(ATLANTA) — Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Judge Scott McAfee will face voters on Tuesday during the state’s primary election — both of whom have been key players in the election interference case against former President Donald Trump and his allies.
Willis will face off against Atlanta attorney Christian Wise Smith in the Democratic primary; McAfee will go up against attorney Robert Patillo in a nonpartisan election.
If either Willis or McAfee loses their primary and is booted from the job, the election interference case could be further delayed. The case has already faced delays over efforts to remove Willis from the prosecution.
If Willis wins Tuesday, she’ll face Republican lawyer Courtney Kramer in the general election. Kramer previously worked in the Trump White House and on his campaign.
During an appearance on the “Rachel Maddow Show,” Willis said she plans to “win big” in her primary, framing her election around a rebuke against the threats she has faced since taking office.
“Having prosecutors that are free from interference and are allowed to just look at cases, look at the facts, and if people … broke the law to bring charges, has to go on for us to live in a free society,” said Willis.
Willis’ election comes as Nathan Wade, the lead prosecutor in the Fulton County case, resigned after Judge McAfee ruled that either she or Wade must step aside from the case due to a “significant appearance of impropriety” stemming from a romantic relationship between the two. The Georgia Court of Appeals has since agreed to review the disqualification ruling, delaying the trial further.
McAfee, who is overseeing the racketeering case against Donald Trump and 14 others, is also on the ballot in a nonpartisan election.
McAfee’s election bid comes after he was appointed by Gov. Brian Kemp in 2022. He’s now running for his first full term. He is up against Patillo.
McAfee’s campaign website bills him as someone who has “devoted his career to public service” as a prosecutor, and someone who “has pledged to be fully transparent with all public matters that come before him.”
Georgia’s election on Tuesday does not include a presidential primary — that happened in March, and President Joe Biden and Trump won their respective primaries in the state.
(WASHINGTON) — Former President Donald Trump on Monday deleted a social media video that referenced the phrase “Unified Reich” after his critics said the phrase mirrors that of Nazi Germany.
The phrase “Unified Reich” appears as a part of hypothetical news articles in the video that announce Trump’s hypothetical victory in the 2024 election, with the narrator asking, “What happens after Donald Trump wins?”
Under a big headline that says, “WHAT’S NEXT FOR AMERICA?” there is a smaller headline that appears to read: “INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED DRIVEN BY THE CREATION OF A UNIFIED REICH.”
The video then predicts an economic boom, tax cuts, border security and deportation of undocumented immigrants if Trump wins the 2024 election.
A spokesperson for the Biden-Harris 2024 campaign on Monday night slammed the video saying it was “parroting Mein Kampf.”
“Donald Trump is not playing games; he is telling America exactly what he intends to do if he regains power: rule as a dictator over a ‘unified Reich,’ Biden campaign spokesperson James Singer wrote in a statement.
“Parroting Mein Kampf while you warn of a bloodbath if you lose is the type of unhinged behavior you get from a guy who knows that democracy continues to reject his extreme vision of chaos, division, and violence,” Singer continued.
In a statement to ABC News, the Trump campaign claimed it is not a campaign video but rather a random online video reposted by a staffer who did not see the word.
“This was not a campaign video, it was created by a random account online and reposted by a staffer who clearly did not see the word, while the President was in court,” Karoline Leavitt, the campaign press secretary, said in a statement.
The video was posted at 1:58 p.m. ET when the trial in Trump’s hush money trial was at lunch. The video was taken down Tuesday morning, after existing on Trump’s social media page for more than 18 hours.
The video appears to have been made using an existing video template that mimics an old newspaper, several parts of the template referencing historic dates and events.
In the template, one mock news article appears to say, “INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED IN 1871, DRIVEN BY THE CREATION OF A UNIFIED REICH,” the reference to the year 1871 not visible in the video Trump shared because it was blurred and cut.
Over the past year, Trump has repeatedly faced similar criticisms of echoing words of Nazi Germany or fascist figures, including during a rally in November last year when he compared his political opponents to “vermin” that he will “root out.”
Trump has also repeatedly said undocumented immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country” — drawing scrutiny from critics who say that language is used by white supremacists and Hitler, who infamously wrote about “blood poisoning” in his book Mein Kampf.
Trump later claimed he’s never read Mein Kampf, saying he’s using such language “in a much different way” when he disparages undocumented immigrants.
Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung last year too rejected the comparisons to Hitler and Mussolini,” calling it a “ridiculous assertion.”
“Those who try to make that ridiculous assertion are clearly snowflakes grasping for anything because they are suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and their sad, miserable existence will be crushed when President Trump returns to the White House,” Cheung said.
(WASHINGTON) — Former President Donald Trump on Monday posted a video on his social media platform that uses a language that appears to mirror that of Nazi Germany, suggesting there will be a “Unified Reich” if he wins the 2024 election.
The phrase “Unified Reich” appears as a part of hypothetical news headlines that announce Trump’s hypothetical victory in the 2024 election, with the narrator asking, “What happens after Donald Trump wins?”
Under a big headline that says, “WHAT’S NEXT FOR AMERICA?” there is a smaller headline underneath that appears to read: “INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED DRIVEN BY THE CREATION OF A UNIFIED REICH.”
The video then predicts an economic boom, tax cuts, border security and deportation of undocumented immigrants if Trump wins the 2024 election.
The video was posted at 1:58 p.m. ET when the trial in Trump’s hush money trial was at lunch. The video was still up late Monday night.
ABC News has reached out to the Trump campaign for comment.
A spokesperson for the Biden-Harris 2024 campaign slammed the video saying it was “parroting Mein Kampf.”
“America, stop scrolling and pay attention. Donald Trump is not playing games; he is telling America exactly what he intends to do if he regains power: rule as a dictator over a ‘unified Reich.’ Parroting Mein Kampf while you warn of a bloodbath if you lose is the type of unhinged behavior you get from a guy who knows that democracy continues to reject his extreme vision of chaos, division, and violence,” the statement from spokesperson James Singer read.
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin holds a joint press conference following a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group at the Pentagon, May 20, 2024, in Arlington, Va. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
(WASHINGTON) — The United States’ top military leaders said Monday that Russian President Vladimir Putin has opened “another front” in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine, home to the country’s second-largest city.
“Putin’s forces have opened another front to seize sovereign Ukrainian territory, and the Kremlin’s invaders are obliterating Ukrainian villages, killing innocent civilians and bombarding civilian infrastructure including dams and power plants,” Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters after a meeting of the Ukrainian Defense Contact Group, an international working group coordinating defensive assistance for Kyiv.
Despite the Russian advance, the defense secretary said U.S. weapons shouldn’t be used beyond Ukrainian territory.
“Our expectation is that they continue to use the weapons that we provided on targets inside of Ukraine,” Austin said.
U.S. military assistance, another $60 billion of which was passed by Congress and signed by President Joe Biden in April, is arriving as Ukraine faces a Russian offensive that could determine the “character” of the war, Can Kasapoğlu, a senior fellow and political-military affairs expert at the Hudson Institute, told ABC News.
Gen. C.Q. Brown, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Monday that Russia’s new offensive “aim[s] to establish a shallow buffer zone along the Ukrainian border.”
“Russia anticipates that this will divert Ukrainian focus and capabilities from other critical areas,” he said.
Kharkiv was recaptured by Ukraine in a fall 2022 counteroffensive after Russia took the city in its initial invasion in February 2022.
Russia has not breached the Ukrainian front line, but Kasapoğlu said the front line is not stabilized, leaving doubt as to whether Ukraine can hold the city if Russia mounts an effort to take it.
“The Russians managed to secure many tactical gains” in the Kharkiv region and around the city of Kharkiv, Kasapoğlu said, and the Russians can be expected to “try to enhance these tactical footholds … and gradually move forward to get Kharkiv city in artillery range.”
“This may go beyond merely a subordinate effort or a distractive effort,” Kasapoğlu continued.
If the offensive is a main effort, and the Russians can recapture Kharkiv after winning it once and then losing it, “the chances are really slim for Ukraine to launch a large-scale counteroffensive and retake territory from the Russians,” Kasapoğlu said.
It could become clear “in the forthcoming weeks” whether Russia can “translate [its] tactical gains into strategic gains” and retake Kharkiv, Kasapoğlu said.
After completing its spring conscription, Russia has sufficient manpower, and the scope of the Kharkiv offensive is largely a function of whether Putin chooses to double down, Kasapoğlu said.
The United States’ supplemental package included much-needed artillery, as well as munitions for air defense, but Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said his forces need more.
The crisis in Kharkiv is “the world’s fault,” Zelenskyy told ABC News’ James Longman Friday, adding: “We cannot afford to lose Kharkiv.”
Air defenses, which Austin said the contact group discussed at length Monday, are crucial, Zelenskyy told Longman.
“All we need are two Patriot systems,” he said.
The U.S. package includes munitions for the Patriots but not the systems themselves. The Germans have committed to providing one — a move praised by Austin on Monday — but the Pentagon chief said in April the system wouldn’t be a “silver bullet” for Ukraine’s defense.
Long-range ATACMS, a missile system the U.S. acknowledged it dispatched to Ukraine for the first time in April, could have made a difference in Ukraine’s early defense of Kharkiv, according to Kasapoğlu.
This would have been the “ideal weapon” to counter a heavy buildup of Russian troops, Kasapoğlu said, but because the Russians were striking for the first time from their own territory — and not from within Ukraine — Ukraine was restricted from using them by allies’ conditions.
Victoria Nuland, former undersecretary of state for political affairs, told ABC News’ Martha Raddatz on This Week Sunday that American weapons should be available to Ukraine for Russian targets.
“I think if the attacks are coming directly from over the line in Russia, that those bases ought to be fair game, whether they are where missiles are being launched from or where the troops are being supplied from,” she said.
(WASHINGTON) — In October 1992, businessman and independent presidential candidate Ross Perot stood at a podium to the left of Bill Clinton and George H. W. Bush at the third presidential debate of the general election cycle.
An independent candidate for president has not made it on the debate stage since.
Three decades after Perot participated in all three general election debates en route to winning nearly 20 million votes, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hopes to join President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump in next month’s CNN debate.
Kennedy, though, faces a difficult task in meeting CNN’s thresholds, which the network announced last week after it said it had reached agreements with Biden and Trump on the terms of the debate, to be held in Atlanta.
To qualify, Kennedy must net at least 15% in four separate national polls that meet CNN’s standards for reporting and appear on enough ballots to reach 270 electoral votes.
Kennedy polls around 10 percent, according to 538’s national polling average, and he is confirmed on the ballot in only enough states to reach 35 electoral votes, according to state officials.
The independent candidate has insisted he will meet the criteria, and in a post on X last week, he accused Trump and Biden of “colluding” to keep him off the debate stage after Biden and Trump agreed one of the conditions of the debate is that it’s just between the two of them — barring Kennedy from participating.
Kennedy said Sunday that his team was “in discussions” with CNN, though he did not elaborate on what those talks entailed. A CNN spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.
The independent candidate said last week that he would meet the criteria, though he did not specify how, while also accusing Trump and Biden of “colluding” to keep him off the debate stage.
It was less difficult in 1992 for independent candidates to qualify for presidential debates, according to Ballotpedia, which noted that the Commission on Presidential Debates did not automatically exclude a candidate based on poll numbers then (in 2000, the commission cemented a 15% polling minimum as part of its criteria).
Perot qualified for the 1992 debates using criteria set by the Commission on Presidential Debates, which has organized the debates since 1988. But those criteria did not include a 15% polling threshold like the one Kennedy faces today. The commission implemented such a threshold in 2000, which CNN has adopted for its June debate,
Moreover, Perot had achieved ballot access in all 50 states, which he accomplished in part by having an “enormous amount of money,” according to Bernard Tamas, a professor at Valdosta State University and author of the book, “The Demise and Rebirth of American Third Parties.”
Perot also had the support of a large swath of the American electorate — enough so that he led Clinton and Bush in polls earlier that year, a marker Kennedy has not approached this cycle.
Perot was “well received” in the 1992 debates, Tamas told ABC News. But he may have turned off a portion of the electorate who saw him as “not highly scripted or well prepared” on key issues, according to Barry Burden, a professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin.
Despite eventually winning millions of votes across the country, Perot did not win a single state.
Increasing partisanship and party loyalty may have contribute to the fact that no independent candidates since Perot have made a major debate stage, Burden told ABC News.
“[In] ’92, when Perot did so well, was probably the last presidential election before the real ramp-up in partisan animosity got escalated over time, and so I think there were more voters who were open to considering a candidate who wasn’t of their party, and a lot of voters who weren’t attached to a party psychologically,” he said.
Kennedy enjoys strong support relative to recent independent presidential candidates, but Tamas noted while Kennedy is likely to get ballot access in each state, the 15% polling threshold is still a high bar that the candidate will have to work hard to reach.
“In terms of getting his support up to 15%, while possible, that’s going to be the much more difficult hurdle for him [in making a debate stage],” Tamas said.
Photo Illustration by Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
(WASHINGTON) — The threat posed by artificial intelligence programs is real and creates a serious challenge going into the 2024 election, according to a new federal assessment.
The analysis, compiled by the Department of Homeland Security and obtained by ABC News, outlines how, with less than six months before Election Day, next-generation technologies meant to fuel advancement also offer opportunities for misuse that could threaten the democratic system’s bedrock of elections.
“As the 2024 election cycle progresses, generative AI tools likely provide both domestic and foreign threat actors with enhanced opportunities for interference by aggravating emergent events, disrupting election processes, or attacking election infrastructure,” the May 17 document said. Those tools, the bulletin said, can be wielded to “influence and sow discord” in upcoming U.S. elections by those who view them as “attractive” and “priority” targets.
“This is not a problem for the future. This is a problem of today,” said John Cohen, the former intelligence chief at the Department of Homeland Security, and now an ABC News contributor. “Foreign and domestic threat actors have fully embraced the internet, and they are increasingly using advanced computing capabilities like artificial intelligence to conduct their illegal operations.”
Already, those attempting to target elections have done so “by conducting cyber-enabled hack-and-leak campaigns, voice spoofing, online disinformation campaigns, and threatening or plotting attacks against symbols of the US elections,” the bulletin said.
And now, the analysis warns, the innovative abilities of generative AI can be used against future elections.Those tools can be exploited “to confuse or overwhelm voters and election staff to disrupt their duties” by creating or sharing “altered” or deepfaked pictures, videos or audio clips “regarding the details of Election Day, such as claiming that a polling station is closed or that polling times have changed, or to generate or promote other tailored false information online.”
On the eve of the New Hampshire primary in January, a robocall seeming to impersonate the voice of President Joe Biden circulated, encouraging recipients of the call to “save your vote” for the November general election, rather than participate in the state’s primary, according to audio obtained at the time by ABC News.
That “generative AI-created audio message” was specifically flagged in the DHS analysis, which also noted “the timing of election-specific AI-generated media can be just as critical as the content itself, as it may take time to counter-message or debunk the false content permeating online.”
“This may be one of the most difficult elections for Americans to navigate finding ground truth in our lifetimes,” said Elizabeth Neumann, a DHS assistant secretary during the first years of Donald Trump’s presidency, and now an ABC News contributor. “It’s not just whether a politician is telling you the truth, but you won’t even be able to trust your own eyes at the images you’re seeing in your social media feeds, in your email and possibly even traditional media, if they don’t do a good enough job vetting the material.”
The 2024 race has been marked by increasingly toxic rhetoric, and the intermingling of inflammatory campaign trail hyperbole and courtroom theatrics, as Trump faces four criminal cases in which he maintains his innocence. Hate speech, misinformation and disinformation are running rampant on social media and in real life — even as rapidly evolving technology remains vulnerable, experts said. Meanwhile, wars in the Middle East and Ukraine continue overseas, dividing Americans’ views on foreign policy, with the conflicts rippling out in protests at major U.S. college campuses from coast to coast.
“Threat actors can attempt to exploit deepfake videos, audio content, or other generative AI media to amplify discontent,” the DHS analysis said. “A well-timed deepfake or piece of AI-generated media for a targeted audience could spur individuals to take action that may result in violence or physical disruptions directed toward the elections or candidates.”
The threat landscape has grown “more diverse and more complex,” and protecting the integrity of U.S. elections faces more challenges than ever due to the accelerating sophistication of artificial intelligence, top intelligence officials told lawmakers last Wednesday.
“Using every tool we have is critical as the challenge is expanding,” Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a Senate committee holding a hearing focused on threats to the 2024 elections. “There are an increasing number of foreign actors, including non-state entities who are looking to engage in election influence activities,” she said, adding “relevant emerging technologies, particularly generative AI and big data analytics, are increasing the threat by enabling the proliferation of influence actors who can conduct targeted campaigns.”
“Innovations in AI have enabled foreign influence actors to produce seemingly authentic and tailored messaging more efficiently, at greater scale,” Haines added. “Even as the threat landscape is becoming increasingly complicated, it is my view that the U.S. government has never been better prepared to address the challenge,” in part thanks to lessons learned from the 2016 presidential election.
Authorities at every level need to be ready to defend against artificial intelligence disseminating fake news at this delicate moment, experts said.
“One of the most important things we need to be doing now is educating and preparing the public. Because they will be the people who are being targeted with this content — the public is the intended target — and the objective is to influence how people behave,” Cohen said.
“State and local officials need to have a plan, so that when this content is detected, they can use trusted sources of communication to counteract and correct inaccurate information. Once that content hits, it’s going to spread across the online media ecosystem rapidly, and has to be counteracted immediately,” Cohen added. “Law enforcement and our security community have been slow to adapt to this rapidly evolving threat environment. We’re still using the strategies of yesterday to deal with a threat of today. In a way, it’s bringing a knife to a gunfight.”
(ATLANTA) — President Joe Biden was met with silent protests as he delivered the commencement address at Morehouse College in Atlanta on Sunday, after some students and faculty members voiced strong opposition to his visit over the president’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.
In his speech before the president’s address, valedictorian DeAngelo “DJ” Fletcher called for an “immediate and permanent cease-fire in Gaza.”
When Biden spoke, he directly addressed the issue, saying, “What’s happening in Gaza and Israel is heartbreaking.”
“We can’t stop wars that break out and break our hearts,” Biden said. “I want to say this very clearly: I support peaceful, nonviolent protests. Your voices should be heard, and I promise you I hear them.”
Later, he revealed that even his own family is frustrated by failed attempts to create lasting peace in the region.
“What after? What after Hamas? What happens then? What happens in Gaza? What rights do the Palestinian people have? I am working to make sure we finally get a two-state solution. The only solution: for two people to live in peace, security and dignity,” Biden said. “It is one of the hardest, most complicated problems in the world. There’s nothing easy about it. I know it angers and frustrates many of you, including my family.”
As the graduates filed in for the ceremony Sunday, some were noticeably wearing Palestinian flags and keffiyehs, a headdress typically worn by men in the Middle East, draped around their shoulders.
While there were no disruptive protests, students and faculty showed their opposition in other ways. A handful of graduates turned their chairs when Biden spoke. One faculty member stood with her back turned away from the president with her right fist raised.
Notably, there was an age divide in support among Morehouse graduates: The alumni sitting to the left gave standing ovations during and after Biden’s speech, while the 2024 graduating class mainly remained seated throughout.
While Biden spoke, faculty held up the Democratic Republic of Congo’s flag prominently behind him. The country is involved in its own humanitarian crisis stemming from unprecedented violence in the country.
Morehouse’s valedictorian delivered remarks before Biden, saying that in honor of the school’s legacy, he felt it was right to call for a cease-fire.
“It is only right for the class of 2024 to utilize any platform provided to stand in solidarity with peace and justice,” Fletcher said. “The Israel-Gaza conflict has plagued the people of its region for generations.”
“It is my stance as a Morehouse man — nay, as a human being — to call for an immediate and permanent cease-fire in the Gaza strip,” Fletcher said. “Hear the people of this world sing the song of righteous justice.”
Biden looked pensive and stoic as he was seated behind Fletcher and clapped after the valedictorian called for an immediate and permanent cease-fire.
Biden later noted he’s also called for a cease-fire in Gaza.
“It’s a humanitarian crisis in Gaza. That’s why I’ve called for an immediate cease-fire. An immediate cease-fire, stop the fighting. Bring the hostages back,” Biden said. “I’ve been working on a deal as we speak. Working around the clock to … get more aid into Gaza, rebuild Gaza.”
The Rev. Hardy Spurgeon Bennings III, who offered a prayer at the start of the ceremony, also addressed the war in Gaza and conflicts in other regions, saying the young men graduating should hold those in power accountable and call for protecting human life everywhere.
“God, make this class those men with a moral conscience that will cause this country to be mindful of its moral duty,” he said, later adding: “Make these men men who will hold our communities and our country accountable for valuing human life.”
“Whether it is a baby in a mother’s womb, or whether it is a baby who a mother expects to come home in the afternoon, whether it’s a child in an underprivileged school or a charter school, whether they live in Israel or Palestine, Ukraine or Russia, the Congo or Haiti, God, give us men who will value life and call us to accountability,” the reverend said.
Biden’s speech came during an election year in a key swing state in front of a key voting bloc — Morehouse is one of the country’s most famous historically Black colleges — and after much speculation over how he would be received.
Polling shows Biden faces headwinds to win over some young and Black voters who voted for him in 2020, and protests erupted in recent months on college campuses across the United States over the president’s handling of the war in Gaza. Morehouse ultimately decided not to rescind Biden’s invitation to speak at its commencement, and a vote was held to confirm he would be granted an honorary doctorate.
(WASHINGTON) — Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said Sunday that he’s unconcerned about how President Joe Biden will fare at his first debate with former President Donald Trump next month.
The two candidates’ agreement bucked the Commission on Presidential Debates, the longtime organizer of such forums. Biden’s camp suggested the body was unable to handle Trump as a candidate on stage, and the former president has long decried the group as biased against him, leveling similar accusations as the ones he does against mainstream media outlets.
Van Hollen, a Biden ally, pointed to the president’s State of the Union address in March during which he delivered a vociferous defense of his record, a speech many supporters touted to suggest worries over his age and mental acuity were overblown. Those concerns will be front and center again after Biden and Trump agreed Wednesday to a June 27 debate hosted by CNN and a Sept. 10 debate hosted by ABC News.
“I do not have concerns. I mean, there were people who said they were concerned about the State of the Union address. He came out swinging, he delivered a very clear message to the American people,” Van Hollen told “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz.
“Look, it’s not about the age of the candidate. It’s about the ideas [of] the candidate, what they’re going to do for the American people going forward,” he added. “Donald Trump is all about revenge, he’s all about the past. Joe Biden is about fighting for the American people and putting forward an agenda for the people.”
Biden and Trump debated twice during their 2020 race, with the first clash a largely chaotic affair followed by a more serious forum after more intense moderator intervention.
This time, the terms the Biden campaign demanded include having no audience and allowing moderators the flexibility to cut off mics for the candidates, including when they’re not speaking.
“I think this is an advantage to the American people. They want the candidates [to] focus on issues, on the economy, on foreign policy,” Van Hollen said. “What Donald Trump likes is a carnival-like atmosphere. He’s more of an entertainer than a serious debater on the issues. And so, I think this helps the American people crystallize the choice.”
6 months out, a tight presidential race with battle between issues and attributes: POLL Still, Van Hollen said he would recommend Biden not hold back if Trump is perceived to cross a line during the debate. Biden asked, “Will you shut up, man?” during a 2020 debate when Trump began interrupting him.
“You have to show the human side of people,” Van Hollen said. “… I can understand the president of the United States responding and letting him know that’s what he thinks.
Republicans, meanwhile, think the debates hand Trump an advantage.
Challenges for Trump and Biden emerge even as both cruise: Exit polls Polls have shown voters trust Trump more than Biden on issues that most concern them, including the economy and immigration.
“I think the choice is going to be clear in this election, and I think people will see it on that debate stage in June,” Marc Lotter, a former Trump-Pence campaign official, told Raddatz on Sunday. “Donald Trump, I think it’s basically a strategy of reality and real life. The reality is that people are struggling in real life to pay for groceries and gas, the open border problem, crime, the wars raging around the world.”
Lotter also nodded to concerns over Biden’s age, noting a debate is different from a State of the Union address and that Trump often speaks off the cuff to reporters and large crowds of supporters.
“I think the American people need to see Donald Trump and Joe Biden side by side,” he said. “This is not a Joe Biden that can shield himself with his staff walking to Marine One or take the short stairs or use a teleprompter. This is going to be live recall, and Donald Trump gets up there two or three times a weekend and pontificates for 90 minutes. Joe Biden rarely does an actual hard interview. This is going to be a challenge for President Biden.”
(MONTGOMERY, Ala.) — Alabama State University is partnering with private equity firm Neuberger Berman to manage the school’s $125 million endowment – making it the largest such partnership between a Wall Street firm and a public historically Black college and university (HBCU) ever.
The new relationship is a “blessing,” according to ASU President Quinton T. Ross, Jr. He called the partnership overwhelmingly impactful for ASU.
“Through this partnership with Neuberger Berman, not only do we look at the long term stability of the institution, but also the investment in students who will be receiving scholarships for generations to come,” Ross said. “Because of monies generated by our endowment, because of this partnership, we ensure that students are able to benefit from what we’re doing.”
Ross is confident both scholarships and internships will benefit current students like rising junior Kayleigh Dunn. The finance major said she is still pinching herself after landing a coveted summer job at the firm in New York City.
That dream job, Dunn said, will allow her to merge interests in equity and personal finance. Both her dad and grandparents attended the school, so she wants to show that HBCU students have long deserved these opportunities.
“I feel like HBCU students are coming hard,” she said. “We know the work we can do. And we know if we get a chance to be there, and we get a chance to put our best foot forward, we’re going to make waves.”
As higher education faces a watershed moment with attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion and the Supreme Court’s elimination of race-based admissions, Ross said the partnership excites the ASU community.
“Longevity is in our DNA and through that we have to continue to wave the banner to let them know that HBCUs really are the greatest thing that happened within the African American community when you look at the production of powerful citizens across this nation,” he said.
Ross told ABC News attaining financial wealth management from the sixth largest private equity firm in the world will also address decades of underfunding
“As the endowment grows, we will be able to use some of those funds, not only for scholarships, but also to help to secure and stabilize our infrastructure,” he said, adding “That’s why it’s necessary to make sure that you have the right partner [Neuberger Berman] with the right vision, because they can move along with you in that time of growth.”
Dominique Baker, associate professor of education and public policy at the University of Delaware, said the partnership is unique for HBCUs.
“Public HBCUs have been denied their rightful funding from the state and the federal government for a significant period of time,” Baker said. “And so getting these types of fund managers is not enough when it comes to thinking about the type of funding support that public HBCUs should be receiving,” she added.
Meanwhile, Neuberger Berman Private Wealth Adviser Xavier Peoples said he is helping invest ASU’s endowment so the school reaches its long-term financial goals.
Issuing a call for support from more companies, Peoples told ABC News “when HBCUs do well, America does well.”
“When HBCUs do better, when their endowments do better, America does better,” he said. “It gives America a greater [pool] of college graduates that can come in to our workforce. Wall Street firms should be all in on working with historically Black colleges and universities and helping their endowments to be the best that they can be.”
(WASHINGTON) — Angela Alsobrooks emerged as the victor in a bruising Democratic Senate primary in Maryland — and now the state’s Democratic Party faces the challenge of reuniting to take on a formidable Republican opponent in the general election.
Alsobrooks, a county executive in a Maryland suburb outside the nation’s capital, defeated Rep. David Trone and now faces the daunting task of taking on a popular Republican challenger, Larry Hogan, a two-term former GOP governor.
While Maryland is a deep blue state, Alsobrooks is not on a glide path to a Senate win. Experts tell ABC News that Democrats, wounded in the Alsobrooks-Trone battle, needs to realign to take on Hogan — with nothing short of control of the U.S. Senate at stake.
Both Alsobrooks and Trone sounded a conciliatory note in their election night speeches on Tuesday, signaling a hope to mend the party and keep the Senate seat — vacated by retiring Democratic Sen. Ben Cardin — in Democratic hands.
“I want you to know we are united in order to keep the Senate blue,” Alsobrooks said.
Trone urged his supporters to “come together to support the Democratic Party so we can hold this U.S. Senate.”
The Maryland Democratic Party is also showcasing what it says is a unified front, releasing statements from members of Maryland’s congressional delegation and from local leaders praising Alsobrooks and Trone. One of those statements came from Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, D-Md., who had endorsed Trone, but now urged Democrats to band together to not let “Mitch McConnell’s handpicked candidate turn control of the U.S. Senate over to Republicans.”
Former Democratic state party chair Yvette Lewis told ABC News that the grassroots work to bridge the gap between the candidates’ supporters began right after the primary.
“People started making phone calls and mending fences [on Wednesday] — I was a part of that — to make sure that everybody knows that the primary is over, and that it’s time for us to come together for the general election,” Lewis said.
“You can’t just brush people aside and say, OK, this is over. Now it’s time to come to the table … What you have to do is validate them, validate their work and thank them for the work that they did. And then welcome them to this new coalition.”
Susan Turnbull, another former state party chair for the Maryland Democratic Party, expressed similar optimism: “What we do in Maryland, is work as Team Maryland,” she told ABC News.
One official who endorsed Trone, Prince George’s County State’s Attorney Aisha Braveboy, said she’s “eager to rally behind [Alsobrooks] to retain control of the Senate and ensure Maryland remains blue.”
Michael Hanmer, director of the Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement at the University of Maryland, told ABC News that Trone and Alsobrooks must now work together to show party unity.
“Another key piece of strategy is not just to get Trone to say nice things and be supportive in words [about Alsobrooks], but to go out and work with Alsobrooks … rather than just be on the sidelines,” Hanmer said.
Alsobrooks and Trone’s campaigns did not respond to a request for comment from ABC News about their next steps after the primary.
Lewis said that Trone supporters can be a vital part of Alsobrooks’ success as well.
“We want them to canvass, we want to phone bank, we want them to help us raise the money … we want them to be part of the entire process,” she said.
Alsobrooks wasted no time as the newly-minted Democratic nominee in aiming criticism at Hogan, reminding supporters of the stakes for Democrats in their upcoming battle.
“The fight ahead will not be easy. There are a lot of people in our state who say, ‘Oh you know it’s Maryland. It’s a blue state. We can worry about another race someplace else …’ but it will only stay a blue state if we put in the work,” Alsobrooks said at her election night event.
Hogan, speaking to supporters on Tuesday night, said he already anticipated the politicking ahead.
“Over the next few months, you are going to hear a whole lot more of this political BS, and Marylanders are going to be inundated with scare tactics and false attacks. Don’t let them get away with it,” he said.
Hanmer anticipates that Democrats will need to articulate how they feel Hogan will be different as a senator — and a potential deciding vote in the chamber — than during his time as governor working with a Democratic-controlled legislature. He said it will be a challenge to get people to rethink their approach to Hogan, who won the governor job by about 5 points in 2014 and 12 points in 2018, and he left with sky-high approval ratings.
Hanmer said Democrats face a challenge in that Alsobrooks doesn’t have as much statewide recognition as Hogan.
“[Alsobrooks] hasn’t had a statewide position before, so I think there’s still going to be a lot of people that need to get to know her.”
