total dollar amount increases, Ashford said.

“A high-yield savings account can prevent inflation from eating away the value of what you’ve got,” Ashford said.

In some cases, the interest rate on a high-yield savings account increases automatically in response to a rate hike at the Fed.

“A high-yield savings account of my own saw an increase within 24 hours of the Fed’s announcement,” Ashord said.

A CD, meanwhile, is a type of savings account that offers a fixed interest rate over a given period of time. If depositors remove their funds before their agreed-upon end date, however, they incur a penalty.

Financial institutions often offer CDs at elevated interest rates in the aftermath of a rate hike at the Fed. Typically, long-term CDs spanning three or five years deliver higher interest rates than short-term CDs, since a wider time horizon requires investors to part with their funds for a longer period.

High-yield savings accounts and CDs carry some downside, however. The interest rate promised by a high-yield savings account or a CD means it lacks the possibility of enormous gains, unlike a riskier instrument such as the stock market, some analysts said.

“In the stock market, you have the potential to make more on your money over time,” Ashford said.

Still, Ashford added, a high-yield savings account or CD “gets your money moving in a forward direction.”

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.