Billie Eilish and brother FINNEAS to guest on their mom’s new vegan cooking show

Billie Eilish and brother FINNEAS to guest on their mom’s new vegan cooking show
Billie Eilish and brother FINNEAS to guest on their mom’s new vegan cooking show
Maggie Baird in ‘Climate Kitchen: A Recipe for Sustainable Living’ (Courtesy WETA)

Billie Eilish’s mom, Maggie Baird, is venturing into the culinary world.

She’s teaming with public media organization WETA in Washington, D.C., for a cooking series called Climate Kitchen, set to premiere in 2027. Eilish and her brother, FINNEAS, will be among the guests on the show, which is described in a press release as “part cooking show, part lifestyle series, part docuseries.”

Climate Kitchen will feature recipes for affordable plant-based meals, plus features and information about how our meals can either hurt or help the planet. Other guests will include Martha Stewart, FINNEAS’ fiancee, Claudia Sulewski, and sustainable living experts.

Baird told People that she’s created recipe books for both Eilish and FINNEAS, adding, “It makes me so happy when they tell me they made one of the recipes.” One of Eilish’s favorites, she said, is a spicy noodle and tofu soup, to which the singer adds “enough chili flakes in it to heat up a room!”

In a statement, Maggie said the series will show “small, simple behavior shifts can build toward lasting difference in our own health and the health of our planet.” She added, “Plant-based food is not the only solution to climate change, but there is no solution without it.”

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

The Kinks’ Dave Davies reveals first reaction to Moby’s ‘Lola’ comments: ‘Who is Moby?’

The Kinks’ Dave Davies reveals first reaction to Moby’s ‘Lola’ comments: ‘Who is Moby?’
The Kinks’ Dave Davies reveals first reaction to Moby’s ‘Lola’ comments: ‘Who is Moby?’
Musician Dave Davies appears in a portrait taken on April 17, 2023 in New York City. (Photo by Al Pereira/Getty Images)

The Kinks’ Dave Davies recently defended the band’s iconic song “Lola” after Moby called the song’s lyrics “gross and transphobic” in an interview with The Guardian.

In a new interview with The Telegraph, Dave says he was “shocked and really quite upset” when he heard about Moby’s comments, noting his first thought when he heard about them was “Who is Moby?”

And when he told his brother, bandmate and “Lola” songwriter Ray Davies about them, he had the same reaction, asking Dave, “Who the f*** is Moby?” Dave adds that Ray “wasn’t happy at all.”

Talking about the tune, which was released in 1970, Dave says when Ray first played it for him he thought it was “fun and beautiful.”

“It was about real people and real people’s antics. There is nothing nasty about it,” he says. “People were quite shocked by it. But we loved it, and the world seemed to love it too. No one mentioned the word transphobia then. I don’t think the word existed.”

Dave says of Moby’s comments, “I worried that it could turn people against us because it can feel like people are becoming weirder by the day.” He added, “They are always quick to judge and make assumptions about others. It is very rigid thinking. They don’t know that there is always a backstory. It can be dangerous to smear people.”

But Dave says he doesn’t hold anything against Moby.

“I don’t bear anyone malice. I think he made a clumsy mistake,” says Dave. “All music, all art, should be applauded. It’s not for me or for anyone else to decide what is right or wrong. We should be grateful that we live in a world where people are free to make music and say what they want to say.”

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Judge hears arguments over seizure of Fulton County 2020 election records

Judge hears arguments over seizure of Fulton County 2020 election records
Judge hears arguments over seizure of Fulton County 2020 election records
Ballots are counted on election night at the Fulton County Elections Hub and Operation Center on November 5, 2024 in Fairburn, Georgia. (Photo by Megan Varner/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — The FBI’s application for the warrant that led to the search and seizure of more than 650 boxes of 2020 election records from a Fulton County, Georgia, election site in January lacked any kind of evidence of intentional misconduct and relied on incorrect information, an elections expert with twenty years of experience told a federal judge Friday. 

Testifying as Fulton County’s first witness in its lawsuit against the Trump administration, Ryan Macias told the court that his review of the claims made by the FBI in their application lacked a “basis in reality.”

“The content of the witnesses is incorrect and in many cases contradictory,” he said. “The information in there is not based in reality.” 

Lawyers with the Department of Justice attempted to cast doubt on Macias’ testimony by arguing he lacks direct knowledge of the testimony in the case and is inexperienced in criminal investigations, though he was only qualified as an expert on election administration. Macias worked for both the federal government and California to administer elections as well as consulted for Fulton County in 2020.

Assistant Attorney General Tysen Duva broadly claimed, without citing any examples, that criminal investigations regularly stem from matters where initial investigations found no evidence of wrongdoing. 

“Are you aware that happens all the time?” Duva asked Macias. 

“No,” Macias responded. 

“That’s because you don’t know,” Duva responded. 

During his direct examination, Macias went through each of the claims made in the FBI’s application for the warrant to debunk and cast doubt on each allegation. 

“Do ballot images have any impact on the final tabulation of ballots?” asked attorney Kamal Ghali, referencing the claim that election officials produced inconsistent numbers of ballot images from the 2020 election. 

“No they do not,” Macias said. 

“Is the absence of ballot images evidence of misconduct?” Ghali asked. 

“No it is not,” he responded. 

Fulton County Superior Court Clerk Ché Alexander testified that the FBI refused her request to help her make an inventory of the election records they seized from her office. She testified that she was at her office during the raid and asked to make an inventory to secure the chain of custody for more than 600 boxes of records, including original ballots from the election. 

“I asked the agent to go box by box to understand what they were taking and they said absolutely not,” Alexander testified, though the FBI likely did an inventory of their own.

“I have a personal interest to do my job to keep those records safe and secure,” Alexander said. “I am under a court order to maintain records I do not have.”

DOJ lawyers sought to cast doubt on her claims, including by playing a video from a 2023 court proceeding when a lawyer for her office urged a judge to allow the removal of the records. According to the attorney, Fulton County wanted to make room for incoming records related to the 2024 election. 

“Her obligation is over at this point,” the attorney for Fulton County said in 2023. “It has a significant impact on operations. The records cannot just be kept there forever.” 

DOJ attorney Peter Cooch argued that the search of the office was effectively doing Alexander a favor, remarking, “Now that the records are sealed, the space is available to you now.” 

DOJ lawyers also played body camera footage from the raid in which Fulton County’s elections director can be heard saying, “If you want to take off 700 boxes of ballots, have at it … They can go play paper airplanes for all I care.”

Attorney Abbe Lowell, representing the Fulton County officials, argued that the search was based on incorrect information from unreliable witnesses related to claims that are years beyond the statute of limitations. 

“A week doesn’t go by without someone in the administration making an allegation of voter fraud,” Lowell said before reminding the judge that the investigation itself originated from an attorney who tried to overturn the 2020 election who was previously sanctioned for making false claims about the outcome. Lowell said the reliance on the unreliable witnesses would make “George Orwell smile in his grave.” 

DOJ attorneys have insisted that the search was based on evidence of potential misconduct and accused Fulton County officials of speculating about “some kind of grand conspiracy.” 

“It just seems like a loosey-goosey theory,” said DOJ attorney Michael Weisbuch. “They don’t like the vibe of what’s happening because that’s not a constitutional standard.” 

U.S. District Judge JP Boulee, a Trump appointee, will decide on Fulton County’s request to force the Trump administration to return the sensitive records taken from the election site. 

After election officials raised concerns about the basis for the January 2026 search, Judge Boulee last month ordered the Department of Justice to publicly release the application for the warrant, which revealed that the investigation was triggered by an attorney and close ally of President Trump who sought to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

According to the unsealed court records, the investigation centers on long-debunked allegations of voter fraud that have already been thoroughly investigated. 

Fulton County election officials have since pushed for the return of the records, arguing that the investigation focuses on “human errors that its own sources confirm occur in almost every election … without any intentional wrongdoing whatsoever.”

“The Affidavit omits numerous material facts — including from the very reports and publicly-disclosed investigations that the Affiant cites — that confirm the alleged conduct was previously investigated and found to be unintentional,” attorneys for the Fulton County officials argued. 

In a late setback ahead of Friday’s hearing, Judge Boulee quashed an attempt to force the FBI agent behind the search warrant to testify, concluding that questioning the agent could reveal “process and scope of the DOJ’s investigation,” which remains ongoing. 

President Donald Trump has long criticized the outcome of the 2020 election results in Georgia, personally pushing to overturn the results after his loss and later being indicted in two criminal cases over his actions. Those cases have since been dismissed, and Trump has continued to push for criminal accountability for what he baselessly alleged was a stolen election. 

Through a call with Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard — who was present at the January raid — President Trump personally addressed some of the agents who conducted the search and told them they were doing great work by investigating Georgia’s elections, ABC News previously reported

“I was at Fulton County, sir, at the request of the president and to work with the FBI to observe this action that had long been awaited,” Gabbard told lawmakers earlier this month when asked about her presence at the search. “It is my role based on statute that Congress has passed to have oversight over election security to include counterintelligence.” 

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Dow closes down nearly 800 points as Iran war hits one-month mark

Dow closes down nearly 800 points as Iran war hits one-month mark
Dow closes down nearly 800 points as Iran war hits one-month mark
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), March 27, 2026, in New York. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

(NEW YORK) — Stocks closed significantly lower on Friday as the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran showed little sign of an imminent resolution that would end one of the worst global oil shocks in decades.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 790 points, or 1.7%, while the S&P 500 fell 1.6%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq dropped 2.1%.

The session on Friday marked the end of a woeful week for the major stock indexes. The Dow declined 1% this week, while the S&P 500 fell 2%. The Nasdaq decreased 3%.

Late Thursday, President Donald Trump postponed U.S. attacks on power plants in Iran in an apparent effort to avoid escalation of the Middle East conflict.

In a post on social media on Thursday, Trump said he was “pausing the period of Energy Plant destruction” until April 6.

In the event of such an attack, Iran has said it would carry out strikes against energy infrastructure in neighboring countries, according to Iran’s Fars News Agency state media.

Wall Street appeared to find little solace in the reprieve from large-scale tit-for-tat attacks on infrastructure.

Iran continues to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for oil delivery. The strait facilitates the transport of about one-fifth of the global supply of crude oil and natural gas.

Global oil prices stood at about $113 a barrel on Friday, marking a staggering 61% rise since war with Iran began a month ago.

Fatih Birol, the executive director of the International Energy Agency (IEA), earlier this week said the current oil crisis had surpassed the combined effect of worldwide energy shocks in the 1970s.

The global economy faces a “major, major threat,” Birol said at an event in Canberra, Australia, noting that no country would be “immune to the effects of this crisis if it continues to go in this direction.”

U.S. Treasury yields climbed on Thursday, suggesting concern about economic instability and inflation stemming from the Iran war.

The yield on a 10-year Treasury bond, or the amount paid to a bondholder annually, stands at about 4.45%, marking a nearly half-percentage point jump from a month earlier.

On Friday, bond yields soared close to levels reached in the aftermath of President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs last April, when the 10-year Treasury yield peaked at around 4.5%.

Since bonds pay a given investor a fixed amount each year, the specter of inflation risks higher prices that would eat away at those annual payouts.

In turn, bonds often become less attractive in response to economic turmoil. When demand falls, bond yields rise.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

How police arrested a suspect in the 1990 ‘Lovers’ Lane’ cold case murders in Houston

How police arrested a suspect in the 1990 ‘Lovers’ Lane’ cold case murders in Houston
How police arrested a suspect in the 1990 ‘Lovers’ Lane’ cold case murders in Houston
Floyd William Parrott, 64, was arrested in connection with the 1990 murders of Cheryl Henry and Andy Atkinson, the Houston police said. (Houston Police Department)

(HOUSTON, Texas) — A man who had a history of impersonating law enforcement has been arrested in a 1990 cold case double murder known as the “Lovers’ Lane” killings, authorities said.

Floyd William Parrott, 64, is charged with capital murder for the killings of Cheryl Henry, 22, and Garland “Andy” Atkinson, 21, Houston police said.

The victims’ car was found parked in a cul-de-sac on Aug. 23, 1990, police said. Henry and Atkinson, who had been dating for a few weeks, were found near the car, according to court documents. Both of their necks were cut with knives and they were tied up with rope, documents said, and Henry was raped.

At least 100 people were looked at as potential suspects over the decades, but Parrott was not one of them, Harris County District Attorney Sean Teare said at a news conference on Friday.

In late 2025, a Houston police sergeant was looking into a tip that named Parrott, and the sergeant found a Houston police report from 1996 in which Parrott was named as the suspect in a sex assault, court documents said. Parrott claimed the sex was consensual, documents said, and a grand jury declined to indict, Teare said.

The DNA from the 1996 case was “recently placed” into CODIS, the national law enforcement DNA database, documents said, and that DNA was found to be a match to swabs from Cheryl Henry’s sexual assault exam at her autopsy.

“A June 1990 sexual assault case also had a case-to-case hit,” court documents said.

Teare said Parrott impersonated law enforcement in the late 1980s, the 1990s and the 2000s.

In May 1988, Parrott was arrested for impersonating a police officer, court documents said. He was again arrested for impersonating a police officer in May 1990, and he was out on bond when the June 1990 sex assault and the August 1990 murders occurred, court documents said.

Parrott lived in the Houston area for most of his life and left a few years ago, Teare said. He was arrested in Lincoln, Nebraska, on Wednesday and is awaiting extradition to the Harris County, police said. Investigators interviewed Parrott on Wednesday and he denied knowing Cheryl Henry, according to court documents.

“Cheryl was my best friend. We did everything together,” Henry’s younger sister Shane Henry, said at the news conference.

“Hearing that the person responsible has finally been caught does not bring her back,” she said, “… but it does bring a sense of relief knowing that justice is moving forward.”

Teare said the DA’s office believes Parrott committed “numerous different types of crimes.”

“If you recognize this individual and he pulled you over … call us,” he said.

“If you met him once, if you met him at a club, if you knew him at all, reach out,” he said. 

Teare said the DA’s office can be reached at 713-274-5640.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

How police arrested a suspect in the 1990 ‘Lovers’ Lane’ cold case murders in Houston

How police arrested a suspect in the 1990 ‘Lovers’ Lane’ cold case murders in Houston
How police arrested a suspect in the 1990 ‘Lovers’ Lane’ cold case murders in Houston
Floyd William Parrott, 64, was arrested in connection with the 1990 murders of Cheryl Henry and Andy Atkinson, the Houston police said. (Houston Police Department)

(HOUSTON, Texas) — A man who had a history of impersonating law enforcement has been arrested in a 1990 cold case double murder known as the “Lovers’ Lane” killings, authorities said.

Floyd William Parrott, 64, is charged with capital murder for the killings of Cheryl Henry, 22, and Garland “Andy” Atkinson, 21, Houston police said.

The victims’ car was found parked in a cul-de-sac on Aug. 23, 1990, police said. Henry and Atkinson, who had been dating for a few weeks, were found near the car, according to court documents. Both of their necks were cut with knives and they were tied up with rope, documents said, and Henry was raped.

At least 100 people were looked at as potential suspects over the decades, but Parrott was not one of them, Harris County District Attorney Sean Teare said at a news conference on Friday.

In late 2025, a Houston police sergeant was looking into a tip that named Parrott, and the sergeant found a Houston police report from 1996 in which Parrott was named as the suspect in a sex assault, court documents said. Parrott claimed the sex was consensual, documents said, and a grand jury declined to indict, Teare said.

The DNA from the 1996 case was “recently placed” into CODIS, the national law enforcement DNA database, documents said, and that DNA was found to be a match to swabs from Cheryl Henry’s sexual assault exam at her autopsy.

“A June 1990 sexual assault case also had a case-to-case hit,” court documents said.

Teare said Parrott impersonated law enforcement in the late 1980s, the 1990s and the 2000s.

In May 1988, Parrott was arrested for impersonating a police officer, court documents said. He was again arrested for impersonating a police officer in May 1990, and he was out on bond when the June 1990 sex assault and the August 1990 murders occurred, court documents said.

Parrott lived in the Houston area for most of his life and left a few years ago, Teare said. He was arrested in Lincoln, Nebraska, on Wednesday and is awaiting extradition to the Harris County, police said. Investigators interviewed Parrott on Wednesday and he denied knowing Cheryl Henry, according to court documents.

“Cheryl was my best friend. We did everything together,” Henry’s younger sister Shane Henry, said at the news conference.

“Hearing that the person responsible has finally been caught does not bring her back,” she said, “… but it does bring a sense of relief knowing that justice is moving forward.”

Teare said the DA’s office believes Parrott committed “numerous different types of crimes.”

“If you recognize this individual and he pulled you over … call us,” he said.

“If you met him once, if you met him at a club, if you knew him at all, reach out,” he said. 

Teare said the DA’s office can be reached at 713-274-5640.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Report: Biopic about Steve Marriott and Small Faces in the works

Report: Biopic about Steve Marriott and Small Faces in the works
Report: Biopic about Steve Marriott and Small Faces in the works
Steve Marriott (1947-1991) of rock and pop group Small Faces on the set of the Associated Rediffusion Television pop music television show Ready Steady Go! at Wembley Television Studios in London on 4th March 1966. (Photo by Ivan Keeman/Redferns)

A biopic about the late Steve Marriott and his band Small Faces is in the works, according to Deadline.

The film, All or Nothing, will be inspired by the West End musical of the same name, written by actress and writer Carol Harrison. It is based on her friendship with the singer, who she met when she was 8 years old.

According to the film’s description, Marriott’s story is “seen through the eyes of a young female fan,” noting, “through their emotional connection, we uncover the complexities and contradictions that burn beneath the showman’s mask, as Steve struggles to navigate life in the spotlight, disguising his raw private turmoil and vulnerability with arrogance and caustic humor.”

Marriott formed Small Faces in 1965 with bassist Ronnie Lane, drummer Kenney Jones and keyboardist Jimmy Winston. Marriott left the group in 1969 to form Humble Pie. The band went on without him, recruiting Rod Stewart and Ronnie Wood, and renaming themselves Faces. Marriott, who was posthumously inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame as a member of Small Faces, died in 1991 at the age of 44.

The film, due to start production in the fall, will feature Small Faces’ music. Deadline notes that the estates of Marriott and Lane have both given their blessings to the film.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Democrat Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick found guilty of 25 ethics violations

Democrat Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick found guilty of 25 ethics violations
Democrat Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick found guilty of 25 ethics violations
Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick appears for a hearing of the House Ethics Committee on Capitol Hill, on March 26, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — A special panel of the bipartisan House Ethics Committee determined on Friday that Florida Democrat Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick was guilty of 25 ethics violations, including commingling of campaign and personal funds.

The determination came after the panel held a rare public hearing on Thursday to consider whether Cherfilus-McCormick violated House rules amid sweeping allegations of fraud against her — and a four-count federal indictment.

The panel said in a statement that deliberations in the case “lasted until well past midnight” and that they found “clear and convincing evidence” that the congresswoman was guilty of all but two of the 27 counts. 

“We had a good, robust discussion on all counts, voted on all counts, and we were able to find agreement on 25 of the 27 counts,” Ethics Chairman Michael Guest, R-Miss., told ABC News on Friday morning.

The ethics violations include acceptance of improper campaign contributions, false statements, commingling of campaign and personal funds and reporting errors on financial disclosures.

The full House Ethics Committee will hold a hearing after the April congressional recess to “determine what, if any, sanction would be appropriate for the Committee to recommend.” The sanction recommendations could include censure or expulsion, which would require a two-thirds majority vote.

“There will be a sanctions hearing,” Guest said. “That date has not been set, but there will be a sanctions hearing sometime, we hope shortly after we return back from the Easter recess.”

Separately, Cherfilus-McCormick was indicted in November by a federal grand jury on charges of stealing $5 million in Federal Emergency Management Agency funds, which she is accused of laundering to support her 2021 congressional campaign. 

The indictment alleges Cherfilus-McCormick, 46, and her brother Edwin Cherfilus, 51, received a $5 million overpayment in FEMA funds directed to their family health care company in connection with a contract for COVID-19 vaccination staffing in 2021.

Cherfilus-McCormick has denied any wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty to the federal criminal charges against her. 

During Thursday’s hourslong hearing, lawmakers on the panel questioned Cherfilus-McCormick’s counsel and the committee’s investigative staff about the allegations against the congresswoman.  

Cherfilus-McCormick did not address the committee throughout the proceedings, but she took notes and occasionally talked to her attorney.

Her attorney, William Barzee, demanded that his client receive a full hearing — allowing him to call in witnesses.

Guest pushed back on this request, saying Cherfilus-McCormick has refused to cooperate with the panel’s ongoing investigation.

Barzee acknowledged that the congresswoman “made a lot of mistakes” on financial forms.

In a statement to ABC News ahead of Thursday’s hearing, the congresswoman said: “I welcome the opportunity to set the record straight and challenge these inaccuracies, when I am legally able to do so. Make no mistake: I am innocent and I am a fighter. My district is made up of fighters. I will continue to fight for the people I was elected to serve.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson said that while he believes in “due process,” the congresswoman “has egregiously violated the law.” 

“This is a very serious matter. I think even many Democrats, even members of her own party, have publicly said that the evidence is so stark … but we have to process this internally and see how this goes,” Johnson said Thursday. 

The adjudicatory subcommittee that held the hearing is made up of an equal number of three Republicans and three Democrats will hear Cherfilus-McCormick’s case Thursday.

In addition to Guest, the chairman, the subcommittee is made up Democratic Rep. Mark DeSaulnier as ranking member. Democratic Reps. Sylvia Garcia, Glenn Ivey and Suhas Subramanyam and Republican Reps. Ashley Hinson, Brad Knott and Nathaniel Moran also serve on the subcommittee.

“I am deeply disappointed the Committee chose to move forward with this trial while denying my legal team reasonable time to prepare. That raises serious concerns about due process and the fundamental rights every American is entitled to under our Constitution,” the congresswoman said in a statement to ABC News. 

Speaker Johnson previously deferred to the members of the House to determine whether the congresswoman should be expelled from the House. The last member to be expelled was former New York GOP Rep. George Santos over using campaign dollars for his personal enrichment in 2023 — only the sixth representative ever ousted. 

“Expulsion, obviously, is effectively the political death penalty. There are occasions that meet that standard, but it’s a decision of the body to determine that,” Johnson said. 

“You look at all the factors and you — you figure that out. We’ll be doing that here in this case,” Johnson said. “It seems that this member of Congress has egregiously violated the law and exploited taxpayers and all the rest, and that, that would be, it would be a harsh penalty necessary for that.”

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has promised Democrats won’t help Republicans kick her out of Congress, regardless of the ethics inquiry.

“Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick is entitled to the presumption of innocence, like every other American,” Jeffries told reporters on Feb. 2. “I’m a hard no as it relates to the effort to expel her, and it’s going to fail.”

The last public ethics trial occurred in 2010 when New York Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel came before the panel. Rangel was later censured over failing to report assets on his financial disclosure forms, improperly obtaining four rent-controlled apartments in New York, and failing to disclose financial arrangements for a villa in the Dominican Republic.

Rangel maintained that he never knowingly broke any laws. “I truly believe I have not been treated fairly,” Rangel told the Ethics Committee before storming out of his hearing.

ABC News’ Justin Gomez contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

House Republicans reject Senate DHS funding bill, Trump signs memo to pay TSA workers

House Republicans reject Senate DHS funding bill, Trump signs memo to pay TSA workers
House Republicans reject Senate DHS funding bill, Trump signs memo to pay TSA workers
U.S. Capitol Buildiong. (Tim Graham/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday flatly rejected the Senate’s bill to fund most of the Department of Homeland Security except for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and parts of Customs and Border Protection.

Johnson said House Republicans will instead plow ahead with an alternative proposal: a short-term bill to fund the entire department for 60 days, until May 22.

“This gambit that was done last night is a joke,” Johnson told reporters in a news conference.

Johnson said the House would vote on the stop-gap proposal “as soon as possible.” Lawmakers were notified that votes are expected on Friday night, though the exact timing remains unclear.

If the House succeeds, the measure will head back to the Senate, where Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has vowed that it is “dead on arrival.”

All this means the partial government shutdown, now in its 42nd day, is likely to continue.

Amid the gridlock on Capitol Hill, President Donald Trump on Friday signed a presidential memorandum directing Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin to pay TSA employees. DHS said that workers will start seeing paychecks on Monday.

President Trump, in a phone interview with Fox News on Friday afternoon, said the Senate deal on DHS “wasn’t good” and “wasn’t appropriate.”

The Senate, at 2 a.m. on Friday morning, approved a funding bill that included TSA, Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Coast Guard and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

The package did not include money for ICE or parts of CBP, though those agencies continue to receive funds due to an influx of cash provided in the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill passed by Congress last summer.

Also absent from the Senate bill are any of the reforms to ICE’s operating procedures that Democrats have been repeatedly demanding following the fatal shootings of two American citizens in Minneapolis by federal agents earlier this year.

Still, Schumer said he was proud of Democrats who “held the line” on their objection to funding ICE and CBP without reforms.

“Democrats held firm in our position that Donald Trump’s rogue and deadly militia should not get more funding without serious reforms and we will continue to fight for those reforms,” he said.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune lambasted Democrats on the floor for what he framed as their refusal to negotiate in good faith. He said Democrats could have secured some of their desired reforms if they hadn’t complicated negotiations.

“We could be standing here right now passing a funding bill with a list of reforms if the Democrats had made the smallest effort to actually reach an agreement. But they didn’t, because it’s now clear to everyone, Democrats didn’t actually want a solution, they wanted an issue, politics over policy, self-interest over reform, pandering to their base over actually solving a problem,” Thune said.

Senate Republicans vowed to work on a package later this year to approve even more funding for ICE and CBP, saying they aim to do it using reconciliation — a budget tool that, if successful, would allow them to sidestep Democratic objection and pass the bill without any Democratic support.

Republicans are already warning that that bill will be a much harsher and Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., vowed it would “supercharge deportations.”

ABC News’ Allison Pecorin and Lalee Ibssa contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Fetty Wap introduces fans to ‘Zavier’ on new album

Fetty Wap introduces fans to ‘Zavier’ on new album
Fetty Wap introduces fans to ‘Zavier’ on new album
Cover art for Fetty Wap’s ‘Zavier’ (300 Entertainment)

Fetty Wap has released a new album, Zavier, introducing fans to the name his family calls him and the real person behind the moniker.

The project features G. Herbo, Wiz Khalifa, Max B, Monty, Honey Bxby, Tink and more. It’s led by the single “White Roses,” which includes background vocals from his sisters Divinity and Ymanie; the video is now available to stream on YouTube.

“I want fans to hear the evolution,” Fetty says in a statement. “It’s still Fetty, but it’s a version that’s been through life and came back stronger.”

“I came up with many songs while incarcerated, especially during the six months I spent in solitary confinement,” he continues. “Even in difficult environments, creativity never leaves you; music was still a way for me to express myself. I’ve had time to reflect, grow, and really think about the kind of artist and man I want to be moving forward. The music still has the energy people know me for, but there’s also more honesty and perspective in it now.”

Zavier, now available on streaming services, marks Fetty’s first album since being released from prison on charges of conspiracy to distribute drugs. He’s set to celebrate with a series of “Welcome Home” shows in April, with stops in Montclair, New Jersey; Hartford, Connecticut; Albany, New York; and Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. More shows will be announced at a later date.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.