Trump’s TikTok ban reversal comes after meeting megadonor who has stake in TikTok

Trump’s TikTok ban reversal comes after meeting megadonor who has stake in TikTok
Trump’s TikTok ban reversal comes after meeting megadonor who has stake in TikTok
Matt Cardy/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — As Donald Trump reverses his position on potentially banning TikTok ahead of an expected House vote this week on legislation that could lead to it being blocked in the U.S., the former president has been rebuilding his relationship with a GOP megadonor who reportedly has a major financial stake in the popular social media platform.

Trump met with the donor, hedge fund manager Jeff Yass, earlier this month at a Club for Growth donor retreat in Palm Beach, Florida, on March 1.

The Club for Growth, a conservative political organization to which Yass has donated millions, has opposed anti-TikTok efforts.

The group’s president last year wrote: “Giving the government the power to ban apps and pick and choose between competing apps is a huge restriction on phone freedom.”

The former president, who had originally spearheaded efforts to ban TikTok during his time in the White House, reversed his stance last week, posting on his own social media platform that getting rid of TikTok would benefit Facebook and that he doesn’t want that to happen, suggesting Facebook is a bigger problem for the country.

“I don’t want Facebook … doing better. They are a true Enemy of the People!” he wrote.

The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for more information about what motivated Trump’s changing view, and it’s not yet known what he and Yass discussed in their March 1 meeting.

But speaking at the Club for Growth retreat, Trump said Yass, in addition to Club for Growth President David McIntosh, had called him to invite him to the event, according to a video clip from that night obtained by ABC News.

Yass, who did not respond to a request for comment on Monday, owns a significant stake in in TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance, The Wall Street Journal reported last year.

“I’ve supported libertarian and free market principles my entire adult life,” Yass told the Journal then. “TikTok is about free speech and innovation, the epitome of libertarian and free market ideals. The idea of banning TikTok is an anathema to everything I believe.”

ByteDance has long been under scrutiny in the U.S. over concerns that TikTok’s data could be accessed by the Chinese government, though TikTok has repeatedly denied sharing U.S. user data with the Chinese government or receiving a request along those lines.

Under the legislation currently being considered in Congress, ByteDance would be forced to sell TikTok to an American company for the social media platform to remain operating in the United States.

Last week, a House panel unanimously voted to send the bill to the floor for a full vote, with the legislation now set to be debated and voted on this week, and Biden has said he will sign the bill if Congress passes it.

It’s not yet known what impact, if any, Trump’s comments on the TikTok ban will have on lawmakers’ views on the bill, and the future of the proposal in the Senate remains unclear as well.

On Monday morning on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Trump spoke out against the potential TikTok ban, saying he believes TikTok is a national security risk because of its Chinese ties but that there are other apps that are risks as well — and again saying he doesn’t want Facebook to benefit.

At the same time, Trump bragged that he could have banned TikTok as president if he wanted to but that Congress wouldn’t let him.

While in the White House, Trump signed an order calling on ByteDance to divest from TikTok’s U.S. operations, but it was later blocked in court.

TikTok has defended itself by citing Project Texas, an initiative that the company said keeps all U.S. user data on servers within the country — “outside the reach or influence of any foreign government.”

The company also blasted the legislation in the House, saying in a statement: “This legislation will trample the First Amendment rights of 170 million Americans and deprive 5 million small businesses of a platform they rely on to grow and create jobs.”

Trump’s shifting views on TikTok coincide with his mended relationship with Yass — as well as with Yass’ biggest beneficiary, the Club for Growth — who had been on thin ice with the former president in recent years, especially after the Club for Growth clashed with Trump over multiple endorsements during the 2022 midterms.

And Yass, who was opposed to Trump earlier in the 2016 cycle but still bankrolled Club for Growth after the group supported Trump as the GOP’s presumptive nominee, said in September 2022 that he was considering supporting Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in the 2024 nominating race, not Trump.

In 2023, Yass donated millions of dollars to a super PAC supporting Vivek Ramaswamy’s presidential candidacy. Both Ramaswamy and DeSantis ended their campaigns in January.

At the Club for Growth’s donor retreat earlier this month, Trump declared he was growing closer with Yass and McIntosh, saying, “We’re back in love.” That signals potentially significant support from the group in the coming months ahead of the November general election.

Politico reported on Saturday that Trump’s former senior aide Kellyanne Conway has also been hired by Club for Growth in its defense of TikTok.

A source familiar confirms to ABC News that Conway, who works as a pollster, has been looking at data on the “public appetite for an outright ban,” but not divestment.

In a statement to Politico, in part, Conway said, “Why would the GOP wish to be seen as the party of ‘bans’?” She pointed the finger at the Biden administration, saying they pushed for bans on things like menthol cigarettes.

ABC News’ Adam Carlson and Max Zahn contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Biden hits back after Trump floats ‘cutting’ Social Security to curb the national debt

Biden hits back after Trump floats ‘cutting’ Social Security to curb the national debt
Biden hits back after Trump floats ‘cutting’ Social Security to curb the national debt
Win McNamee/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — President Joe Biden and his reelection campaign have seized on former President Donald Trump, in an interview Monday on CNBC, appearing to float “cutting” entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare in a potential second term in order to curb the tens of trillions of dollars in national debt. 

Responding to his rival’s comments from his personal X account, Biden wrote, “Not on my watch.” 

His campaign, which is in the early stages of the lengthy general election fight with Trump, has been highlighting the former president’s exchange with CNBC anchor Joe Kernen, using clips of the interview on social media to argue Trump — who also raised the prospect of overhauling how entitlements are managed — would threaten retirement programs in the White House. 

The Trump campaign has pushed back, saying his words are being distorted. 

“Have you changed your outlook on how to handle entitlements — Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid? Mr. President, it seems like something has to be done or else we are going to be stuck at 120% of debt to [gross domestic product] forever,” Kernan said to Trump in the interview. 

So first of all, there is a lot you can do in terms of entitlements, in terms of cutting — and in terms of also, the theft and the bad management of entitlements, tremendous bad management of entitlements,” Trump replied. 

“There’s tremendous amounts of things and numbers of things you can do, so I don’t necessarily agree with the statement,” he said. “I know that they’re going to end up weakening Social Security because the country is weak.” 

On social media, Trump’s campaign has attacked the Biden campaign for cutting clips from Trump’s answer rather than the longer exchange. 

“If you losers didn’t cut his answer short, you would know President Trump was talking about cutting waste,” reads one post from a Trump campaign account. 

On the 2024 campaign trail, Trump promised to protect the retirement programs while working to sink the campaigns of Republican challengers Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, who both floated reforms to the programs as a way to reduce the national deficit before the two separately dropped out. 

“Cut waste, fraud and abuse everywhere that we can find it and there’s plenty of it,” Trump said in a campaign video from January 2023. “But do not cut the benefits our seniors worked for and paid for their entire lives. Save Social Security, don’t destroy it.” 

At a rally earlier this month in Richmond, Virginia, Trump contended it was Biden who would threaten the programs, telling supporters, ” I will not let him destroy Social Security” and “I will not let him crash Medicare.” 

The White House weighed in on Trump’s comments on Monday as well, saying they align with his budget proposals while he was president, despite Trump’s claims of misrepresentation. 

Biden on Monday unveiled his own budget proposal for the coming fiscal year. Though the plan is unlikely to influence the divided Congress, it serves as a way for Biden to highlight election year priorities. 

He calls for raising Medicare tax rates from 3.8% to 5% for those with incomes over $400,000 while requiring billionaires pay a 25% minimum tax, among other budget items Republicans were quick to slam as excessive. 

Congress will eventually need to act on Social Security, which 65 million Americans currently rely on, as it faces a long-term funding shortfall. But, so far, the parties can’t agree on solutions, as lawmakers also remain engaged in long-term battles over government spending and the debt ceiling. 

“Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block,” Biden said in his State of the Union speech last week. “If anyone here tries to cut Social Security or Medicare or raise the retirement age, I will stop you.” 

He added: “I’ll protect and strengthen Social Security and make the wealthy pay their fair share.” 

ABC News’ Alexandra Hutlzer contributed to this report. 

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Trump asks judge to delay hush money trial while Supreme Court weighs his immunity claim

Trump asks judge to delay hush money trial while Supreme Court weighs his immunity claim
Trump asks judge to delay hush money trial while Supreme Court weighs his immunity claim
Win McNamee/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — Attorneys for former President Donald Trump on Monday asked the judge overseeing his hush money case in New York to delay the trial, currently scheduled to begin March 25, while the U.S. Supreme Court weighs Trump’s argument that he is immune from prosecution for conduct that occurred while he was in office. 

Trump has not argued the charges should be dropped over the immunity claim, but that the trial be put off and prosecutors be precluded from introducing evidence. 

“President Trump respectfully submits that an adjournment of the trial is appropriate to await further guidance from the Supreme Court, which should facilitate the appropriate application of the presidential immunity doctrine in this case to the evidence the People intend to offer at trial,” defense attorney Todd Blanche wrote in Monday’s court filing. 

The Supreme Court announced last month that it will hear oral arguments in April on whether Trump can claim sweeping presidential immunity for actions taken while in office, after Trump asked the court to decide the matter in the face of special counsel Jack Smith’s federal election interference case against him. 

Trump last April pleaded not guilty to a 34-count indictment charging him with falsifying business records in connection with a hush money payment his then-attorney Michael Cohen made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels just days before the 2016 presidential election. 

In their motion filed Monday, Trump’s lawyers said prosecutors plan to introduce documents and testimony relating to a time period when Trump was in office, including statements posted to Twitter about Cohen. 

“The People’s recent proffer implicates presidential immunity because President Trump was President of the United States at the time of those actions in 2018. He made at least some of the 2018 statements at issue — and potentially all of them, though it is hard to be sure in light of the People’s vague in limine description — in his official capacity as the nation’s Chief Executive,” the defense motion said. 

The Manhattan district attorney’s office declined when contacted by ABC News. 

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

What to know about Biden’s 2025 budget proposal

What to know about Biden’s 2025 budget proposal
What to know about Biden’s 2025 budget proposal
Megan Varner/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — President Joe Biden on Monday released his budget for fiscal year 2025, highlighting his efforts to help middle-class Americans get a leg up as the general election kicks off. 

The proposals include restoring the expanded Child Tax Credit, bolstering Medicare drug pricing negotiations, national paid family leave programs, affordable housing and more. 

The White House argued that Biden’s budget would cut the deficit by $3 trillion over the next 10 years, primarily through adjustments to the tax code targeting the ultra-wealthy and cutting to “wasteful subsidies.” 

The budget release comes days after Biden’s State of the Union address, a campaign-style speech in which he focused on contrasting his vision for the country with that of Republicans — namely his 2024 rival Donald Trump. 

“The budget details the president’s vision to protect and build on this progress and deliver on the agenda laid out in his State of the Union by lowering costs for families growing the economy from the middle out and bottom up by investing in all America to make sure the middle class has a fair shot and we leave no one behind,” Shalanda Young, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, said in a call with reporters. 

The policies, however, have little path forward in the currently divided Congress. Lawmakers are responsible for setting the budget, and are still working to fund some key agencies through the rest of this fiscal year. 

House Republican leadership, including Speaker Mike Johnson, Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Majority Whip Tom Emmer and Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik, quickly dismissed the plan. 

“House Republicans reject Biden’s misguided budget proposal and have taken action to steer our nation back to a path of fiscal sanity,” they said in a joint statement, adding: “The House’s budget plan for the next fiscal year, preceding the President’s proposal, reflects the values of hardworking Americans who know that in tough economic times, fiscal discipline is non-negotiable. House Republicans understand the American people expect and deserve nothing less from their government.” 

Asked what in the budget may actually be achievable, the White House declined to get into specifics but said it welcomed working with Republicans on these issues. 

“We’re going to work across the aisle in good faith to try and get these things done for the American people,” deputy press secretary Olivia Dalton told reporters aboard Air Force One as Biden traveled to New Hampshire, where he will deliver remarks on the economy. “We think that the president’s agenda is incredibly popular, and we encourage Republicans to join us.” 

Here is a closer look at what is included in Biden’s budget proposal. 

 

Health care savings 

The budget proposes increasing the pace of Medicare drug negotiation and bringing more drugs into negotiation sooner after they launch. Last year, the administration named the first 10 prescription drugs that will be subject to negotiations — medications to treat heart failure, blood clots, diabetes, kidney disease, arthritis, blood cancers and more — under the Inflation Reduction Act. 

 

Biden’s budget would also expand the IRA’s rebates and $2,000 out-of-pocket prescription drug cost cap beyond Medicare and into the commercial market. 

It would also extend the $35 cost-sharing cap for a month’s supply of insulin to the commercial market. 

 

Child Care Savings

Biden’s plan would restore the expanded Child Tax Credit by an average of $2,600 for 39 million low- and middle-income families. 

 

It would also establish an affordable child care program for families earning less than $200,000 and a national paid leave program of up to 12 weeks for eligible workers. 

Plus, it would allocate $8.5 billion to states for Child Care and Development Block Grants — the primary federal funding source for child care subsidies. 

 

Home ownership tax credits 

The budget includes a new tax credit for middle-class first-time homebuyers of up to $10,000 over two years. 

Biden also calls on Congress to provide a one-year tax credit of up to $10,000 to middle-class families who sell their starter home to unlock further inventory in the housing market. 

The budget would also provide for first-time homebuyers a $5,000 annual mortgage relief credit for two years. 

 

Foreign policy funding 

Overall, the president’s budget includes $850 billion in discretionary budget authority for 2025 for the Department of Defense — a 4.1% increase from the previous year. 

It also includes a request for unmet needs from the administration’s October 2023 supplemental request for urgent security needs through the end of 2024. 

 

Tax changes 

The majority of Biden’s budget would be paid for by adjustments to taxes, such as reversing the 2017 Trump corporate tax cut. Under Biden’s plan, the corporate tax rate would go from 21% back up to 28% — though it would still be lower than the 35% rate prior to the Trump-era cut. 

The proposal also includes a 25% minimum tax on people with wealth of more than $100 million and would deny corporate deductions for all compensation over $1 million for employees, targeting the high wages of some CEOs. 

Plus, a 39.6% marginal rate would be applied to households making over $1 million. 

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

HUD Secretary Marcia Fudge to step down

HUD Secretary Marcia Fudge to step down
HUD Secretary Marcia Fudge to step down
Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Marcia Fudge announced Monday that she is stepping down from her cabinet position later this month — marking only the second cabinet secretary to do so during the Biden administration. 

“From her time as a mayor, to her years as a fierce advocate in the U.S. House of Representatives, Marcia’s vision, passion, and focus on increasing economic opportunity have been assets to our country. I’m grateful for all of her contributions toward a housing system that works for all Americans, and I wish her well in her next chapter,” President Joe Biden wrote in a statement on her departure. 

Fudge sat for an exclusive interview with USA Today and said she is leaving public office for retirement. Her last day is March 22. 

“Don’t look for me to ever be on another ballot or another appointee or anything like that,’‘ she told USA Today. “I really do look forward to being a private citizen.” 

Fudge, who has served in the role for three years, was only the second black woman to lead the agency. 

When Fudge departs, Deputy Secretary Adrianne Todman will serve as acting secretary. 

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

‘House of cards’: Special counsel slams Hunter Biden’s effort to dismiss tax charges

‘House of cards’: Special counsel slams Hunter Biden’s effort to dismiss tax charges
‘House of cards’: Special counsel slams Hunter Biden’s effort to dismiss tax charges
Mark Makela/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — Special counsel David Weiss has filed his rebuttal to efforts by President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden to have his nine tax-related charges in California dismissed, slamming his arguments in court filings as a “conspiracy theory,” a “house of cards,” and “shapeshifting claims.” 

In response to Hunter Biden’s claim of selective prosecution, Weiss’ office used his own words against him, drawing from comments Hunter Biden made during his congressional testimony last month. 

Noting that Hunter Biden, in his motion to dismiss the tax case last month, accused Weiss’ office of bowing to political pressure from Congressional Republicans, Weiss, in his response issued Friday, pointed out that Hunter Biden “testified to Congress that the Special Counsel had undermined the impeachment inquiry conducted by House Republicans.” 

“Which is it?” Weiss wrote. “Indeed, the defendant has no evidence to support his shapeshifting claims because the Special Counsel continues to pursue the fair, evenhanded administration of the federal criminal laws.” 

Hunter Biden in February filed a flurry of motions to have the nine-count tax indictment Weiss’ office filed late last year dismissed, accusing prosecutors of selectively targeting him and filing duplicative charges on three counts of failure to pay and tax evasion, and claiming that the statute of limitations had expired on one of the charges. 

Hunter Biden also argued that the immunity stipulation in a section of the parties’ ill-fated plea deal from last summer remains in effect. His legal team wrote that that the tax charges “violate” the terms of the diversion agreement, and accused prosecutors of attempting to “backtrack and renege” on the deal. 

Weiss’ office, in his response Friday, claimed that it was Hunter Biden — not prosecutors — who walked away from negotiations. Weiss’ office “proposed changes to the agreements” after the July 26 hearing where the deal fell apart, he wrote. 

“The defendant rejected these counterproposals and refused further negotiations,” Weiss wrote. 

Weiss made additional rebuttals to many of the other motions to dismiss, which included claims of improper venue and statute of limitations. 

Weiss’ office charged Hunter Biden in December with nine felony and misdemeanor charges stemming from his failure to pay $1.4 million in taxes for three years during a time when he was in the throes of addiction. Hunter Biden has pleaded not guilty to all charges. 

The back taxes and penalties were previously paid in full by a third party, identified by ABC News as Hunter Biden’s attorney and confidant, Kevin Morris. 

The federal judge overseeing this case will hold a hearing on these arguments later this month. 

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

E. Jean Carroll’s attorneys ask judge to approve Trump’s $91M bond in her defamation case

E. Jean Carroll’s attorneys ask judge to approve Trump’s M bond in her defamation case
E. Jean Carroll’s attorneys ask judge to approve Trump’s $91M bond in her defamation case
Melissa Sue Gerrits/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — Lawyers for former Elle magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll have requested that the judge in her defamation case against Donald Trump approve the $91,630,000 bond secured by the former president, subject to a small change in one of the terms. 

The change reduces the amount of time between the resolution of Trump’s appeal and Carroll’s payment. 

“Depending on the Court’s preference, Your Honor can so order this letter, or the parties can submit a stipulation or other appropriate documentation to effectuate this change,” Carroll’s attorneys wrote in a letter sent Monday to Judge Lewis Kaplan. 

The agreement on the bond is expected to negate the need for a proposed hearing on the matter Monday afternoon. 

Trump in January was ordered to pay $83.3 million plus interest in damages to Carroll for defaming her in 2019 when he denied her allegation that he sexually abused her in the dressing room of a Manhattan department store in the 1990s. 

Trump on Friday secured a $91,630,000 bond to cover the judgment and filed a notice of appeal of the judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. 

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Sen. Bob Menendez pleads not guilty to obstruction charges in new federal indictment

Sen. Bob Menendez pleads not guilty to obstruction charges in new federal indictment
Sen. Bob Menendez pleads not guilty to obstruction charges in new federal indictment
Kent Nishimura/Getty Images

(NEW YORK) — New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez pleaded not guilty Monday to obstruction charges contained in a new federal indictment filed in Manhattan that added to the bribery and corruption charges he already faced. 

“Once again not guilty your honor,” Menendez said. 

Menendez came to court alongside his wife, Nadine, who also pleaded not guilty to the new charges. 

Federal prosecutors said the couple allegedly tried to make bribes — that took the form of a new Mercedes-Benz and a mortgage payment — look like loans. The pair allegedly instructed their attorneys at the time to tell federal investigators they thought a mortgage payment on Nadine Menendez’s house and a payment for her Mercedes-Benz were loans when, in fact, prosecutors said they knew the payments were bribes. 

When Menendez and his wife learned of the federal investigation in 2022, prosecutors said they sought to cover up the bribe payments. 

Menendez, his wife and two New Jersey businessmen — all of whom pleaded not guilty to the new obstruction counts — are scheduled to stand trial in May. 

On Monday, Judge Sidney Stein declined Bob Menendez’s request to adjourn the trial date in light of the new charges. 

“From my standpoint, the May 6 date stands,” the judge said. 

A third businessman who had been charged in the case, Jose Uribe, pleaded guilty earlier this month and agreed to cooperate. Uribe supplied Nadine Menendez with the luxury convertible in exchange for the senator’s help, prosecutors said. 

The new indictment, which brings the total number of charges Bob Menendez faces to 18, followed Uribe’s plea. 

Prosecutors have alleged the senator took gifts — gold bars, wads of cash and luxury watches, among others — in exchange for doing official favors for Uribe and the governments of Egypt and Qatar. He is the first sitting member of Congress to be charged with conspiracy by a public official to act as a foreign agent. 

Bob Menendez has denied all wrongdoing and called the prosecution “overzealous.” 

When asked Monday by ABC News whether he would run for reelection, the senator — who has held his seat since 2006 — said he “wouldn’t be announcing it in a courtroom.” 

Federal prosecutors said it would take four to six weeks for them to put on a case. Defense attorneys expect to take at least a week. 

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Progressive groups launch ‘Reject AIPAC’ effort as Democratic divides over Israel deepen

Progressive groups launch ‘Reject AIPAC’ effort as Democratic divides over Israel deepen
Progressive groups launch ‘Reject AIPAC’ effort as Democratic divides over Israel deepen
Tim Graham/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — A coalition of nearly two-dozen progressive groups on Monday launched a seven-figure effort to defend progressive Democrats in Congress who have criticized both Israel’s military offensive in Gaza and continued U.S. support for Israel — marking a major new development in the intraparty battle over support for Israel in the Democratic Party.

The “Reject AIPAC” bloc, which includes Justice Democrats, Our Revolution, the Sunrise Movement and the IfNotNow Movement, plans to rally voters as part of a “electoral defense campaign” to support Democrats who have been criticized by the pro-Israel American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

The coalition will also organize demonstrations calling for a cease-fire in Gaza and for lawmakers to impose new conditions on U.S. military support for Israel as Israel targets Hamas fighters — while encouraging lawmakers to sign a pledge to not take campaign contributions from AIPAC.

The latter group has deep ties in Washington, across both sides of the aisle, and regularly endorses both pro-Israel Republicans and Democrats every election cycle.

United Democracy Project, the organization’s super PAC, has received millions of dollars from Democratic megadonors, such as Haim Saban, as well as Republicans donors including hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer and Home Depot founder Bernie Marcus, according to Open Secrets.

In a statement to ABC News, the anti-AIPAC coalition accused AIPAC of working to “silence growing dissent in Congress” over Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza, “even as Democratic voters overwhelmingly support a ceasefire and oppose sending more blank checks to the Israeli military.”

Already, AIPAC has endorsed Missouri Democratic candidate Wesley Bell and New York Democratic candidate George Latimer, who have launched primary campaigns against progressive “Squad” member Reps. Cori Bush, of Missouri, and New York’s Jamaal Bowman, who have been vocal in pushing back on Israel’s campaign in Gaza.

The group spent tens of millions of dollars in Democratic primaries in the 2022 midterm elections and supported the successful campaign of Rep. Haley Stevens, D-Mich., when she faced fellow Democratic Rep. Andy Levin, a progressive who had voiced criticism of Israel.

AIPAC, and Democratic Majority for Israel, another pro-Israel super PAC, have been among the most prolific outside spending groups in recent election cycles.

United Democracy Project (UPD) has already raised $45 million so far this election cycle, more than $26 million of that pouring in after October, disclosure filings show. That’s a big jump from what the group raised during the last election cycle, when they brought in just under $35 million throughout the two-year period.

The Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI)’s super PAC reported raising a relatively smaller $3.5 million so far this cycle.

Both groups have devoted much of their resources to a House race in California’s 47th District, with UPD spending more than $4.6 million unsuccessfully opposing Democratic California state Sen. Dave Min, who will be facing Republican counterpart Scott Baugh, and DMFI’s political action committee similarly spending hundreds of thousands of dollars opposing Min and supporting his Democratic primary rival.

AIPAC has been clear that it makes political decisions on one criteria: “commitment to strengthening the US-Israel relationship,” a spokesperson told Politico earlier this month.

“We support scores of progressive candidates including the Democratic leadership and nearly half of the membership of the congressional Progressive Caucus, Black Caucus and Hispanic Caucus,” the spokesperson said then.

According to a February poll from Quinnipiac University, 48% of registered voters slightly oppose sending more military aid to Israel, while 44% approve.

Roughly 53% of Democrats oppose sending more aid to Israel, while 38 approve of it. Among independents, 55% oppose more aid and 38 approve; roughly 63% of Republican responded supported more aid, and 32 percent opposed it, according to the poll.

More than 30,000 people have been killed in Gaza the last five months of the conflict between Israel and Hamas, which was sparked by Hamas’ Oct. 7 terror attack, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry.

Hundreds of thousands of Gazans in the territory are on the brink of famine, the U.N. has said.

Israeli officials insist the military takes steps to curb civilian casualties, despite the death toll, and they deny accusations that Israel isn’t letting enough aid into Gaza, blaming U.N. and its partner agencies for creating logistical challenges — which the organization disputes.

ABC News’ Soo Rin Kim contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Buttigieg calls out Katie Britt’s misleading use of sex trafficking victim’s story to attack Biden

Buttigieg calls out Katie Britt’s misleading use of sex trafficking victim’s story to attack Biden
Buttigieg calls out Katie Britt’s misleading use of sex trafficking victim’s story to attack Biden
ABC News

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg on Sunday called out Alabama Sen. Katie Britt’s misleading use of an anecdote on sex trafficking to attack President Joe Biden’s record on border security in her response to his State of the Union address.

“I’ll leave it to her to explain the falsehoods, but I think it illustrates the bigger issue,” Buttigieg told ABC News “This Week” anchor George Stephanopoulos. “She’s a United States senator and the United States Senate right now could be acting to help secure the southern border.”

He highlighted a recent bipartisan agreement on immigration changes that didn’t pass the chamber as Donald Trump criticized it.

Buttigieg said the proposal included “tough compromises for all sides, something that the bases of both parties might not have loved but that would have made a real positive difference — only for that to be killed by the chill effect that the former president put on congressional Republicans, telling them not to support anything that would represent a policy win for President Biden.” (Trump said the proposal was insufficient to fix the problem.)

Thursday night, in delivering the official Republican response to Biden’s State of the Union speech, Britt told the story of meeting a woman at the border who recounted her experience of being raped by cartels beginning when she was 12 years old.

According to several reports, including from The New York Times and Associated Press, the apparent victim Britt was referencing has chronicled her abuse in the past, saying it happened in Mexico between 2004 and 2008 — during George W. Bush’s presidency.

The woman, a Mexican citizen named Karla Jacinto Romero, told the Times she learned about Britt’s remarks via social media and found it “very strange.”

“I am involved in the fight to stop trafficking and I don’t think it should be political,” she told the paper.

In her State of the Union rebuttal, Britt made it appear as though Biden’s actions were related to the that victim’s experience.

“We wouldn’t be OK with this happening in a third-world country,” she said. “This is the United States of America, and it is past time, in my opinion, that we start acting like it. President Biden’s border policies are a disgrace. This crisis is despicable.”

She defended her word choice in a separate appearance on Fox News on Sunday, insisting that Biden’s actions had made human trafficking incidents more likely.

Buttigieg shot back on “This Week,” telling Stephanopoulos, “We have a very clear choice between congressional Republicans who seem to prefer that this issue remain bad so that they can attack the president over it and those who would actually like to solve it or at least improve it and address it.”

The secretary also pointed to failed efforts since the Bush administration to pass bipartisan immigration reform, including the Senate deal this year.

“Will 2024 go down in history as yet another failed attempt with bipartisan compromise, or will congressional Republicans follow the lead of their own negotiators and the president of the United States and actually do something about it?” Buttigieg said.

But Americans are split between Biden and Trump, who is set to be the Republican nominee for president, on who would do a better job leading the country, polling shows.

A new ABC News/Ipsos survey finds that 36% of U.S. adults trust Trump to do a better job, while 33% say Biden would and 30% say they trust neither to lead the U.S.

Republicans trust Trump (82%) more than Democrats trust Biden (72%).

The poll also finds Biden trailing Trump on key issues, including the economy, inflation, crime and the border.

“How do you explain that? How do you turn it around?” Stephanopoulos asked Buttigieg on “This Week.”

The secretary said he believes Biden deserves more credit for his work on the economy — citing high job creation and low unemployment — but that “credit doesn’t improve unless you go out and take credit and explain how these things were achieved.”

“That’s one of the reasons why I’m so energized by the president’s State of the Union address, where he talked about the achievements that had come about on his watch and why — and then just as importantly talked about the future,” Buttigieg said.

“Of course it requires work to get that story out, especially when there’s a firehose of negativity talking down the economy and trying to change the subject from the president’s achievements,” Buttigieg later added, calling that “just politics.”

He went on to say, “The nature of our world and certainly the nature of today’s media environment is people aren’t just going to go hand the credit to the president. We need to be out there.”

Britt, in her response to the State of the Union, also criticized Biden on his broader record as president, saying he is “dithering and diminished” and asking the American public if they feel they are better off today compared to three years ago, when Trump was in office.

Stephanopoulos said many in the public seem to agree that they aren’t better off now, but Buttigieg maintained that Biden helped the country emerge from the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021.

What’s more, he said, Biden’s State of the Union showed him “in command, showing strength and clarity of vision.”

Stephanopoulos pressed Buttigieg on how an 81-year-old incumbent president could be the candidate of change, a dynamic that is often “so critical in presidential elections.”

Polling has long shown broad concerns about Biden’s age and fitness for another term, which the president dismisses.

“Look at the changes that he’s brought about. Take some of the issues that matter most to newer generations. Climate is a great example, right?” Buttigieg responded, before also listing LGBTQ+ rights and reproductive freedom as other areas of focus for the Biden White House.

“It’s a good example of that saying that what matters most is the age of a leader’s ideas,” Buttigieg said.

Copyright © 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.