NH woman who asked Trump about abortion at town hall: ‘He didn’t actually answer me’

NH woman who asked Trump about abortion at town hall: ‘He didn’t actually answer me’
NH woman who asked Trump about abortion at town hall: ‘He didn’t actually answer me’
CNN

(MERRIMACK, N.H.) — As New Hampshire Republican voters cheered on former President Donald Trump at CNN’s town hall Wednesday night, there was one questioner who stood out.

Julie Miles, a registered nurse for more than 20 years, living in Merrimack, New Hampshire, wanted to know how Trump felt about abortion rights after the Supreme Court overruled decades of precedent in the landmark case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

A registered Republican, Miles had voted for Trump twice but was now undecided. She doesn’t chalk up her indecision to the abortion issue — “I’m not a one-issue voter,” she told ABC News in an interview Thursday. But, Miles said, she thinks Republican candidates should make clear where they stand given the stakes involved.

So, with the president in front of her, Miles stood up and asked a question she said was on behalf of the millions of women voters out there she said would be wondering the same thing: “How do you plan to appeal to women voters in New Hampshire who are concerned about the Dobbs decision and how states may change their laws?”

It’s one of many questions expected to follow Trump and other Republican candidates into 2024, including whether a future GOP president would embrace a proposed nationwide 15-week ban on abortion, what medical conditions qualify as a life-saving emergency, and if a woman in her third trimester should be forced to carry to term a non-viable pregnancy.

When confronted by Miles, Trump called it a “great question” — then dodged in answering it.

The former president took credit for nominating Supreme Court justices who delivered the Dobbs decision, saying he gave the anti-abortion rights movement “something to negotiate with” and that he was able to pull off what other Republican presidents couldn’t.

“Deals are being made. Deals are going to be made,” Trump told Miles.

Trump also falsely accused Democrats of wanting to “rip the baby out of the womb at the end of the ninth month” — a mischaracterization of the Democratic position on abortion. Last year, Senate Democrats tried to push a constitutional standard that allows states to restrict abortions after a fetus is likely to survive outside the womb, but with exceptions for risks to maternal life or health.

At one point, the former president did note that he believed in exceptions to abortion restrictions for anyone who is a victim or rape or incest or if their life is at risk.

But when pressed by CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, the moderator, on whether he would sign legislation imposing a 15-week federal ban on abortion, Trump repeatedly wouldn’t answer.

“What I’ll do is negotiate so that people are happy,” he said.

That answer left Miles unsatisfied.

“He didn’t actually answer me,” she later told ABC News.

Advocates weren’t satisfied either. Groups on both sides panned his non-answer, including one prominent anti-abortion rights group who said they want a candidate who will commit to a federal ban of 15 weeks with the option for states to enact tougher restrictions.

“We’re looking for a leader on life. Someone who will commit to being a national defender of life and as part of that commitment they need to support” the 15-week standard, said E.V. Osment, vice president of communications for SBA Pro-Life America.

But Republicans could risk alienating independent and moderate voters that don’t embrace a federal ban. According to an ABC NewsWashington Post poll released Tuesday, 78% of Americans say the decision to have an abortion should be left up to a woman and her doctor rather than regulated by law. Among women, that sentiment is particularly strong: 71% of women say they oppose the Dobbs ruling.

For Miles, she said she sees abortion as “a very personal decision between a doctor, a woman and her family” and says “the bottom line is the federal government should not dictate” that decision. And, she said, she’s also hoping New Hampshire GOP Gov. Chris Sununu might jump in the race. Sununu backed a 24-week ban on most abortions with the exception of fatal fetal abnormalities — a law that essentially allows the vast majority of abortions to occur up until the point of fetal viability.

How might other women see Trump’s response? What would another Trump term mean when it comes to abortion?

“They’d still have the same question,” Miles said.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Daniel Penny, man who choked subway rider Jordan Neely, to face manslaughter charge: DA

Daniel Penny, man who choked subway rider Jordan Neely, to face manslaughter charge: DA
Daniel Penny, man who choked subway rider Jordan Neely, to face manslaughter charge: DA
Alexi Rosenfeld/Getty Images

(NEW YORK) — Daniel Penny is expected to turn himself in as soon as Friday to face criminal charges in connection with the chokehold death of Jordan Neely aboard an F train, according to the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

“We can confirm that Daniel Penny will be arrested on a charge of Manslaughter in the Second Degree,” a spokesperson for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said. “We cannot provide any additional information until he has been arraigned in Manhattan Criminal Court, which we expect to take place tomorrow.”

Neely died following a chokehold on May 1. Video showed Penny, a Marine veteran, putting Neely in a chokehold following outbursts from Neely on the train.

Neely was homeless at the time of his death. Some witnesses reportedly told police that Neely was yelling and harassing passengers on the train, authorities said.

Police sources told ABC News that Penny was not specifically being threatened by Neely when he intervened and that Neely had not become violent and had not been threatening anyone in particular.

Attorneys for Penny offered “condolences to those close to Mr. Neely” and claimed “Mr. Neely began aggressively threatening Daniel,” and that the Marine veteran and others “acted to protect themselves.”

“Mr. Neely had a documented history of violent and erratic behavior, the apparent result of ongoing and untreated mental illness,” said the statement from the law firm of Raiser and Kenniff. “When Mr. Neely began aggressively threatening Daniel Penny and the other passengers, Daniel, with the help of others, acted to protect themselves, until help arrived. Daniel never intended to harm Mr. Neely and could not have foreseen his untimely death.”

In footage of the incident, Penny can be seen holding Neely in a chokehold for nearly 3 minutes, as another man held down Neely’s body.

The Neely family attorneys criticized Penny’s response.

“The truth is, he knew nothing about Jordan’s history when he intentionally wrapped his arms around Jordan’s neck, and squeezed and kept squeezing,” the Neely family attorneys said in a statement.

“Daniel Penny’s press release is not an apology nor an expression of regret. It is a character assassination, and a clear example of why he believed he was entitled to take Jordan’s life,” the statement from attorneys Donte Mills and Lennon Edwards continued.

Neely’s death following the chokehold has been ruled a homicide by the city’s medical examiner’s office.

Penny, 24, was questioned by detectives and released, according to police. He told police he was not trying to kill Neely.

According to police sources, Neely had a documented mental health history. Neely had been previously arrested for several incidents on the subway, though it’s unclear how many, if any, led to convictions.

The maximum penalty for second-degree manslaughter is 15 years.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Trump signals intent to appeal verdict in E. Jean Carroll case

Trump signals intent to appeal verdict in E. Jean Carroll case
Trump signals intent to appeal verdict in E. Jean Carroll case
Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

(NEW YORK) — Former President Donald Trump has signaled his intent to appeal the verdict in the civil lawsuit brought by writer E. Jean Carroll, according to a court filing Thursday.

Trump filed a notice of appeal, a precursor to a formal appeal to come with the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Trump was found liable for battery and defamation and ordered to pay Carroll $5 million in damages after a jury decided he sexually abused the former Elle magazine columnist and then defamed her.

Carroll, who brought the lawsuit in November, alleged that Trump defamed her in his 2022 Truth Social post by calling her allegations “a Hoax and a lie” and saying “This woman is not my type!” when he denied her claim that Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the 1990s.

Carroll added a charge of battery under a recently adopted New York law that allows adult survivors of sexual abuse to sue their alleged attacker regardless of the statute of limitations. Trump has denied all allegations that he raped Carroll or defamed her.

Trump’s attorney, Joe Tacopina, previously signaled his intent to appeal on grounds related to evidence and judicial fairness.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Elon Musk says he has chosen new Twitter CEO, will step down within weeks

Elon Musk says he has chosen new Twitter CEO, will step down within weeks
Elon Musk says he has chosen new Twitter CEO, will step down within weeks
JasonDoiy/Getty Images

(SAN FRANCISCO) — Elon Musk has chosen a new CEO of Twitter and plans to step down from the role within about six weeks, the billionaire entrepreneur said on Thursday.

Musk, who runs Tesla and Space X, did not disclose the identity of the incoming chief executive. He said he plans to transition to a role as executive chairman and chief technology officer, in which he’ll focus on “overseeing product.”

The announcement comes months after Musk pledged in December to step down as the head of Twitter as soon as he found someone “foolish enough to take the job.”

Musk’s tentative resignation late last year followed a Twitter poll posted by Musk in which 57.5% of respondents called on him to stop leading the company.

After acquiring Twitter in October, Musk made major changes to the company and its platform. In an effort to significantly slash costs, the company has cut roughly 75% of its 7,500-person workforce, raising concerns about Twitter’s capacity to maintain its platform.

Twitter suffered a user outage in February that lasted for hours and required an emergency fix, prompting an apology from the company.

Musk has also sought to rejuvenate the platform’s subscription offering as a means of supplementing its advertising revenue. Under Twitter’s new subscription, users gain access to account verification — the site’s signature blue checkmark — for an $8 monthly fee, which amounts to $96 per year.

Previously, Twitter verified celebrities, politicians, journalists and prominent figures on a case-by-case basis in an effort to authenticate their identities and prevent impersonation.

Twitter partially reversed the subscription change last month by reverifying some legacy accounts, including accounts affiliated with basketball star Lebron James and author Stephen King.

Musk has defended his actions at Twitter as part of an aggressive effort to rescue the company from financial peril, which he described in a Twitter Spaces interview in December as an “emergency fire drill.”

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

McCarthy-backed border bill passes House hours before Title 42 ends

McCarthy-backed border bill passes House hours before Title 42 ends
McCarthy-backed border bill passes House hours before Title 42 ends
Drew Angerer/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — The House voted to pass a sweeping border security and immigration bill on Thursday evening, just hours before the Trump-era immigration order– Title 42– expires at midnight.

The sweeping border security and immigration bill passed by a vote of 219-213. Two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and John Duarte of California, joined all Democrats in voting against the legislation.

The bill will likely die in the Democrat-controlled Senate, and the White House has issued a veto threat.

The legislation, which House Speaker Kevin McCarthy called the “strongest border security bill to come through Congress in more than 100 years,” would increase penalties for individuals who overstay their visas and bolster the number of Border Patrol agents.

H.R. 2, known as the “Secure the Border Act,” also restarts border wall construction and reinstates the “remain in Mexico” policy that required some asylum-seekers to be sent back to Mexico during immigration proceedings.

“If it passes, I am confident that we will stop the flood of fentanyl into our country, solve the Biden Border Crisis, and support our border patrol agents so they can continue to keep us safe,” McCarthy said on the House floor prior to the vote.

Republicans are scrambling to strengthen immigration policy ahead of the end of Title 42. The Trump-era policy, which allowed for border agents to expel upward of two million migrants from the border during the COVID-19 pandemic, is set to lift at 11:59 pm after months of complicated legal and political battles. Democrats argue the bill is “extreme” and does not increase border security.

“This extreme MAGA Republican piece of legislation will throw out your children who are fleeing, in many cases, extreme violence and persecution. They will build a medieval border wall… The child deportation act is not a serious effort to deal with the issue related to our broken immigration system.,” Leader Hakeem Jeffries said at a press conference Thursday.

The White House said the bill does not address “the root causes of migration” and “does very little to actually increase border security while doing a great deal to trample on the nation’s core values and international obligations, it should be rejected.”

The Biden administration has instead revealed a sweeping version of border restrictions that it said would “humanely manage the border” when Title 42 lifts.

Under the finalized policy, migrants will be required to either first apply for protection in a third country or apply for admission via the CBP One App while also presenting at a legitimate port of entry to be considered, according to one Biden administration official.

The vote on the House proposal comes after months of negotiations within the GOP conference to hash out policy differences. On Wednesday, House members and leaders met behind closed doors for hours, making last-minute significant changes to the 213-page bill in an effort to secure enough votes for passage. The bill joins proposals from the House Judiciary, Foreign Affairs and Homeland Security committees.

When Title 42 expires at 11:59 p.m. ET Thursday, officials will immediately return to processing under existing Title 8 guidelines. Title 42 has been used more than 2.8 million times to expel migrants since its implementation in March 2020.

ABC News’ Isabella Murray and Katherine Faulders contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

George Santos fraud charges ‘very egregious,’ defense attorney says

George Santos fraud charges ‘very egregious,’ defense attorney says
George Santos fraud charges ‘very egregious,’ defense attorney says
ABC News

(WASHINGTON) — Embattled Congressman George Santos, R-N.Y., was indicted on 13 criminal counts, including seven counts of wire fraud Wednesday and has defied calls to resign from office.

Federal prosecutors have accused him of defrauding donors and illegally receiving unemployment benefits during the pandemic.

Defense attorney and former Assistant Manhattan District Attorney Jeremy Saland spoke with ABC News Live Wednesday to discuss the charges.

ABC NEWS LIVE: Let’s just start with your reaction to the substance of this 13-count, 19-page indictment against Santos. And I want to first focus on the charges of donor fraud. How significant are those charges of using donor funds for personal benefit?

JEREMY SALAND: From what I understand from reading the indictment, is he really, for lack of a term, duped the public and arguably knowingly so… intentionally. So to use those monies for himself, it’s very egregious. The dollar amount may not be as egregious as we’ve seen in the past, but it’s a constant ongoing scheme that I think really puts him in the most danger.

ABC NEWS LIVE: Yeah, and that’s no doubt going to resonate with voters, as well. I’m wondering about improperly receiving unemployment benefits as well, because a lot of people in this country so rely on that and what the charges he was actually making money while he was receiving those benefits.

SALAND: You’re not going to make any friends and help your defense when you are scheming, as alleged, you are scheming to take money when people were at their most vulnerable and most desperate and needed those dollars to pay for their family’s mortgage, to pay for food on the table, [and] to keep businesses afloat. And every time, every week that Mr. Santos allegedly have signed off and said, “I’m unemployed, I’m unemployed, I’m unemployed,” and then collecting those dollars, even though it’s only in the tens of thousands, it’s offensive to the average American and rightfully so.

ABC NEWS LIVE: I know from covering cases like this that the public integrity unit will move quickly if they have the evidence. But I’m wondering, were you surprised by the speed of this investigation and the indictment? And what, if anything, do you think that says about the government’s case?

SALAND: You don’t know when this ultimately started, [or] when initiated. I think the government started to look into Mr. Santos once his lies were being revealed. And there’s been so many lies, not necessarily in the four corners of this indictment, but in terms of his conduct. So it doesn’t shock me that we’re at this point, some might argue what took so long, but the government seems to have a very strong case, at least for some of the charges, if not most of them.

Again, there [are] records and records don’t lie. Records tell the truth. And if he was collecting, for example, as we just discussed before, unemployment benefits, but at the same time depositing checks into his bank account for work, there’s really no defense to that. It speaks for itself.

ABC NEWS LIVE: So we heard Santos after leaving the courthouse today. I’m sure you saw some of that. And if you didn’t, he basically stood there in front of a gaggle of reporters and said this was the beginning of his ability to address the charges and defend himself while calling this a familiar term — a witch hunt. What did you make of his remarks, his demeanor at the time of his remarks and how he’s handling this publicly?

SALAND: This was sort of the Donald Trump peacock feather defense, “Look at me and I’m the victim here.” And it shocks me that an attorney would allow his client or her client to be so open and start saying things without having control. Because he came across as cavalier [and] arrogant. I think he said something about, this will be my book. I’m going to stay in Congress. It’s a witch hunt. Again, talking points with Donald Trump. He did himself no favors. He seemed to relish the moment, arguably, which does not really do anything for him before a judge, if there’s a conviction, to sentence him well beyond the guidelines or less than the guidelines. So he really was foolish.

ABC NEWS LIVE: If you were his defense attorney, what kind of credible defense could Santos mount based on the charges against him and based on the lies we know to be true so far?

SALAND: They are starting a three-legged race, which is difficult enough with no legs, well behind everybody. It’s extremely difficult because…the papers don’t lie. The potential witnesses, we talk about these people in the indictment, there’s a lot that he has to deal with.

But the government, when they go after a legislator, they’re very serious about it. And they do their homework.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Georgia’s Fort Benning renamed Fort Moore

Georgia’s Fort Benning renamed Fort Moore
Georgia’s Fort Benning renamed Fort Moore
Bo Zaunders/Getty Images

(COLUMBUS, Ga.) — The U.S. Army training base formerly known as Fort Benning was renamed Fort Moore on Thursday to honor a late lieutenant general and his wife and remove ties to a Confederate general.

The ceremony to rededicate the base to Lt. Gen. Harold “Hal” G. Moore Jr. and Julia “Julie” Moore was held at the Doughboy Stadium near Columbus, Georgia. Their children were present as officials honored the “We Were Soldiers Once and Young” author and his wife as part of a broader campaign to rename bases that commemorated the Confederacy.

“Together, Hal and Julie Moore embodied the very best of our military and our nation, and the renaming of this installation as Fort Moore is a fitting tribute to their lifelong dedication to the army and its soldiers and their families,” said Maj. Gen. Curtis Buzzard, who added that Moore was a “courageous leader who served with distinction” in World War II, Korea and Vietnam.

While Moore was applauded for his distinguished career across the three conflicts, speakers at the ceremony emphasized that his wife was instrumental to his success.

“General Moore accomplished many things in his life, but none would have been possible without the love and support of his wife Julie,” Buzzard said at the ceremony. “Much like her husband Julie Moore was a visionary. A crusader of seeing things done right.”

Julia Moore was a proud military wife who worked with the American Red Cross, advocated for military families and spearheaded changes at the Pentagon, according to the speakers at the event.

“She had a hand in improving services for spouses and family. Her leadership and commitment to supporting soldiers and their families led to the development of what we now know today as Army Community Services and the modern-day casualty notification process,” Buzzard said.

The couple’s son, Col. David Moore, served for 27 years before his retirement and described himself as “proud to be an Army brat.”

“Our family is deeply grateful that our parents will be honored, remembered and held as role models for the generations of Army soldiers in these stands and to come,” he said at the ceremony. “They loved each other. They loved us. They loved the Army and their beloved troopers, so much so that my father’s last wish was to be buried among his troopers here at the post cemetery — the same troopers, my mother referred to as their sons and brothers and with whom she is buried as well.”

The renaming of Fort Benning is part of national campaign to change the names of nine U.S. Army installations, as recommended by the Naming Commission’s panel to erase symbols that commemorate the Confederate States of America. On Tuesday, the U.S. Army base formerly known as Fort Hood in central Texas was changed to Fort Cavazos, and Fort Lee was renamed Fort Gregg-Adams in April, among other changes.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

FDA drops blood donation restrictions specific to gay and bisexual men

FDA drops blood donation restrictions specific to gay and bisexual men
FDA drops blood donation restrictions specific to gay and bisexual men
Paul Bersebach/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — The Food and Drug Administration has dropped all restrictions specific to gay and bisexual men donating blood, a move long anticipated by public health experts and gay rights activists.

The new guidance, first proposed in January and finalized Thursday, will not restrict donations based on someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity, and instead move towards an “individual risk-based” approach to reduce the risk of accidental HIV infection through the blood donation system.

The FDA originally banned donations from gay and bisexual men in the midst of the 1980s HIV/AIDS crisis. In recent years, the FDA relaxed these rules, but had not lifted them completely.

Now, the new blood donation risk assessment will be the same for every donor regardless of how they identify.

It’s a move that public health experts and advocates have long argued for. Advocates say the HIV crisis has changed significantly since the 1980s, undercutting the rationale for restrictions based on sexual orientation. For example, the HIV epidemic has spread far beyond gay and bisexual men, with women accounting for roughly 1 in 5 new HIV diagnoses in the United States, according to the most recent CDC data available.

Meanwhile, testing of the blood supply improved, dramatically reducing the risk of blood-borne transmission through the blood donation system.

“This change reflects advancements in molecular tests as well as the accrual of reassuring data from other countries that implemented similar individual behavior (not population) based testing,” said Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious disease specialist at the University of California, San Francisco.

In 2015, the FDA relaxed an outright ban on donations from gay and bisexual men, but the 2015 guidance asked men to abstain from sex for at least one year before donation.

Under Thursday’s finalized guidance, every prospective donor will be asked about their sexual history within the past three months – regardless of their sexual orientation. If they report a new sexual partner, more than one sexual partner, or having anal sex, they will be deferred. In addition, any person who takes HIV medications intended to treat or prevent infection will be deferred.

The FDA says this move could expand the pool of people eligible to donate blood.

“As a physician I feel a sense of relief, this will likely lead to the increased supply and availability of a vital resource needed for life saving and life sustaining treatment,” said Dr. Darien Sutton, an emergency medical physician and ABC News contributor.

In a press release, the FDA said it has “carefully reviewed numerous data sources” that give the agency “a solid foundation to support this new policy.” The FDA said it strongly believes this new recommendation will not compromise the safety of the blood supply.

In prepared remarks, Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s CBER division that handles blood donations, said the new recommendations “represent a significant milestone for the agency and the LGBTQI+ community.”

Chin-Hong added, “As a doctor I enthusiastically welcome this news … Above all, this is a victory of science over stigma.”

“The FDA’s decision to follow science and issue new recommendations for all Americans, regardless of sexual orientation, who selflessly donate blood to help save lives, signals the beginning of the end of a dark and discriminatory past rooted in fear and homophobia,” Sarah Kate Ellis, the president and CEO of GLAAD, said in a statement Thursday.

Ellis, however, took issue with one part of the updated recommendation, which urges deferral for anyone taking HIV medications — including people who are HIV negative who are taking medications called PrEP to prevent infection.

The deferral period could continue to erect barriers to LGBTQ blood donors, she said.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Border facilities reach overcapacity in most areas, chief says

Border facilities reach overcapacity in most areas, chief says
Border facilities reach overcapacity in most areas, chief says
Jose Torres/Agencia Press South/Getty Images

(EL PASO, Texas) — U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities in most regions along the southern border are over capacity even as the number of those in custody has declined, Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz said Wednesday.

As of Wednesday, there were 26,354 people in CBP custody, which Ortiz said was, “several thousand less” compared to earlier in the morning.

Five of the nine Border Patrol sectors in the southwest were over 125% capacity.

“But that means that there are four sectors that aren’t,” Ortiz said, adding that Border Patrol has been flying migrants from high-traffic areas to facilities with more capacity.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was peppered by questions from reporters at a White House briefing Thursday about whether the administration was prepared for the end of the Title 42 migrant expulsion policy.

“We could see very crowded – as we are now – we could see very crowded Border Patrol facilities,” Mayorkas said. “I cannot overstate the strain on our personnel and our facilities, but we know how to manage through such strain, as difficult as it will be. I have tremendous confidence and pride in our personnel.”

From the Mexico side of the border in Ciudad Juarez, however, the number migrants crossing into the El Paso area has declined since the weekend.

“The officials in Texas and other places in the US are exaggerating what is happening here for political reasons. There is no crisis here at the moment,” a city government spokesperson said. “We’ve had many other immigration waves that were far more impactful, when all of our shelter space was full and people were on the streets.”

Overall, Ortiz said authorities are tracking around 65K migrants in northern areas of Mexico and that the surge CBP has been expecting may soon subside.

“The increase that we have seen in the last 5 to 7 days was really the surge … I think that what we see now is a continued effort by some to message incorrectly that once Title 42 goes away, it’s going to be a free for all along the border,” Ortiz said. “I don’t see that being the case. Our agents will be out there performing their duties.”

Title 42, the pandemic-era policy which allowed the U.S. to expel upward of two million migrants from the border, expires Thursday.

Currently, 4,000 beds remain open in Ciudad Juarez shelters — well below 50% capacity. That number has been dropping for two weeks and continues to fall.

Ortiz said he believes the administration has shifted to a strategy that prioritizes enforcement and shows migrants the consequences of crossing illegally.

Asked whether heavy-handed measures were necessary for migrants sleeping in the streets of El Paso, Ortiz stood by his approach.

“It wasn’t about chasing people around down the streets, into churches, into a protected areas,” Ortiz said. “It was a very methodical approach. And I was very proud of everyone.”

Under the direction of the secretary, Customs and Border Protection is relying on new features in a mobile phone app called CBP One to schedule appointments for migrants on the border.

About 740 migrants with appointments are arriving at federal border facilities each day, Secretary Mayorkas said on Thursday. The number of appointments is a small fraction of those who have attempted to cross on a daily basis in recent years. CBP is working to expand appointments to 1,000 per day, but with the end of Title 42 just hours away, it might not be enough.

“The greatest level of frustration is actually being able to make the appointment, not the utility of the CBP One app itself,” Mayorkas said. “That is again, another example of a broken immigration system.”

Migrant crossings have at times exceeded 10,000 in a single day, Mayorkas said. He blamed Congress for an immigration system that does not have the capacity to handle everyone seeking to enter the U.S.

“Our current situation is the outcome of Congress leaving a broken, outdated immigration system in place for over two decades, despite unanimous agreement that we desperately need legislative reform,” Mayorkas said.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

New York AG sues gun company over device used by Buffalo mass shooter

New York AG sues gun company over device used by Buffalo mass shooter
New York AG sues gun company over device used by Buffalo mass shooter
Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

(ALBANY, N.Y.) — A Georgia company that made a gun accessory the shooter in the 2022 Buffalo grocery store massacre used to modify his AR-15 rifle into “an even deadlier” weapon is being accused in a civil lawsuit filed Thursday by New York Attorney General Letitia James of aiding and abetting in the racially-motivated rampage that killed 10 Black people.

James is suing Mean Arms, which makes, sells and distributes a device meant to lock a magazine filled with ammunition onto a semiautomatic rifle, like the one authorities said Payton Gendron used to fatally shoot his victims at the Tops store on the east side of Buffalo.

The lawsuit, filed nearly a year after the May 14, 2022, mass shooting, alleges the company falsely advertised that the device, known as an MA Lock, makes the weapon legal in New York, but also contains instructions on how to remove the lock, thereby aiding Gendron’s modification of the gun into one that is illegal to possess in the state. According to the lawsuit, the lock can easily be removed so that detachable magazines, including high-capacity magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition and are illegal in New York, can be inserted into a rifle.

The lawsuit includes a photo of the device’s packaging with instructions for removing the device.

“We lost 10 innocent lives because a hate-fueled individual was able to make an AR-15 even deadlier through a simple change at home,” James said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. “Mean Arms sells the MA Lock device knowing that it can be easily removed to make guns more dangerous, and even gives directions on how to take this action. We cannot undo the devastating harm that was done, but this lawsuit against Mean Arms is part of our ongoing effort to pursue justice for the ten innocent lives that were unjustly taken,” the statement said.

Mean Arms has not responded to ABC News’ request for comment.

According to the lawsuit, Gendron purchased a used AR-15 that had an MA Lock installed in January 2022. According the lawsuit and to writings Gendron posted online and reviewed by investigators, Gendron removed the MA Lock within a few minutes at home, using a power drill with a #2 speed out drill bit, the same tool advised in Mean Arms’ removal instructions.

On the day of the mass shooting, the shooter inserted multiple 30-round detachable magazines to his weapon. With a pistol grip and the high-capacity magazines, he did not have to stop to reload and when he did reload, he could do so quickly, adding to the deadliness of the attack, the lawsuit said.

Gendron pleaded guilty to multiple counts of murder and a state charge of domestic terrorism motivated by hate and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. He awaits prosecution on federal charges that could include the death penalty.

The lawsuit seeks to stop Mean Arms from doing business in New York and to require the company to pay restitution, damages and civil penalties. The lawsuit also seeks to require the company to issue corrective statements regarding their allegedly false and misleading public statements on the MA Lock.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.