(DETROIT) — As the strike deadline set by the United Auto Workers union approaches, negotiations with the Big Three automakers are making “slow” progress, with at least one meeting planned for Wednesday, said Shawn Fain, president of the union.
“Can we get there? Yes, we can, but they need to buckle down and get busy. We’ve got 48 hours. That’s not a lot of time,” Fain said on “Good Morning America” on Wednesday.
Members in several states have threatened to walk off their jobs in the coming days unless auto companies meet their demands over higher wages and more robust benefits.
The deadline the union has set for negotiations with three automakers — General Motors, Ford and Stellantis — is midnight eastern on Thursday. About 150,000 members work at the three companies.
Such a strike would be “devastating” for the U.S. auto industry and overall economy, Jim Farley, CEO of Ford Motor Company, told ABC News on Tuesday evening with just 48 hours to go in negotiations.
“We are putting forth an offer today that’s the most lucrative offer in 80 years working with the UAW,” he said.
Some union members have been struggling as executives “make out like bandits,” Fain said in an earlier statement. “The Big Three have been breaking the bank while we have been breaking our backs.”
Fain on Wednesday said a strike would be more likely to wreck the “billionaire economy,” rather than the overall economy.
“It’s interesting to me all of a sudden the fear mongers get out there and start talking about how this is going to wreck the economy. It’s not going to wreck the economy. It’s going to wreck the billionaire economy,” he said.
He added, “That’s the big issue here. Especially in this country. The working class is being living payheck to pay check and feeding off the scraps.”
ABC News’ Meredith Deliso, Imtiyaz Delawala, Anna Katharine Ping, Linsey Davis and Rahma Ahmed contributed to this story.
(NEW YORK) — Consumer prices rose 3.7% in August compared to a year ago, marking the second consecutive month of increased inflation and suggesting a bumpy path in the effort to bring inflation back down to normal levels, government data on Wednesday showed.
The fresh data follows an uptick in July that reversed some of the progress achieved in the fight to cut price increases and offer relief for household budgets.
The data exceeded economist expectations that consumer prices would have increased 3.6% in August compared to a year ago, an increase from the inflation rate recorded in July. That month, the inflation rate ticked up on a year-over-year basis for the first time since last summer.
Inflation stands well below its peak last year of over 9% but remains more than a percentage point higher than the Federal Reserve’s target rate.
Core inflation — a measure that strips out volatile food and energy prices — rose 4.3% in July compared to a year ago, in part because gasoline prices were a major contributor to the jump in overall inflation.
Consumer prices increased a significant 0.6% in August compared to the previous month, far outpacing the month-over-month inflation rate in July, according to the data released on Thursday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
An increase in gasoline prices contributed to more than half of the month-to-month price increases, the data showed. The national average price of a gallon of gas stands at $3.85, AAA data said.
Price increases for food and housing also contributed to the inflation spike compared with last month.
The prices of some grocery store items remain well above the overall inflation rate. The price of biscuits and rolls rose 7% in August compared to a year ago; while the price of cookies rose 8% and uncooked beef rose 10%.
At the Federal Reserve’s most recent meeting in July, the central bank raised its benchmark interest rate a quarter of a percentage point, reviving its aggressive inflation fight despite the slowdown of price hikes.
Speaking at a press conference in Washington, D.C., that month, Fed Chair Jerome Powell downplayed the progress achieved so far in reducing inflation.
“Inflation has moderated somewhat since the middle of last year,” Powell said. “Nonetheless, the process of getting inflation back down to 2% has a long way to go.”
The next decision from the Federal Reserve about a possible rate increase will take place next week.
An additional rate hike could help bring down prices by further slowing the economy and reducing demand, but the move risks ultimately tipping the U.S. into a recession.
So far, the rate hikes appear to have slowed but not imperiled the nation’s economic growth.
While hiring held steady in August with the U.S. economy adding 187,000 jobs, a sharp downward revision of job growth estimates in June and July lowered those totals by a combined 110,000 jobs, Bureau of Labor Statistics data showed.
The mildly bad news for workers bodes well for the nation’s fight against inflation, since in theory a looser jobs market and slower pay hikes take pressure off of companies that may otherwise need to charge higher prices as means of addressing ballooning labor costs, economists previously told ABC News.
Despite the slowdown in hiring, economic growth has proven resilient.
A major upward revision of government data showed that gross domestic product increased at a 2% annualized rate for a three-month period ending in March — a sizable jump from the previous estimate of 1.3%.
Still, U.S. economic growth over the first three months of this year was slower than the 2.6% growth in the previous quarter. In turn, that performance was down from 3.2% growth in the quarter before that.
The cooldown of inflation alongside resilient economic performance has given rise to optimism among many observers that the U.S. will avert a recession.
Nearly two-thirds of forecasters surveyed by the National Association for Business Economics expressed confidence that the economy will achieve a “soft landing,” an outcome in which the U.S. brings down inflation while avoiding a recession, the organization announced last month.
(NEW YORK) — Wall Street and Washington, D.C., will closely watch the release of fresh inflation data on Wednesday that could reveal whether a monthslong cooldown of price increases returned to form in August or struck a rough patch as inflation nears normal levels.
The fresh data follows an uptick in July that reversed some of the progress achieved in the fight to cut price increases and offer relief for household budgets.
Economists expect that consumer prices will have increased 3.6% in August compared to a year ago, which would mark an increase from the inflation rate recorded in July. That month, the inflation rate ticked up on a year-over-year basis for the first time since last summer.
Inflation stands well below its peak last year of over 9% but remains more than a percentage point higher than the Federal Reserve’s target rate.
At the Federal Reserve’s most recent meeting in July, the central bank raised its benchmark interest rate a quarter of a percentage point, reviving its aggressive inflation fight despite the slowdown of price hikes.
Speaking at a press conference in Washington, D.C., that month, Fed Chair Jerome Powell downplayed the progress achieved so far in reducing inflation.
“Inflation has moderated somewhat since the middle of last year,” Powell said. “Nonetheless, the process of getting inflation back down to 2% has a long way to go.”
The next decision from the Federal Reserve about a possible rate increase will take place next week.
An additional rate hike could help bring down prices by further slowing the economy and reducing demand, but the move risks ultimately tipping the U.S. into a recession.
So far, the rate hikes appear to have slowed but not imperiled the nation’s economic growth.
While hiring held steady in August with the U.S. economy adding 187,000 jobs, a sharp downward revision of job growth estimates in June and July lowered those totals by a combined 110,000 jobs, Bureau of Labor Statistics data showed.
The mildly bad news for workers bodes well for the nation’s fight against inflation, since in theory a looser jobs market and slower pay hikes take pressure off of companies that may otherwise need to charge higher prices as means of addressing ballooning labor costs, economists previously told ABC News.
Despite the slowdown in hiring, economic growth has proven resilient.
A major upward revision of government data showed that gross domestic product increased at a 2% annualized rate for a three-month period ending in March — a sizable jump from the previous estimate of 1.3%.
Still, U.S. economic growth over the first three months of this year was slower than the 2.6% growth in the previous quarter. In turn, that performance was down from 3.2% growth in the quarter before that.
The cooldown of inflation alongside resilient economic performance has given rise to optimism among many observers that the U.S. will avert a recession.
Nearly two-thirds of forecasters surveyed by the National Association for Business Economics expressed confidence that the economy will achieve a “soft landing,” an outcome in which the U.S. brings down inflation while avoiding a recession, the organization announced last month.
(WASHINGTON) — The poverty rate in the United States increased last year, the first increase in 13 years, according to the Census Bureau.
In 2022, the poverty rate was 12.4%, up 4.6% from 2021, according to the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), which looks at government programs and tax credits designed to help low-income families, according to the census.
The expiration of pandemic programs, including refundable tax credits and stimulus payments, at the start of 2022, led to an increase in the SPM over the official poverty rate, the census reported.
The poverty rate among children saw a sizeable increase, more than doubling from 5.2% in 2021 to 12.4% last year, census data shows.
The increase in the child poverty rate comes after the child tax credit expansion ended on Dec. 31, 2021.
The child tax credit expansion, which went into effect in July 2021 as part of President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, provided parents between $250 to $300 a month, per child.
Before the child tax credit expansion, one in three children around the country were not eligible for the full Child Tax Credit because the income of their families was too low, according to the Center on Poverty and Social Policy at Columbia University.
President Biden, who had touted the enhanced child tax credit as cutting child poverty in half, sharply criticized congressional Republicans Tuesday for not extending the child tax credit, saying today’s numbers on child poverty are a consequence of their refusal to extend the credit.
“The rise reported today in child poverty is no accident–it is the result of a deliberate policy choice congressional Republicans made to block help for families with children while advancing massive tax cuts for the wealthiest and largest corporations,” The White House said. “No child should grow up in poverty, and I will continue to fight to restore the expanded Child Tax Credit to give tens of millions of families the tax relief and breathing room they deserve.”
Social Security lifted 28.9 million people out of SPM poverty last year, according to census data. In its report, the Census Bureau said Social Security was the “most important antipoverty program in 2022.”
The official poverty rate for Black Americans decreased by 2.4%, from 19.5% in 2021 to 17.1% in 2022, according to census data, as well as for Asian Americans, which saw the official poverty rate dip from 9.1% in 2021 to 8.6% last year.
White Americans experienced a 0.5% increase in poverty from 2021 to 2022, which sits at 10.5%, census data shows.
The official poverty rate measures poverty by comparing pre-tax income to a poverty threshold adjusted by family composition, according to the Census Bureau.
(NEW YORK) — Apple released a new iPhone 15 model on Tuesday that offers a USB-C charging port and improved camera. A fresh version of the Apple Watch was also unveiled.
The top-end models of the iPhone 15, however, deliver a sizable markup. The prices of the standard iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus will remain unchanged, but the price of the iPhone 15 Pro will rise as much as $100, bringing the total to $1,099. The iPhone 15 Pro Max will jump as much as $200, catapulting its overall price to $1,299.
The pricier versions of the iPhone 15 will boast expanded storage, additional battery life, quicker data-transfer speeds and titanium frames, as the tech giant hopes to drive consumers toward the more expensive options.
The Pro models will also run on the new A17 Bionic chipset processor.
All four versions of the iPhone 15 are expected to include the USB-C charging port, offering flexibility for consumers who seek to power their smartphone with a charger that also supports other Apple devices as well as non-Apple products.
For the first time, the full set of iPhone models will also feature the Dynamic Island, a section at the top of the display that delivers alerts or progress updates. The iPhone 15 also brings a 48 megapixel camera to all models.
All four versions of the iPhone 15 will be available for pre-order on Friday, and they go on sale on Sept. 22.
On an earnings call in February, Apple CEO Tim Cook said the company retains the ability to raise the price of the iPhone because it has become such a fixture of consumers’ daily routines. For instance, users store health and banking information on their smartphone and even use it as a payment tool, Cook said.
“The iPhone has become so integral into people’s lives,” Cook said. “So I think people are willing to really stretch to get the best they can afford in that category.”
The iPhone 15 announcement arrives as Apple faces a prolonged iPhone sales slump, however.
IPhone revenue fell 2.4% over three months ending in June, compared to the same period a year prior, Apple’s most recent earnings report showed. The results marked the third consecutive quarter of sliding iPhone sales.
(WASHINGTON) — The Justice Department’s historic antitrust case against Google is set to go to trial Tuesday as the government seeks to prove the Big Tech giant harmed American consumers by stifling competition to maintain its dominance as the internet’s leading search engine.
The lawsuit, originally brought by the Trump administration, alleged that Google acted as a “monopoly gatekeeper to the internet” for billions of users worldwide in part by using “anticompetitive tactics” by entering into exclusionary agreements with phone makers and other browsers to have Google as their default web searcher.
“Two decades ago, Google became the darling of Silicon Valley as a scrappy startup with an innovative way to search the emerging internet. That Google is long gone,” the government said in its initial 2020 complaint against the company.
“The Google of today is a monopoly gatekeeper for the internet, and one of the wealthiest companies on the planet, with a market value of $1 trillion and annual revenue exceeding $160 billion. For many years, Google has used anticompetitive tactics to maintain and extend its monopolies in the markets for general search services, search advertising, and general search text advertising—the cornerstones of its empire.”
Google has previously denied wrongdoing and described the Justice Department’s lawsuit as “deeply flawed,” that risked elevating “lower quality search alternatives,” raising phone prices and making it harder for consumers to use their preferred search engines.
Filings in the case indicate the bench trial before U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta could last at least nine weeks, in what will be a crucial test for the Biden Justice Department as it seeks to potentially further reign in other tech giants like Amazon, Apple and Meta over allegations of anti-competitive behavior.
The Justice Department under President Joe Biden has a second antitrust case still ongoing against the company that focused on its alleged monopoly over advertising technology, in which the company has also denied wrongdoing.
Judge Mehta previously dismissed some of the civil charges brought against the company, according to filings unsealed in the case last month, while allowing some of the more significant charges to proceed to trial.
It’s not immediately clear what a final ruling from Mehta could ultimately mean for the company, and the Justice Department has not been specific on what kind of relief it could seek should they get a full or partial victory after trial.
Experts have speculated that Mehta could order the company to discontinue any of its current default search agreements with phone companies, which net the company billions in revenue annually.
Mehta has said in previous orders that the department must make a showing at trial that the actions Google took were each intended to lock competition out of the web-browsing market.
(NEW YORK) — Apple is set to release a new iPhone 15 model on Tuesday that delivers upgrades but also increased prices for some versions, analysts say. Fresh versions of the Apple Watch and AirPods are also expected to be unveiled.
The company’s latest smartphone is expected to feature an improved camera and a USB-C charging port, Bloomberg reported.
The top-end models of the iPhone 15, however, could deliver a sizable markup, Barclays analyst Tim Long said in a research note reviewed by ABC News.
The prices of the standard iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus will remain unchanged, Long said.
But the price of the iPhone 15 Pro will rise as much as $100, bringing the total to $1,099; while the iPhone 15 Pro Max will jump as much as $200, catapulting its overall price to $1,299, Long added.
The pricier versions of the iPhone 15 will boast expanded storage, additional battery life, quicker data-transfer speeds and titanium frames, Long said, as the tech giant hopes to drive consumers toward the more expensive options.
The Pro models, Long added, will also run on the new A17 Bionic chipset processor.
All four versions of the iPhone 15 are expected to include the USB-C charging port, offering flexibility for consumers who seek to power their smartphone with a charger that also supports non-Apple products, Long said.
For the first time, the full set of iPhone models will also feature the Dynamic Island, a section at the top of the display that delivers alerts or progress updates, Long added.
Last year the company released the iPhone 14, featuring a Pro model that debuted the Dynamic Island as well as a 48-megapixel camera.
The product release event will take place at 1 p.m. ET on Tuesday, and can be viewed online at the Apple website. The iPhone 15 will go on sale around Sept. 22, Bloomberg reported.
On an earnings call, in February, Apple CEO Tim Cook said the company retains the ability to raise the price of the iPhone because it has become such a fixture of consumers’ daily routines. For instance, users store health and banking information on their smartphone and even use it as a payment tool, Cook said.
“The iPhone has become so integral into people’s lives,” Cook said. “So I think people are willing to really stretch to get the best they can afford in that category.”
The iPhone 15 announcement arrives as Apple faces a prolonged iPhone sales slump, however.
iPhone revenue fell 2.4% over three months ending in June, compared to the same period a year prior, Apple’s most recent earnings report showed. The results marked the third consecutive quarter of sliding iPhone sales.
(NEW YORK) — The Zeekr 009 is every American’s dream car. The ultra-luxe cabin comes with massage seats and satiny leather. Futuristic tech like face and voice recognition makes driving effortless. Plus, the capacious 009 packs more than 500 horsepower.
Haven’t heard of the Zeekr 009? You’re not alone. The all-electric minivan (repeat: all-electric minivan) is only sold in China.
Zeekr, owned by Chinese powerhouse Geely, also produces the 001, a sleek all-electric sedan that can travel 621 miles on a single charge. That’s more than double the range of an average EV in the U.S.
“There are so many EVs in China, it’s hard to count them,” Jared Rosenholtz, editor-at-large at CarBuzz, told ABC News. “There are vehicles of all shapes and sizes … many of these are not designed for U.S. market.”
There are 138 automakers in China, the No. 1 auto market in the world. At least 40 of the 138 are purely electric companies, according to J.D. Power. Last year, EV sales in China totaled 6.9 million units, an increase of 93.4% compared to the prior year, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers.
“It’s a market that in many ways is kinda bonkers,” Ed Kim, president and chief analyst at AutoPacific, told ABC News. “EVs are exploding out there … it’s the Wild West. The sheer amount of choice is staggering. Companies in China are developing shockingly radical vehicles.”
Take the Zeekr 009, for example. Minivans are loathed in America. In China, they’re glorified. Minivans are “prestigious” modes of transport, said Kim, and many corporate execs and VIPs are chauffeured in them.
“The Zeekr 009 is the boldest minivan I’ve ever seen,” Kim noted. “A giant screen drops down for passengers. The second row is like a kingly throne. It’s extremely upscale and has all-wheel drive. This is not your mom’s Dodge Caravan.”
CarBuzz’s Rosenholtz pointed out, however, that many EVs in China are pint-size and have a fraction of the power Americans crave in their vehicles. One example is the GM Wuling Mini EV Cabrio, a cute convertible that General Motors builds with its joint venture, SAIC-GM-Wuling.
The car can barely hit 60 mph and makes less than 40 horsepower but it’s affordable — less than $9,000 — and is easy to maneuver around China’s congested city streets.
“The Wuling only has 106 miles of range for the top model but cars are used differently in China,” said Rosenholtz. “Consumers there drive shorter distances. They need small cars.”
Another key difference between Chinese and American EV drivers is the ability to charge overnight, added Kim. “China has extreme population density and even rich Chinese people live in apartments,” he said. “Chinese drivers don’t necessarily have access to home charging like we do in the U.S.”
In addition to electric minivans and adorable convertibles, Chinese automaker XPeng claims its G9 SUV is the “fastest-charging EV” in the world, with the ability to add 200 kilometers of range, or about 124 miles, in under five minutes at a 480-kilowatt charging outlet.
“There’s so little awareness of what’s in China, probably because of the language barrier,” said Kim. “Chinese media is also heavily censored and controlled.”
Plus, the U.S. tacks on a 25% tariff on Chinese imports, another barrier to accessing these newfangled EVs.
“Don’t hold your breath for an XPeng,” said Kim. “Most Chinese brands will be stuck over there.”
EVs have been more widely accepted in China partly because the government there “has pushed the EV cause so strongly,” said Kim. According to J.D. Power, the Chinese government no longer provides generous subsidies to electric vehicle buyers as of Jan. 1, though consumers are still entitled to a 10% purchase tax exemption until the end of the year.
Tesla, the undisputed EV leader in the U.S., is also insanely popular with Chinese motorists. It produces the sought-after Tesla Model Y and 3 at its local Shanghai factory and operates independently, unlike its overseas competitors.
“Tesla is one of the few foreign automakers having tremendous success in China,” Kim said.
Ford CEO Jim Farley recently acknowledged China’s outsized influence on the EV market, saying in May, “I think we see the Chinese as the main competitor, not GM or Toyota. The Chinese are going to be the powerhouse.”
Yet Tyson Jominy, vice president of data and analytics at J.D. Power, argued that U.S. consumers have a far greater selection of EVs to choose from, such as the GMC Hummer EV Pickup, Ford F-150 Lightning and the Rivian R1T truck. Moreover, “niche” and compact EVs that Chinese consumers drive would not fare well in the U.S. until the public charging infrastructure catches up, he said.
“We get the coolest EVs, in my opinion,” Jominy told ABC News. “Fun-to-drive, high-tech, performance orientated — that’s the U.S. market.”
If Chinese EVs are staying put in that country, Kim said he’s going to them, rather than wait.
“I would love a two-week vacation in China to sample all these EVs,” he said.
Sarah Dussault/MediaNews Group/The Mercury News via Getty Images
(AUSTIN, Texas) — Paqui, an Austin, Texas-based chip company famous for its viral Paqui “One Chip Challenge” product, is working with retailers to pull the tortilla chip from shelves, the company announced on its website.
The decision to remove the chip comes after a 14-year-old — Harris Wolobah — died in Massachusetts on Sept. 1, which his family believes is related to the Paqui “One Chip Challenge,” according to WCVB-TV, an ABC News affiliate.
Worcester Police confirmed Wolobah’s death is under investigation and that he died on the same day that he participated in the Paqui “One Chip Challenge.”
“The Paqui One Chip Challenge is intended for adults only, with clear and prominent labeling highlighting the chip is not for children or anyone sensitive to spicy foods or who has food allergies, is pregnant or has underlying health conditions,” the statement from Paqui read.
Paqui was selling single chip packages, and the “One Chip Challenge” involves seeing how long a person can go without eating or drinking after eating the hot pepper chip. The challenge went viral online and many videos show people as they attempt to eat the chip.
According to Paqui’s frequently asked question section on their website, the chip is seasoned with Carolina Reaper Peppers and Naga Viper Pepper. The site also said the peppers are “among the hottest peppers currently available,” with Carolina Reaper Peppers roughly 1.7 million Scoville Units and the Naga Viper Pepper at roughly 1.4 million Scoville Units, a unit used to measure the heat of peppers. A jalapeño registers between 2,500 and 8,000 Scoville Units, according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Paqui explained they were pulling the chip since they had seen consumers not paying attention to the recommendations on the label.
“We have seen an increase in teens and other individuals not heeding these warnings. As a result, while the product continues to adhere to food safety standards, out of an abundance of caution, we are actively working with our retailers to remove the product from shelves,” the company’s statement continued.
Worcester District Attorney Joseph D. Early Jr. posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Tuesday to note the dangers of the chip.
“Medical professionals have said the tortilla chip, which is made from two of the spiciest chili peppers in the world, can cause very serious and dangerous side effects,” read Early Jr.’s post.
Early Jr. suggested parents warn their children not to participate in the viral challenge as “other states across the country have seen hospitalizations due to the chip challenge, including teens.”
In a statement announcing Wolobah’s death, Worcester Public Schools Superintendent Rachel Monárrez said: “As a mother and educator, I cannot imagine how hard this is on his family, friends and teachers. My heart goes out to all who knew and loved him.”
Paqui said the company is offering refunds on the “One Chip Challenge” product.
Good Morning America has reached out to Paqui for additional comment.
(NEW YORK) — The Walt Disney Company narrowed the scope of its lawsuit against Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Thursday to focus solely on its First Amendment claim that the governor politically retaliated against the company.
The lawsuit now focuses on the company’s claim that DeSantis and his allies allegedly retaliated against Disney for exercising its right to free speech under the First Amendment.
“A targeted campaign of government retaliation — orchestrated at every step by Governor DeSantis as punishment for Disney’s protected speech — now threatens Disney’s business operations, jeopardizes its economic future in the region, and violates its constitutional rights,” the lawsuit reads.
Last week, Disney, the parent company of ABC, asked to drop its other claims in the lawsuit, which centered on the company’s development contracts.
“We will continue to fight vigorously to defend these contracts, because these agreements will determine whether or not Disney can invest billions of dollars and generate thousands of new jobs in Florida,” a Disney spokesperson told ABC News in a statement.
The dispute between Disney and DeSantis started last year when Disney, under then-CEO Bob Chapek, opposed a new piece of legislation, titled the Parental Rights in Education Act, which sought to eliminate discussions of sexuality or gender identity in some K-12 classrooms. Critics denounced the legislation as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, a name its supporters reject.
The state Legislature went on to pass a law, signed by DeSantis, to revoke Disney’s long-held special tax district in Florida.
In August, DeSantis said in a CNBC interview he had “moved on” from his battle with Disney, saying that Disney should “drop the lawsuit” it filed claiming a “targeted campaign of government retaliation” by his administration, which he has denied.
