DeSantis says his economic plan hits ‘woke’ capitalism, China, immigration

DeSantis says his economic plan hits ‘woke’ capitalism, China, immigration
DeSantis says his economic plan hits ‘woke’ capitalism, China, immigration
Scott Olson/Getty Images

(ROCHESTER, N.H.) — As his presidential campaign embarks on a strategic reset, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday unveiled a broad economic agenda aimed at, among other things, severing the United States’ business ties with China, ending “reckless” federal spending and fighting “woke” policies that he argues have infiltrated America’s financial systems.

The Republican presidential hopeful took a brief reprieve from a schedule loaded with small-venue events to roll out a 10-point plan that he dubbed the “Declaration of Economic Independence.”

“Our country is in decline right now,” DeSantis told an audience at a Rochester warehouse.

His new economic policies echo and expand on various key parts of his pitch to conservative voters so far, including promising to overhaul the country’s tax code, to make it simpler and more competitive; promising to roll back the “bureaucratic state” and “unleash our domestic energy sector, modernize and protect our grid, and advance American energy independence”; and promising to curb the use of diversity, equity and inclusion programs in the corporate sector, which DeSantis’ platform labels as “discrimination.”

His new plan vows to ensure 3% economic growth — slightly higher than the current rate — and a “great industrial revival, with a goal to become #1 in the world for skilled trades by 2030.”

At his event on Monday, he said, “I’m running for president because we need to reverse the decline in this country and restore our country to the greatness that it deserves, and that begins with restoring an American economy that actually works for American families again.”

DeSantis placed much of the blame for not achieving that on what his campaign called the country’s “abusive relationship with” China’s ruling Communist Party.

In the news release, he vowed to “demand that American companies act in accordance with American interests – which means preventing companies from sharing critical technologies with China and banning the sale of strategic assets like farmland to [Communist Party] members and their affiliates.”

Some politicians, led by Republicans, have expressed alarm at Chinese companies buying farmland in the U.S., though the overall rate of Chinese ownership remains very small and restricted in some states, according to the federal government.

On Monday, DeSantis also ripped the current pace of federal spending, pledging in the release to be “a new sheriff in town when it comes to spending” who would “not be afraid of using his veto pen.”

Aligning with a central tenet of his campaign for president, he also said that he would fight so-called “woke corporations” who he argues use diversity initiatives “to impose heavy-handed, left-wing edicts.”

In a point that evoked the enormous bank bailout after the 2008 financial crisis, DeSantis said in the release that in the event of another crisis, he would deny “those accountable of all golden parachutes and prevent the further accumulation of wealth to those already deemed too big to fail.”

Many details of the plan feature common points he discusses in front of voters on the campaign trail.

He regularly calls for expanding domestic energy production, reversing mandates to purchase battery-powered vehicles and ridding universities and colleges of “useless degrees.” (“Zombie studies” is the preferred example he mockingly uses.)

The plan singles out the Federal Reserve, with DeSantis saying he’d appoint a chairman “who will focus on maintaining a stable dollar” and “stable prices.”

And DeSantis’ plan ties his restrictive immigration policies to the economy, contending that a “fair labor market” is possible through “securing the border, enforcing our laws” and other changes, such as “limiting unskilled immigration.”

The plan promises some student loan reform and would push to “allow student loans to be discharged through bankruptcy like any other loan” while making “universities, not taxpayers, responsible for the loans their students accrue.”

Notably, DeSantis’ new economic plan does not include a specific pledge to end the IRS, which he has on multiple occasions indicated he would do, though in response to a question at Monday’s event, the governor said he “would be game for that.”

“You send me that, we’ll sign,” he said before moving on to another part of the question.

In Gardnerville, Nevada, last month, he pitched a plan “to get rid of the IRS and send it off into the sunset.”

Monday’s speech interrupted a recent flurry of intimate campaign stops — from a church in Albia, Iowa, to a diner in Derry, New Hampshire — intended to increase the governor’s presence in the early voting states as his campaign undergoes a reboot amid stagnant early poll numbers that show him trailing front-runner Donald Trump even as he remains the most popular candidate among the rest of the field.

DeSantis’s economic policy rollout came hours after New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu — who has not endorsed in the presidential race but has met with DeSantis during the campaign — told radio host Hugh Hewitt that he advised the Florida governor, “Don’t worry about the policy stuff.”

“We’ve got that,” Sununu said. “You’ve got to be about character, about looking people in the eye.”

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Who is Devon Archer? Former Hunter Biden business partner worked with him in Ukraine, China

Who is Devon Archer? Former Hunter Biden business partner worked with him in Ukraine, China
Who is Devon Archer? Former Hunter Biden business partner worked with him in Ukraine, China
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — Republicans hope Devon Archer can help them open up fresh lanes of inquiry in their ongoing investigation of President Joe Biden’s family — and they promoted his appearance before the House Oversight Committee on Monday, for closed-door testimony, as a major development in a probe that has thus far been heavy on accusations but light on evidence.

So, who is Devon Archer?

In the long-running drama that is Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings, Archer is an important recurring character whose relationships in Ukraine and China precipitated many of the younger Biden’s ill-fated endeavors in both countries.

The two first met through a mutual connection — Christopher Heinz, an heir to the food company and John Kerry’s stepson.

Archer and Heinz had been friends at Yale. In his memoir, “Beautiful Things,” Hunter Biden called Archer a “self-made, supermotivated former college lacrosse player with a disarming charm.”

In 2009, Hunter Biden and Archer co-founded Rosemont Seneca Partners, an advisory firm that provided “alternative investment opportunities and market guidance that seek to afford an absolute return through our global economic reach and expertise,” according to the group’s archived website.

In Ukraine, it was Archer who initially “raised my name for a possible board seat” at Burisma, a Ukrainian oil and gas conglomerate, Hunter Biden wrote in his memoir.

ABC News has reported that Hunter Biden and Archer, who also secured a seat for himself, raked in $166,666 payments each month for their work with the firm.

Archer also brokered deals for Rosemont Seneca in China, including its relationship with Jonathan Li — a Chinese businessman whom Hunter Biden introduced to his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, during a trip to Beijing in 2013, Hunter Biden wrote in his memoir.

In a 2019 interview with ABC News, Hunter Biden defended that brief meeting — which sparked criticism from Republicans when it became public.

“Whether I’m in New York, or whether I’m in Washington, D.C. … [and] a friend and a business associate is in the hotel, and my dad’s staying there — is it inappropriate for me to have coffee with him?” Hunter Biden asked rhetorically.

Archer’s relationship with President Biden has also attracted scrutiny from Republicans. A GOP-led Senate panel found in 2020 that Archer met with the elder Biden at the White House in 2014 shortly before he departed for a trip to Ukraine. (Archer and Hunter Biden told The New Yorker that the visit was arranged for Archer’s son, who at the time was working on a grade school project on the White House.)

A photo of Joe Biden golfing with his son and Archer in 2014 has prompted accusations that the then-vice president was more involved in Hunter Biden’s business endeavors than either party has led on.

Asked about that photo on the campaign trail in late 2019, Joe Biden bristled at the accusation and said “it’s not a conflict.”

Archer arrived on Capitol Hill on Monday with his own nagging legal travails. He was convicted on federal tax charges in 2018 as part of a conspiracy to defraud a Native American tribe. The conviction was overturned, reinstated and appealed. Archer is expected to report to prison in the coming months.

After several hours, Archer finished his closed-door interview on Capitol Hill on Monday and ignored questions from reporters as he left with his lawyer.

In a statement afterward to ABC News, an attorney for Archer said he had answered the committee’s questions “honestly and completely.”

“We are aware that all sides are claiming victory following Mr. Archer’s voluntary interview today. But all Devon Archer did was exactly what we said he would: show up and answer the questions put to him honestly and completely,” Matthew L. Schwartz said. “Mr. Archer shared the truth with the Committee, and we will leave to them and others to decide what to do with it.”

ABC News’ Lauren Peller contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Mar-a-Lago property manager does not enter plea in classified documents probe

Mar-a-Lago property manager does not enter plea in classified documents probe
Mar-a-Lago property manager does not enter plea in classified documents probe
Scott Olson/Getty Images

(MIAMI) — The newest defendant charged as part of the classified documents case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against former President Donald Trump made his initial appearance in Miami federal court Monday morning on the charges against him — but was not arraigned because he does not have local counsel.

Carlos De Oliveira, the Mar-a-Lago property manager charged in the superseding indictment last week, was ordered released on a $100,000 personal surety bond.

De Oliveira did not enter a plea Monday. He will be back on Thursday, Aug. 10, in Fort Pierce to be arraigned.

De Oliveira must also hand in his expired U.S. passport within 48 hours.

This marks the latest development in the high-profile case that is set to go to trial next May.

Carlos De Oliveira, a property manager at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, was newly charged in the case last week in a superseding indictment returned by a grand jury in the Southern District of Florida, adding on to the prior indictment filed against Trump and his longtime aide Walt Nauta in June.

As part of the new indictment, Trump, Nauta, and De Oliveira are all facing new charges, including that they allegedly took part in an effort to delete surveillance footage at Mar-a-Lago in order “to conceal information from the FBI and grand jury,” according to the indictment.

De Oliveira arrived at the federal courthouse in Miami for his arraignment Monday morning.

The superseding indictment adds two new obstruction counts based on allegations that Trump, Nauta and De Oliveira “attempted to delete surveillance video footage at The Mar-a-Lago Club in summer of 2022,” according to court filings.

De Oliveira allegedly told another employee that “the boss” wanted the server containing Mar-a-Lago security footage deleted, and asked how long the footage was kept, according to the indictment.

“What are we going to do?” he allegedly said.

The exchange occurred after a subpoena for security footage had already been sent to Trump’s attorney, the indictment alleges.

De Oliveira was also added to the original obstruction conspiracy charge against Trump and Nauta, and is also charged with making false statements and representations stemming from a voluntary interview with the FBI on Jan. 13, 2023.

During that interview, De Oliveira repeatedly answered “no” when asked if he was part of any group involved in helping move and unload boxes at Mar-a-Lago — but the indictment now identifies De Oliveira “as the person who helped Nauta move approximately 30 boxes from Trump’s residence to the Storage Room on June 2, 2022,” according to a court filing.

The indictment also identifies De Oliveira as the one of the “others” mentioned in the original indictment who “loaded several of Trump’s boxes along with other items on aircraft that flew Trump and his family north for the summer.”

The indictment also lays out an alleged effort to secure De Oliveira’s “loyalty.” Just over two weeks after the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, according to the indictment, Trump called De Oliveira and told him that he would get him an attorney.

That same day, Nauta called an unnamed Mar-a-Lago employee and said words to the effect of, “someone just wanted to make sure Carlos is good,” the indictment alleges.

The employee told Nauta that De Oliveira “was loyal,” according to the indictment, and that he “would not do anything to affect his relationship with Trump.”

In addition, the new indictment charges Trump with allegedly possessing the classified document that he was previously heard discussing on an audio recording made during a July 21, 2021, meeting at his Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club.

In June, Trump pleaded not guilty to 37 criminal counts related to his handling of classified materials, after prosecutors said he repeatedly refused to return hundreds of documents containing classified information ranging from U.S. nuclear secrets to the nation’s defense capabilities. He has denied all charges and denounced the probe as a political witch hunt. Nauta also pleaded not guilty to related charges.

Trump has pushed back against the latest allegations, writing in a post on Truth Social that the security tapes “were not deleted” and were “voluntarily handed over.”

In a court filing, the special counsel’s team said that the superseding indictment “should not disturb” the scheduled start of the trail, which is currently set for May 2024.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Mar-a-Lago property manager to be arraigned in special counsel’s classified documents probe

Mar-a-Lago property manager does not enter plea in classified documents probe
Mar-a-Lago property manager does not enter plea in classified documents probe
Scott Olson/Getty Images

(MIAMI) — The newest defendant to be charged as part of the classified documents case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against former President Donald Trump is scheduled to appear in court Monday morning, marking the latest development in the high-profile case that is set to go to trial next May.

Carlos De Oliveira, a property manager at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, was newly charged in the case last week in a superseding indictment returned by a grand jury in the Southern District of Florida, adding on to the prior indictment filed against Trump and his longtime aide Walt Nauta in June.

As part of the new indictment, Trump, Nauta, and De Oliveira are all facing new charges, including that they allegedly took part in an effort to delete surveillance footage at Mar-a-Lago in order “to conceal information from the FBI and grand jury,” according to the indictment.

De Oliveira has been summoned to appear in Miami federal court for his arraignment on Monday morning.

The superseding indictment adds two new obstruction counts based on allegations that Trump, Nauta and De Oliveira “attempted to delete surveillance video footage at The Mar-a-Lago Club in summer of 2022,” according to court filings.

De Oliveira allegedly told another employee that “the boss” wanted the server containing Mar-a-Lago security footage deleted, and asked how long the footage was kept, according to the indictment.

“What are we going to do?” he allegedly said.

The exchange occurred after a subpoena for security footage had already been sent to Trump’s attorney, the indictment alleges.

De Oliveira was also added to the original obstruction conspiracy charge against Trump and Nauta, and is also charged with making false statements and representations stemming from a voluntary interview with the FBI on Jan. 13, 2023.

During that interview, De Oliveira repeatedly answered “no” when asked if he was part of any group involved in helping move and unload boxes at Mar-a-Lago — but the indictment now identifies De Oliveira “as the person who helped Nauta move approximately 30 boxes from Trump’s residence to the Storage Room on June 2, 2022,” according to a court filing.

The indictment also identifies De Oliveira as the one of the “others” mentioned in the original indictment who “loaded several of Trump’s boxes along with other items on aircraft that flew Trump and his family north for the summer.”

The indictment also lays out an alleged effort to secure De Oliveira’s “loyalty.” Just over two weeks after the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, according to the indictment, Trump called De Oliveira and told him that he would get him an attorney.

That same day, Nauta called an unnamed Mar-a-Lago employee and said words to the effect of, “someone just wanted to make sure Carlos is good,” the indictment alleges.

The employee told Nauta that De Oliveira “was loyal,” according to the indictment, and that he “would not do anything to affect his relationship with Trump.”

In addition, the new indictment charges Trump with allegedly possessing the classified document that he was previously heard discussing on an audio recording made during a July 21, 2021, meeting at his Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club.

In June, Trump pleaded not guilty to 37 criminal counts related to his handling of classified materials, after prosecutors said he repeatedly refused to return hundreds of documents containing classified information ranging from U.S. nuclear secrets to the nation’s defense capabilities. He has denied all charges and denounced the probe as a political witch hunt. Nauta also pleaded not guilty to related charges.

Trump has pushed back against the latest allegations, writing in a post on Truth Social that the security tapes “were not deleted” and were “voluntarily handed over.”

In a court filing, the special counsel’s team said that the superseding indictment “should not disturb” the scheduled start of the trail, which is currently set for May 2024.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Harris raises alarm about abortion restrictions but has ‘faith in the people of America’

Harris raises alarm about abortion restrictions but has ‘faith in the people of America’
Harris raises alarm about abortion restrictions but has ‘faith in the people of America’
ABC News

(NEW YORK) — Vice President Kamala Harris called out leaders in several states who she says have been diminishing the reproductive rights of women after last year’s Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, but she expressed some hope that the American public will push back.

Harris sat down with ABC News Live Prime anchor Linsey Davis for an interview while visiting Iowa Friday where she spoke about the six-week abortion ban that the state’s Republican governor recently signed into law, currently blocked by an Iowa judge.

Fifteen states have ceased nearly all abortion services.

Harris said she was concerned about what was going on in the country and criticized the state leaders for, she says, undermining women’s health with these restrictions.

“There’s something underlying this approach that states like Iowa have taken that really suggests that they’re– that they don’t trust women to be able to know what’s in their best interests and make the decision accordingly,” the vice president said.

Harris said that restrictions on reproductive health services have led to serious medical emergencies for millions of American women. She noted the anecdote of a woman who suffered a miscarriage and was rejected by an emergency room due to her state’s abortion laws.

“She went to the emergency room while she was having a miscarriage, denied care. She went back, denied care. Only when she contracted sepsis did they give her care. So this is what’s happening in real time in our country,” Harris said.

“I think on this issue, it is critically important that we understand this is not some intellectual debate,” she added. “Every day in America, there are people suffering, silently suffering in many cases.”

Republican leaders, like Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds, have touted their restrictive laws as they implement the Supreme Court’s decision.

“We have a responsibility not only to protect the unborn in law, but to change the destructive culture of abortion that still exists in a post-Roe world,” Reynolds said at the signing of the state’s six-week abortion ban two weeks ago.

However, Harris noted that the American people have pushed back at the ballot box since the Supreme Court decision, voting against the restrictions and leaders who support them.

“So I am concerned about what’s been happening, but I also have faith in the people of America,” she said.

Harris encouraged Americans to get out and vote if they are concerned about more reproductive health restrictions and said she has hope that the previous protections on abortions can be restored.

“Congress has the ability to put back in place the protections that the Supreme Court took away,” she said. “And President Joe Biden has been very clear, when that happens, he will sign it.”

Harris, the first female Black and South Asian vice president, once again criticized controversial Black history standards unanimously approved by Florida’s board of education. Among the changes approved was a section of “benchmark clarifications,” and among those was one that states “instruction includes how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.”

Harris said that notion was “ridiculous” and reiterated there should be no “ideological debate” over the truth about slavery in this country.

“I think that this is just a matter of whether one chooses to speak fact and truth or not,” Harris said. “I don’t think that this is subject to any ideological debate to say that people who are enslaved do not benefit from slavery, period.”

“There are so-called leaders, extremists, who are attempting to require in our nation an unnecessary debate, with the intention, I believe, to try and divide us as Americans. Stop. Stop,” she added.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has called Harris’ criticism of the proposed curriculum “outrageous,” and has defended the instruction despite distancing himself from it.

“I wasn’t involved in it,” he said last week. “But I think what they’re doing is, I think that they’re probably going to show some of the folks that eventually parlayed being a blacksmith into doing things later in life. But the reality is, all of that is rooted in whatever is factual,” adding, “These were scholars that put that together. It was not anything that was done politically.”

DeSantis doubled down on his pushback on Friday at the Lincoln Dinner in Iowa and accused Harris of “coming down to Florida trying to create a phony narrative.”

Harris also slammed Republican leaders this month over the ongoing migrant crisis and called the policies of some governors shipping migrants by the busload to other cities and states “inhumane, outrageous and un-American.”

She reiterated her criticism noting that these families have already suffered hardships in their home countries and during their travels north.

“Human beings should not be treated as pawns in a political game,” she said.

“One very clear solution, a very significant solution has been in front of us for years now. We need to pass immigration reform,” Harris added.

Watch Linsey Davis’ full interview with Vice President Kamala Harris on ABC News Live Prime, Monday, July 31, at 7 p.m. ET.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Trump team launching legal defense fund to help pay legal bills

Trump team launching legal defense fund to help pay legal bills
Trump team launching legal defense fund to help pay legal bills
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — Former President Donald Trump’s team is launching a legal defense fund aimed at helping to handle the onslaught of legal bills the former president and his allies face as the investigations into him mount, sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.

On Sunday, ABC News reported that a super PAC supporting Trump spent more than $40 million on legal costs in the first half of 2023 to defend Trump, his advisers and others, sources familiar with a filing detailing the costs told ABC.

The filing from the Save America PAC is expected to be released on Monday.

For now, the legal fund is not meant to cover Trump’s own bills, the sources said.

The legal defense fund will be called the Patriot Legal Defense Fund Inc., the sources said. It is expected to be led by Michael Glassner, who has previously served in multiple senior roles on Trump’s 2016 and 2020 campaigns.

Lynne Patton, who has been a close aide to Trump at both the Trump Organization and in Trump’s administration, will also be involved in the fund.

A Trump spokesperson provided a statement about the reasons for the defense fund.

“[A]nd to protect these innocent people from financial ruin and prevent their lives from being completely destroyed, a new legal defense fund will help pay for their legal fees to ensure they have representation against unlawful harassment,” the statement read.

News of the new pact was first reported by the New York Times.

Mounting legal costs come as Trump faces mounting legal troubles, including a superseding indictment handed up last week by a federal grand jury in special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Trump’s handling of classified documents after leaving office.

The superseding indictment charges Trump and two others — Carlos De Oliveira, head of maintenance at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, and Trump aide Walt Nauta — with two obstruction counts based on allegations that the defendants attempted to delete surveillance video footage at Mar-a-Lago in the summer of 2022.

In June, Trump pleaded not guilty to 37 criminal counts related to his handling of classified materials, after prosecutors said he repeatedly refused to return hundreds of documents containing classified information ranging from U.S. nuclear secrets to the nation’s defense capabilities. He has denied all charges and denounced the probe as a political witch hunt. Nauta, who was also previously charged, also pleaded not guilty. Neither of them has pleaded to the new charges yet.

De Oliveira is set to appear in court on Monday.

Trump separately faces a 34-count indictment in New York state court related to hush money paid to adult film actress Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. He has pleaded not guilty in that case.

He is also a target of Smith’s investigation into the events surrounding Jan. 6 and his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss.

He has denied wrongdoing and repeatedly claimed political persecution. At a campaign stop in Erie, Pennsylvania, on Saturday, he said, “These are ridiculous indictments, and all they’re doing is hoping for massive election interference.”

Trump and his allies have consistently pushed supporters to donate to Save America, often using false claims about the 2020 election and soliciting donations to rebuke the multiple investigations into the former president, his business dealings and his actions on Jan. 6.

The Save America super PAC has, in the past, reported taking in tens of millions of dollars and has helped cover legal bills for either Trump or his allies.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Trump PAC spent more than $40M on legal bills this year as his charges mount: Sources

Trump PAC spent more than M on legal bills this year as his charges mount: Sources
Trump PAC spent more than M on legal bills this year as his charges mount: Sources
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — A political group that supports Donald Trump spent more than $40 million on legal costs in the first half of 2023 to defend the former president, his advisers and others, sources familiar with a filing detailing the costs confirmed to ABC News.

That number spent by the Save America leadership PAC, Trump’s main fundraising arm, was first reported by The Washington Post.

The financial filing is expected to be released Monday.

The mounting costs come as Trump faces mounting legal troubles, including a superseding indictment handed up from a federal grand jury via special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Trump’s allegedly improper retention of classified documents after leaving office.

The superseding indictment, released publicly last week, charges Trump and two others — Carlos De Oliveira, head of maintenance at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, and Trump aide Walt Nauta — with two obstruction counts based on allegations that the defendants attempted to delete surveillance video footage at Mar-a-Lago in the summer of 2022.

Trump previously faced a sweeping, 37-count federal indictment to which he pleaded not guilty. Nauta, who was also previously charged, also pleaded not guilty. Neither of them has pleaded to the new charges yet.

De Oliveira is set to appear in court on Monday.

Trump separately faces a 34-count indictment in New York state court, out of Manhattan, related to hush money paid to adult film actress Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. He has pleaded not guilty in that case.

He is also a target of Smith’s investigation into the events around Jan. 6 and his push to overturn his 2020 election loss.

He has denied wrongdoing and repeatedly claimed political persecution. At a campaign stop in Erie, Pennsylvania, on Saturday, he said, “These are ridiculous indictments and all they’re doing is hoping for massive election interference.”

Trump and his allies have consistently pushed supporters to donate to Save America, often using false claims about the 2020 election and soliciting donations to rebuke the multiple investigations into the former president, his business dealings and his actions on Jan. 6.

The leadership PAC has, in the past, reported raking in tens of millions of dollars and has helped cover legal bills for either Trump or his allies.

In a statement, a Trump campaign spokesperson argued that the payments were necessary.

“The weaponized Department of Justice has continued to go after innocent Americans because they worked for President Trump and they know they have no legitimate case,” the spokesperson said. “In order to combat these heinous actions by Joe Biden’s cronies and to protect these innocent people from financial ruin and prevent their lives from being completely destroyed, the leadership PAC contributed to their legal fees to ensure they have representation against unlawful harassment.”

Smith, the independent prosecutor probing Trump, has defended his work.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is the most popular challenger to Trump in the Republican primary, though he notably trails in early polls, criticized the PAC’s spending on Trump’s bills rather than on Democrats.

“Trump has spent over $60 million this year on two things: falsely attacking Ron DeSantis and paying his own legal fees, not a cent on defeating Joe Biden,” DeSantis campaign spokesman Andrew Romero said in a statement. “Governor DeSantis’ sole focus, by contrast, has been campaigning for this country’s future, defeating Biden, and reversing the decline of America.”

In response, Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung said, in part, “Only desperate idiots and un-American morons would take the position the DeSantis team has taken.”

The war of words continued on Sunday afternoon as DeSantis told ABC News in New Hampshire, pushing back on Trump, “If he drained the swamp like he promised, you know, he probably wouldn’t be in the mess that he’s in right now.”

ABC News’ Hannah Demissie, Lalee Ibssa, Soo Rin Kim and Will McDuffie contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Uvalde native Matthew McConaughey on finding real gun violence solutions and whether he’d run for office

Uvalde native Matthew McConaughey on finding real gun violence solutions and whether he’d run for office
Uvalde native Matthew McConaughey on finding real gun violence solutions and whether he’d run for office
ABC News

(WASHINGTON) — A little more than a year after a gunman at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, killed 19 children and two teachers, actor Matthew McConaughey hopes to make schools safer through his Greenlights Grant Initiative.

In an interview with ABC “This Week” co-anchor Jonathan Karl on Sunday, McConaughey, a Uvalde native, reflected on his experience in the weeks following the massacre, a period that saw him visit both his hometown and the White House — and he shared his thoughts on how people with differing values can find consensus on policies to reduce gun violence.

“My wife was out of the country,” McConaughey said, recalling the aftermath of the shooting. “She heard about the news, immediately writes me and says, ‘We got to go down there.’ She cut her trip short, flew in. We packed up and headed out.”

McConaughey and his wife, Camila, met the representative for Uvalde, Republican Rep. Tony Gonzales, who introduced them to relatives of the dead, McConaughey said.

“We had families invite us in to come for the first viewing of their child. And that, to us, felt like we were trespassing,” McConaughey said. “But the mother and father go, ‘No, please come in.’ And when we left there, the consensus was, ‘Can you help make their lives matter?’ So that led to us ending up in D.C.”

Not long after McConaughey’s visit to the White House, in June 2022, Congress passed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA), the first major piece of gun legislation enacted into law in decades.

The bill approved funding for schools to address gun violence by increasing mental health support for students, enhancing background checks and supporting the implementation of “red flag” laws to temporarily prevent access to weapons for people who could be a danger to themselves or others.

But while the BSCA is “already working in some ways,” there are also “billions of dollars that are still left to be spent,” McConaughey said.

“Billions of dollars for school safety,” Karl emphasized. “Great. That’s awesome. And then you find out … a year later and the money hasn’t gone out yet. Most of it hasn’t.”

In fact, McConaughey said, Rep. Gonzales told him and his wife that some three months after the Uvalde shooting, only 12 schools in the area had applied for government funding but zero of them had been awarded the money.

“What are we doing?” McConaughey said, adding, “That’s a 0[%] success rate. One, way too few applications. No. 2, the 12 applications, we went 0-for-12?”

“The government admits that it shouldn’t be this complicated,” he said. (Government agencies have, more recently, announced hundreds of millions of dollars in grants to numerous recipients, including for mental health and public safety support.)

McConaughey hopes his work with his wife will be helpful, too.

“You got 14,000 something schools. This grant initiative is going to connect those districts to those billions of dollars that’s there, available, and wants to be used to make our kids safe,” he said.

More broadly, Karl asked McConaughey if he believes the way gun policy debates are framed becomes an obstacle to making change.

“A lot of people that consider themselves strong Second Amendment [supporters], they think any measure is a measure towards confiscating all guns. So how do you speak to those people?” Karl asked.

McConaughey said his solution starts simple.

“I’d change the word from [gun] ‘control’ to ‘responsibility,'” he said.

“No one wants to be controlled,” he continued. “But responsibility is still something that we can all go, ‘Yeah, I’ll take responsibility.’ … The Second Amendment defenders could talk responsibility. They could look you in the eye and talk responsibility with someone from the other side of the aisle.”

Karl noted polling that shows broad support for further regulations, such as universal background checks and waiting periods for firearm purchases — “yet none of those things have been done.”

McConaughey said he believes that the majority public view on the issue is not being represented by politicians right now. “That math should add up. And right now, it doesn’t,” he said.

“Do you have advice to, particularly Democrats on this issue … do you have any advice on how they can speak?” Karl asked.

“There’s a whole lot of Americans that need you to at least meet them where they are and what they’re understanding and how they’ve grown up on this issue with guns in their lives and how they, most of them, do handle them responsibly,” McConaughey said. “So don’t cast them down as being archaic or cavemen.”

Polarization can be a powerful force, McConaughey acknowledged, but so can compromise.

“We love the wreck. It’s entertainment,” he said, adding, “We don’t love to watch health as much as. We like to watch disease. These two extremes have the microphone.”

In light of McConaughey’s increasingly outspoken views on gun policy and reducing gun violence, Karl asked if he could ever see himself seeking elected office. “Or can you do more outside? Like what you’re doing here.”

“There’s a great question that I’m still answering,” McConaughey said. “And as of right now, to be a private citizen with my wife and to come up with an idea like the Greenlights Grant Initiative — to work with the government publicly to help them, not doing the job for them, helping them pull off what they set out to do in the first place — there is an argument that that’s more useful, what I’m doing right now, in a small way.”

“But to do the kind of big change?” Karl followed up.

“Well, to do the big change … I’d have to be convinced that that’s a category that I could be quite useful in,” McConaughey said. “And it’s something that I think about all the time.”

“You do?” Karl said.

Of course, McConaughey said: “Starting as the man I am, as a concerned father, as a husband, as a person who believes in people, as a Texan, as an American is like, man, come on, I believe in us.”

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Biden would never consider pardoning son Hunter, who is under federal investigation: Dem lawmaker

Biden would never consider pardoning son Hunter, who is under federal investigation: Dem lawmaker
Biden would never consider pardoning son Hunter, who is under federal investigation: Dem lawmaker
ABC News

(WASHINGTON) — Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., said Sunday that President Joe Biden would never consider a pardon for his son Hunter Biden after a plea deal that the younger Biden agreed to on tax and gun charges fell apart last week.

“I don’t think there’s any chance that President Biden is going to do that, unlike his predecessor, who pardoned all of his friends and anyone who had any access to him,” Goldman told ABC “This Week” co-anchor Jonathan Karl, referring to former President Donald Trump. (Trump has defended his grants of clemency, claiming some people were mistreated.)

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said last week the president would not consider a pardon, but the president himself has not said anything on the matter.

On “This Week,” Goldman defended how the White House has handled the ongoing federal investigation into Hunter Biden, who last week pleaded not guilty to tax charges.

“President Biden has restored the integrity of the Department of Justice,” Goldman said. “And I think you see that in this case, where he kept on, and [Attorney General] Merrick Garland kept on, a Trump-appointed U.S. attorney to investigate the president’s son — if there is not an indication of the independence of the Department of Justice beyond that, I don’t know what we could look for.”

Hunter Biden previously agreed to a deal with prosecutors in which he would have pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor tax charges and enter into a pretrial diversion program to help him avoid prosecution on a separate felony gun charge.

However, the arrangement fell apart — for now — during a hearing in Delaware on Wednesday when U.S. District Court Judge Maryellen Noreika pressed prosecutors and Hunter Biden’s attorneys over some aspects of their agreement, including linking the prospective tax plea to the gun charge and whether or not a provision in the deal would grant Hunter Biden broader immunity going forward even as prosecutors acknowledged he is still under investigation.

Noreika ultimately deferred the plea deal, which she called “atypical” and “not straightforward.”

The two sides are now negotiating.

Goldman, who served as House Democrats’ majority counsel during Trump’s first impeachment, contended on “This Week” that the language in the deal protecting Hunter Biden from future prosecution was fueled by concerns from his attorneys at the prospect of Trump returning to the White House and targeting him.

“The fact of the matter is that this is a Trump-appointed U.S. attorney and Trump-appointed judge, this is a very independent and thorough investigation,” he said. “And I think that whatever happens in the Hunter Biden case, we can rest assured that it was done based solely on the facts and the evidence, and that there was nothing else to it.”

Pressed by Karl on if he thought the immunity provision in the deal was “too broad,” Goldman insisted otherwise.

“That’s fairly typical and, oftentimes, prosecutors and defense lawyers go back and forth about what degree of immunity a defendant will get,” he said.

And despite withering criticism from Republicans who claim Hunter Biden received a favorable deal because of who he is — with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy saying last week that “there shouldn’t be two justice systems in America” — Goldman said that “this is a fairly typical process.”

Separately, Goldman also hammered Trump over last week’s superseding indictment adding charges onto the former president’s previous federal indictment over his handling of government secrets while out of office.

The new allegations include a claim that he pushed for security footage from Mar-a-Lago to be deleted after that footage was subpoenaed.

“It demonstrates Donald Trump’s knowledge of what his conduct was and how wrong it was, and that he was trying to obstruct the investigation that he knew was ongoing,” Goldman said. “That is quintessential consciousness of guilt.”

Trump has denied any wrongdoing and cast the charges against him as politically motivated.

He pleaded not guilty to the original federal indictment but has not yet pleaded to the superseding indictment.

“I think the most important thing to take away is that Donald Trump does not believe that the law applies to him,” Goldman argued on Sunday. “He simply believes he’s above the law and that he can do whatever he wants.”

ABC News’ Lucien Bruggeman contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

GOP shouldn’t move forward with Biden impeachment probe unless there’s a conviction: Sununu

GOP shouldn’t move forward with Biden impeachment probe unless there’s a conviction: Sununu
GOP shouldn’t move forward with Biden impeachment probe unless there’s a conviction: Sununu
Jemal Countess/Getty Images for TIME

(WASHINGTON) — While there are “very real” and “incredibly serious” allegations against President Joe Biden’s family, investigations into them must “play out in court” before congressional Republicans move forward with any impeachment-related proceedings, New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu argued on Sunday.

“We have to find out what all the evidence is,” Sununu said in an appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” in a break with a push by others in his party, such as House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

“If found guilty, yes, I think Congress should definitely take something up,” Sununu said.

“I think they’re really, really far from really figuring out what the realities there are,” he continued. “But those are very serious accusations that have to be followed up, for sure.”

Last week, a plea deal struck between federal prosecutors and the president’s son Hunter Biden fell apart — at least temporarily — leading Hunter Biden to plead not guilty to tax charges. Prosecutors said in court during the plea deal hearing that their investigation of Hunter Biden was ongoing.

Separately, GOP lawmakers have highlighted an unverified FBI source report alleging that, years ago, a Ukrainian oligarch paid Joe and Hunter Biden $10 million, apparently in return for favors.

The White House adamantly denies this, saying it was investigated under the Trump administration and “debunked.” Both the president and his aides have repeatedly said he didn’t get involved in his son’s business dealings.

On “This Week,” Sununu suggested that Republicans should shift their focus to much more pressing issues in the “everyday lives of Americans,” such as concerns about the border and the “opioid crisis.”

“I’d rather have the focus on those issues. And if the guilty verdict comes out of the Bidens and comes to bear, they can take it up at the appropriate time,” Sununu said.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.